Prevalence of peri‐implantitis in a sample of HIV‐positive patients
Abstract Objectives This study aimed to assess the prevalence of peri‐implantitis in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)‐positive patients and the presence of a possible correlation between the immunological profile and serological values, of peri‐implantitis, and of possible differences between all‐...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Wiley
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/15e1590bd385433eab2e1a330e73db69 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:15e1590bd385433eab2e1a330e73db69 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:15e1590bd385433eab2e1a330e73db692021-12-02T12:59:21ZPrevalence of peri‐implantitis in a sample of HIV‐positive patients2057-434710.1002/cre2.469https://doaj.org/article/15e1590bd385433eab2e1a330e73db692021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.469https://doaj.org/toc/2057-4347Abstract Objectives This study aimed to assess the prevalence of peri‐implantitis in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)‐positive patients and the presence of a possible correlation between the immunological profile and serological values, of peri‐implantitis, and of possible differences between all‐on‐4 and single crown/bridge prostheses. Subjects and methods This retrospective study included 58 adult HIV‐positive patients (222 implants) with either all‐in‐4 prostheses or single crowns/bridges on at least one dental implant loaded for more than a year who were followed for 3 year (mean follow‐up). Data pertaining to the probing pocket depth (PPD), bleeding on probing, and immunological and systemic profile were collected. Results Patients with single crown/bridge implant rehabilitation showed higher prevalence of peri‐implantitis (34%) than patients with all‐on‐4 rehabilitation (0%) (p = 0.012). Patients with all‐on‐4 rehabilitation were significantly older than those with single crowns/bridges (p = 0.004). Patients with peri‐implantitis had implants for a significantly longer duration than those without (p = 0.001), implying that the probability of peri‐implantitis increases as the age of implant increases. Conclusions The prevalence of peri‐implantitis was 26% in the HIV‐positive patients population. No correlation was found between patients' immunological and serological factors and peri‐implantitis. The most important risk factor for peri‐implantitis and mucositis was implant age.Luca CasulaAndrea PoliTommaso ClementeGiulia ArtusoPaolo CapparéEnrico F. GherloneWileyarticleall‐on‐4HIV‐positive patientsmucositisperi‐implantitisDentistryRK1-715ENClinical and Experimental Dental Research, Vol 7, Iss 6, Pp 1002-1013 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
all‐on‐4 HIV‐positive patients mucositis peri‐implantitis Dentistry RK1-715 |
spellingShingle |
all‐on‐4 HIV‐positive patients mucositis peri‐implantitis Dentistry RK1-715 Luca Casula Andrea Poli Tommaso Clemente Giulia Artuso Paolo Capparé Enrico F. Gherlone Prevalence of peri‐implantitis in a sample of HIV‐positive patients |
description |
Abstract Objectives This study aimed to assess the prevalence of peri‐implantitis in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)‐positive patients and the presence of a possible correlation between the immunological profile and serological values, of peri‐implantitis, and of possible differences between all‐on‐4 and single crown/bridge prostheses. Subjects and methods This retrospective study included 58 adult HIV‐positive patients (222 implants) with either all‐in‐4 prostheses or single crowns/bridges on at least one dental implant loaded for more than a year who were followed for 3 year (mean follow‐up). Data pertaining to the probing pocket depth (PPD), bleeding on probing, and immunological and systemic profile were collected. Results Patients with single crown/bridge implant rehabilitation showed higher prevalence of peri‐implantitis (34%) than patients with all‐on‐4 rehabilitation (0%) (p = 0.012). Patients with all‐on‐4 rehabilitation were significantly older than those with single crowns/bridges (p = 0.004). Patients with peri‐implantitis had implants for a significantly longer duration than those without (p = 0.001), implying that the probability of peri‐implantitis increases as the age of implant increases. Conclusions The prevalence of peri‐implantitis was 26% in the HIV‐positive patients population. No correlation was found between patients' immunological and serological factors and peri‐implantitis. The most important risk factor for peri‐implantitis and mucositis was implant age. |
format |
article |
author |
Luca Casula Andrea Poli Tommaso Clemente Giulia Artuso Paolo Capparé Enrico F. Gherlone |
author_facet |
Luca Casula Andrea Poli Tommaso Clemente Giulia Artuso Paolo Capparé Enrico F. Gherlone |
author_sort |
Luca Casula |
title |
Prevalence of peri‐implantitis in a sample of HIV‐positive patients |
title_short |
Prevalence of peri‐implantitis in a sample of HIV‐positive patients |
title_full |
Prevalence of peri‐implantitis in a sample of HIV‐positive patients |
title_fullStr |
Prevalence of peri‐implantitis in a sample of HIV‐positive patients |
title_full_unstemmed |
Prevalence of peri‐implantitis in a sample of HIV‐positive patients |
title_sort |
prevalence of peri‐implantitis in a sample of hiv‐positive patients |
publisher |
Wiley |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/15e1590bd385433eab2e1a330e73db69 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT lucacasula prevalenceofperiimplantitisinasampleofhivpositivepatients AT andreapoli prevalenceofperiimplantitisinasampleofhivpositivepatients AT tommasoclemente prevalenceofperiimplantitisinasampleofhivpositivepatients AT giuliaartuso prevalenceofperiimplantitisinasampleofhivpositivepatients AT paolocappare prevalenceofperiimplantitisinasampleofhivpositivepatients AT enricofgherlone prevalenceofperiimplantitisinasampleofhivpositivepatients |
_version_ |
1718393550961377280 |