Forefoot Deformities in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Mid- to Long-Term Result of Joint-Preserving Surgery in Comparison with Resection Arthroplasty
Background: Joint-preserving surgery for the forefoot has been increasingly performed for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We compared joint-preserving surgeries with resection arthroplasty for RA in the forefoot. Methods: Forefoot surgeries were performed on 62 toes in 42 patients with RA (men: 2; women:...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
MDPI AG
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/15de9c955661437aaf53145f218e6093 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:15de9c955661437aaf53145f218e6093 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:15de9c955661437aaf53145f218e60932021-11-11T16:24:26ZForefoot Deformities in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Mid- to Long-Term Result of Joint-Preserving Surgery in Comparison with Resection Arthroplasty10.3390/ijerph1821112571660-46011661-7827https://doaj.org/article/15de9c955661437aaf53145f218e60932021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/21/11257https://doaj.org/toc/1661-7827https://doaj.org/toc/1660-4601Background: Joint-preserving surgery for the forefoot has been increasingly performed for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We compared joint-preserving surgeries with resection arthroplasty for RA in the forefoot. Methods: Forefoot surgeries were performed on 62 toes in 42 patients with RA (men: 2; women: 40) between 2002 and 2018. Three groups were compared: PP—31 toes treated with joint-preserving surgery involving the modified Mann method for the big toe and offset osteotomy for lesser toes, PR—15 toes treated with joint-preserving surgery for the big toe and resection arthroplasty for lesser toes, and RR—16 toes treated with resection arthroplasty for all the toes. Results: The PP group had significantly higher mean scores on a scale for RA in the foot and ankle at the latest follow-up than the RR group (86 vs. 75 points; <i>p</i> < 0.05). Hallux valgus (angle > 20°) of the big toe at the latest follow-up recurred in 10 (32%), 9 (60%), and 16 (100%) patients in the PP, PR, and RR groups, respectively. A revision surgery was performed in one patient each in the PP and PR groups. Conclusions: Joint-preserving surgery is superior to resection arthroplasty in preventing function loss and the recurrence of hallux valgus.Yuya TakakuboYoshihiro WanezakiHiroharu OkiYasushi NaganumaJunichiro ShibuyaRyusuke HonmaAkemi SuzukiHiroshi SatakeMichiaki TakagiMDPI AGarticlefootjoint-preserving surgeryrheumatoid arthritisMedicineRENInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol 18, Iss 11257, p 11257 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
foot joint-preserving surgery rheumatoid arthritis Medicine R |
spellingShingle |
foot joint-preserving surgery rheumatoid arthritis Medicine R Yuya Takakubo Yoshihiro Wanezaki Hiroharu Oki Yasushi Naganuma Junichiro Shibuya Ryusuke Honma Akemi Suzuki Hiroshi Satake Michiaki Takagi Forefoot Deformities in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Mid- to Long-Term Result of Joint-Preserving Surgery in Comparison with Resection Arthroplasty |
description |
Background: Joint-preserving surgery for the forefoot has been increasingly performed for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We compared joint-preserving surgeries with resection arthroplasty for RA in the forefoot. Methods: Forefoot surgeries were performed on 62 toes in 42 patients with RA (men: 2; women: 40) between 2002 and 2018. Three groups were compared: PP—31 toes treated with joint-preserving surgery involving the modified Mann method for the big toe and offset osteotomy for lesser toes, PR—15 toes treated with joint-preserving surgery for the big toe and resection arthroplasty for lesser toes, and RR—16 toes treated with resection arthroplasty for all the toes. Results: The PP group had significantly higher mean scores on a scale for RA in the foot and ankle at the latest follow-up than the RR group (86 vs. 75 points; <i>p</i> < 0.05). Hallux valgus (angle > 20°) of the big toe at the latest follow-up recurred in 10 (32%), 9 (60%), and 16 (100%) patients in the PP, PR, and RR groups, respectively. A revision surgery was performed in one patient each in the PP and PR groups. Conclusions: Joint-preserving surgery is superior to resection arthroplasty in preventing function loss and the recurrence of hallux valgus. |
format |
article |
author |
Yuya Takakubo Yoshihiro Wanezaki Hiroharu Oki Yasushi Naganuma Junichiro Shibuya Ryusuke Honma Akemi Suzuki Hiroshi Satake Michiaki Takagi |
author_facet |
Yuya Takakubo Yoshihiro Wanezaki Hiroharu Oki Yasushi Naganuma Junichiro Shibuya Ryusuke Honma Akemi Suzuki Hiroshi Satake Michiaki Takagi |
author_sort |
Yuya Takakubo |
title |
Forefoot Deformities in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Mid- to Long-Term Result of Joint-Preserving Surgery in Comparison with Resection Arthroplasty |
title_short |
Forefoot Deformities in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Mid- to Long-Term Result of Joint-Preserving Surgery in Comparison with Resection Arthroplasty |
title_full |
Forefoot Deformities in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Mid- to Long-Term Result of Joint-Preserving Surgery in Comparison with Resection Arthroplasty |
title_fullStr |
Forefoot Deformities in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Mid- to Long-Term Result of Joint-Preserving Surgery in Comparison with Resection Arthroplasty |
title_full_unstemmed |
Forefoot Deformities in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Mid- to Long-Term Result of Joint-Preserving Surgery in Comparison with Resection Arthroplasty |
title_sort |
forefoot deformities in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: mid- to long-term result of joint-preserving surgery in comparison with resection arthroplasty |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/15de9c955661437aaf53145f218e6093 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yuyatakakubo forefootdeformitiesinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritismidtolongtermresultofjointpreservingsurgeryincomparisonwithresectionarthroplasty AT yoshihirowanezaki forefootdeformitiesinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritismidtolongtermresultofjointpreservingsurgeryincomparisonwithresectionarthroplasty AT hiroharuoki forefootdeformitiesinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritismidtolongtermresultofjointpreservingsurgeryincomparisonwithresectionarthroplasty AT yasushinaganuma forefootdeformitiesinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritismidtolongtermresultofjointpreservingsurgeryincomparisonwithresectionarthroplasty AT junichiroshibuya forefootdeformitiesinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritismidtolongtermresultofjointpreservingsurgeryincomparisonwithresectionarthroplasty AT ryusukehonma forefootdeformitiesinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritismidtolongtermresultofjointpreservingsurgeryincomparisonwithresectionarthroplasty AT akemisuzuki forefootdeformitiesinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritismidtolongtermresultofjointpreservingsurgeryincomparisonwithresectionarthroplasty AT hiroshisatake forefootdeformitiesinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritismidtolongtermresultofjointpreservingsurgeryincomparisonwithresectionarthroplasty AT michiakitakagi forefootdeformitiesinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritismidtolongtermresultofjointpreservingsurgeryincomparisonwithresectionarthroplasty |
_version_ |
1718432339196903424 |