The impact of adherence to screening guidelines and of diabetes clinics referral on morbidity and mortality in diabetes.

Despite the heightened awareness of diabetes as a major health problem, evidence on the impact of assistance and organizational factors, as well as of adherence to recommended care guidelines, on morbidity and mortality in diabetes is scanty. We identified diabetic residents in Torino, Italy, as of...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carlo Giorda, Roberta Picariello, Elisa Nada, Barbara Tartaglino, Lisa Marafetti, Giuseppe Costa, Roberto Gnavi
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2012
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/163eea4888a74592ba7f05dae449349e
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:163eea4888a74592ba7f05dae449349e
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:163eea4888a74592ba7f05dae449349e2021-11-18T07:23:25ZThe impact of adherence to screening guidelines and of diabetes clinics referral on morbidity and mortality in diabetes.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0033839https://doaj.org/article/163eea4888a74592ba7f05dae449349e2012-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/22509263/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Despite the heightened awareness of diabetes as a major health problem, evidence on the impact of assistance and organizational factors, as well as of adherence to recommended care guidelines, on morbidity and mortality in diabetes is scanty. We identified diabetic residents in Torino, Italy, as of 1st January 2002, using multiple independent data sources. We collected data on several laboratory tests and specialist medical examinations to compare primary versus specialty care management of diabetes and the fulfillment of a quality-of-care indicator based on existing screening guidelines (GCI). Then, we performed regression analyses to identify associations of these factors with mortality and cardiovascular morbidity over a 4 year-follow-up. Patients with the lowest degree of quality of care (i.e. only cared for by primary care and with no fulfillment of GCI) had worse RRs for all-cause (1.72 [95% CI 1.57-1.89]), cardiovascular (1.74 [95% CI 1.50-2.01]) and cancer (1.35 [95% CI 1.14-1.61]) mortality, compared with those with the highest quality of care. They also showed increased RRs for incidence of major cardiovascular events up to 2.03 (95% CI 1.26-3.28) for lower extremity amputations. Receiving specialist care itself increased survival, but was far more effective when combined with the fulfillment of GCI. Throughout the whole set of analysis, implementation of guidelines emerged as a strong modifier of prognosis. We conclude that management of diabetic patients with a pathway based on both primary and specialist care is associated with a favorable impact on all-cause mortality and CV incidence, provided that guidelines are implemented.Carlo GiordaRoberta PicarielloElisa NadaBarbara TartaglinoLisa MarafettiGiuseppe CostaRoberto GnaviPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 7, Iss 4, p e33839 (2012)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Carlo Giorda
Roberta Picariello
Elisa Nada
Barbara Tartaglino
Lisa Marafetti
Giuseppe Costa
Roberto Gnavi
The impact of adherence to screening guidelines and of diabetes clinics referral on morbidity and mortality in diabetes.
description Despite the heightened awareness of diabetes as a major health problem, evidence on the impact of assistance and organizational factors, as well as of adherence to recommended care guidelines, on morbidity and mortality in diabetes is scanty. We identified diabetic residents in Torino, Italy, as of 1st January 2002, using multiple independent data sources. We collected data on several laboratory tests and specialist medical examinations to compare primary versus specialty care management of diabetes and the fulfillment of a quality-of-care indicator based on existing screening guidelines (GCI). Then, we performed regression analyses to identify associations of these factors with mortality and cardiovascular morbidity over a 4 year-follow-up. Patients with the lowest degree of quality of care (i.e. only cared for by primary care and with no fulfillment of GCI) had worse RRs for all-cause (1.72 [95% CI 1.57-1.89]), cardiovascular (1.74 [95% CI 1.50-2.01]) and cancer (1.35 [95% CI 1.14-1.61]) mortality, compared with those with the highest quality of care. They also showed increased RRs for incidence of major cardiovascular events up to 2.03 (95% CI 1.26-3.28) for lower extremity amputations. Receiving specialist care itself increased survival, but was far more effective when combined with the fulfillment of GCI. Throughout the whole set of analysis, implementation of guidelines emerged as a strong modifier of prognosis. We conclude that management of diabetic patients with a pathway based on both primary and specialist care is associated with a favorable impact on all-cause mortality and CV incidence, provided that guidelines are implemented.
format article
author Carlo Giorda
Roberta Picariello
Elisa Nada
Barbara Tartaglino
Lisa Marafetti
Giuseppe Costa
Roberto Gnavi
author_facet Carlo Giorda
Roberta Picariello
Elisa Nada
Barbara Tartaglino
Lisa Marafetti
Giuseppe Costa
Roberto Gnavi
author_sort Carlo Giorda
title The impact of adherence to screening guidelines and of diabetes clinics referral on morbidity and mortality in diabetes.
title_short The impact of adherence to screening guidelines and of diabetes clinics referral on morbidity and mortality in diabetes.
title_full The impact of adherence to screening guidelines and of diabetes clinics referral on morbidity and mortality in diabetes.
title_fullStr The impact of adherence to screening guidelines and of diabetes clinics referral on morbidity and mortality in diabetes.
title_full_unstemmed The impact of adherence to screening guidelines and of diabetes clinics referral on morbidity and mortality in diabetes.
title_sort impact of adherence to screening guidelines and of diabetes clinics referral on morbidity and mortality in diabetes.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2012
url https://doaj.org/article/163eea4888a74592ba7f05dae449349e
work_keys_str_mv AT carlogiorda theimpactofadherencetoscreeningguidelinesandofdiabetesclinicsreferralonmorbidityandmortalityindiabetes
AT robertapicariello theimpactofadherencetoscreeningguidelinesandofdiabetesclinicsreferralonmorbidityandmortalityindiabetes
AT elisanada theimpactofadherencetoscreeningguidelinesandofdiabetesclinicsreferralonmorbidityandmortalityindiabetes
AT barbaratartaglino theimpactofadherencetoscreeningguidelinesandofdiabetesclinicsreferralonmorbidityandmortalityindiabetes
AT lisamarafetti theimpactofadherencetoscreeningguidelinesandofdiabetesclinicsreferralonmorbidityandmortalityindiabetes
AT giuseppecosta theimpactofadherencetoscreeningguidelinesandofdiabetesclinicsreferralonmorbidityandmortalityindiabetes
AT robertognavi theimpactofadherencetoscreeningguidelinesandofdiabetesclinicsreferralonmorbidityandmortalityindiabetes
AT carlogiorda impactofadherencetoscreeningguidelinesandofdiabetesclinicsreferralonmorbidityandmortalityindiabetes
AT robertapicariello impactofadherencetoscreeningguidelinesandofdiabetesclinicsreferralonmorbidityandmortalityindiabetes
AT elisanada impactofadherencetoscreeningguidelinesandofdiabetesclinicsreferralonmorbidityandmortalityindiabetes
AT barbaratartaglino impactofadherencetoscreeningguidelinesandofdiabetesclinicsreferralonmorbidityandmortalityindiabetes
AT lisamarafetti impactofadherencetoscreeningguidelinesandofdiabetesclinicsreferralonmorbidityandmortalityindiabetes
AT giuseppecosta impactofadherencetoscreeningguidelinesandofdiabetesclinicsreferralonmorbidityandmortalityindiabetes
AT robertognavi impactofadherencetoscreeningguidelinesandofdiabetesclinicsreferralonmorbidityandmortalityindiabetes
_version_ 1718423520041500672