Forefoot Deformities in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Mid- to Long-Term Result of Joint-Preserving Surgery in Comparison with Resection Arthroplasty

Background: Joint-preserving surgery for the forefoot has been increasingly performed for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We compared joint-preserving surgeries with resection arthroplasty for RA in the forefoot. Methods: Forefoot surgeries were performed on 62 toes in 42 patients with RA (men: 2; women:...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yuya Takakubo, Yoshihiro Wanezaki, Hiroharu Oki, Yasushi Naganuma, Junichiro Shibuya, Ryusuke Honma, Akemi Suzuki, Hiroshi Satake, Michiaki Takagi
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/15de9c955661437aaf53145f218e6093
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:15de9c955661437aaf53145f218e6093
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:15de9c955661437aaf53145f218e60932021-11-11T16:24:26ZForefoot Deformities in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Mid- to Long-Term Result of Joint-Preserving Surgery in Comparison with Resection Arthroplasty10.3390/ijerph1821112571660-46011661-7827https://doaj.org/article/15de9c955661437aaf53145f218e60932021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/21/11257https://doaj.org/toc/1661-7827https://doaj.org/toc/1660-4601Background: Joint-preserving surgery for the forefoot has been increasingly performed for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We compared joint-preserving surgeries with resection arthroplasty for RA in the forefoot. Methods: Forefoot surgeries were performed on 62 toes in 42 patients with RA (men: 2; women: 40) between 2002 and 2018. Three groups were compared: PP—31 toes treated with joint-preserving surgery involving the modified Mann method for the big toe and offset osteotomy for lesser toes, PR—15 toes treated with joint-preserving surgery for the big toe and resection arthroplasty for lesser toes, and RR—16 toes treated with resection arthroplasty for all the toes. Results: The PP group had significantly higher mean scores on a scale for RA in the foot and ankle at the latest follow-up than the RR group (86 vs. 75 points; <i>p</i> < 0.05). Hallux valgus (angle > 20°) of the big toe at the latest follow-up recurred in 10 (32%), 9 (60%), and 16 (100%) patients in the PP, PR, and RR groups, respectively. A revision surgery was performed in one patient each in the PP and PR groups. Conclusions: Joint-preserving surgery is superior to resection arthroplasty in preventing function loss and the recurrence of hallux valgus.Yuya TakakuboYoshihiro WanezakiHiroharu OkiYasushi NaganumaJunichiro ShibuyaRyusuke HonmaAkemi SuzukiHiroshi SatakeMichiaki TakagiMDPI AGarticlefootjoint-preserving surgeryrheumatoid arthritisMedicineRENInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol 18, Iss 11257, p 11257 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic foot
joint-preserving surgery
rheumatoid arthritis
Medicine
R
spellingShingle foot
joint-preserving surgery
rheumatoid arthritis
Medicine
R
Yuya Takakubo
Yoshihiro Wanezaki
Hiroharu Oki
Yasushi Naganuma
Junichiro Shibuya
Ryusuke Honma
Akemi Suzuki
Hiroshi Satake
Michiaki Takagi
Forefoot Deformities in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Mid- to Long-Term Result of Joint-Preserving Surgery in Comparison with Resection Arthroplasty
description Background: Joint-preserving surgery for the forefoot has been increasingly performed for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We compared joint-preserving surgeries with resection arthroplasty for RA in the forefoot. Methods: Forefoot surgeries were performed on 62 toes in 42 patients with RA (men: 2; women: 40) between 2002 and 2018. Three groups were compared: PP—31 toes treated with joint-preserving surgery involving the modified Mann method for the big toe and offset osteotomy for lesser toes, PR—15 toes treated with joint-preserving surgery for the big toe and resection arthroplasty for lesser toes, and RR—16 toes treated with resection arthroplasty for all the toes. Results: The PP group had significantly higher mean scores on a scale for RA in the foot and ankle at the latest follow-up than the RR group (86 vs. 75 points; <i>p</i> < 0.05). Hallux valgus (angle > 20°) of the big toe at the latest follow-up recurred in 10 (32%), 9 (60%), and 16 (100%) patients in the PP, PR, and RR groups, respectively. A revision surgery was performed in one patient each in the PP and PR groups. Conclusions: Joint-preserving surgery is superior to resection arthroplasty in preventing function loss and the recurrence of hallux valgus.
format article
author Yuya Takakubo
Yoshihiro Wanezaki
Hiroharu Oki
Yasushi Naganuma
Junichiro Shibuya
Ryusuke Honma
Akemi Suzuki
Hiroshi Satake
Michiaki Takagi
author_facet Yuya Takakubo
Yoshihiro Wanezaki
Hiroharu Oki
Yasushi Naganuma
Junichiro Shibuya
Ryusuke Honma
Akemi Suzuki
Hiroshi Satake
Michiaki Takagi
author_sort Yuya Takakubo
title Forefoot Deformities in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Mid- to Long-Term Result of Joint-Preserving Surgery in Comparison with Resection Arthroplasty
title_short Forefoot Deformities in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Mid- to Long-Term Result of Joint-Preserving Surgery in Comparison with Resection Arthroplasty
title_full Forefoot Deformities in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Mid- to Long-Term Result of Joint-Preserving Surgery in Comparison with Resection Arthroplasty
title_fullStr Forefoot Deformities in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Mid- to Long-Term Result of Joint-Preserving Surgery in Comparison with Resection Arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed Forefoot Deformities in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Mid- to Long-Term Result of Joint-Preserving Surgery in Comparison with Resection Arthroplasty
title_sort forefoot deformities in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: mid- to long-term result of joint-preserving surgery in comparison with resection arthroplasty
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/15de9c955661437aaf53145f218e6093
work_keys_str_mv AT yuyatakakubo forefootdeformitiesinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritismidtolongtermresultofjointpreservingsurgeryincomparisonwithresectionarthroplasty
AT yoshihirowanezaki forefootdeformitiesinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritismidtolongtermresultofjointpreservingsurgeryincomparisonwithresectionarthroplasty
AT hiroharuoki forefootdeformitiesinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritismidtolongtermresultofjointpreservingsurgeryincomparisonwithresectionarthroplasty
AT yasushinaganuma forefootdeformitiesinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritismidtolongtermresultofjointpreservingsurgeryincomparisonwithresectionarthroplasty
AT junichiroshibuya forefootdeformitiesinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritismidtolongtermresultofjointpreservingsurgeryincomparisonwithresectionarthroplasty
AT ryusukehonma forefootdeformitiesinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritismidtolongtermresultofjointpreservingsurgeryincomparisonwithresectionarthroplasty
AT akemisuzuki forefootdeformitiesinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritismidtolongtermresultofjointpreservingsurgeryincomparisonwithresectionarthroplasty
AT hiroshisatake forefootdeformitiesinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritismidtolongtermresultofjointpreservingsurgeryincomparisonwithresectionarthroplasty
AT michiakitakagi forefootdeformitiesinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritismidtolongtermresultofjointpreservingsurgeryincomparisonwithresectionarthroplasty
_version_ 1718432339196903424