More Perspectives on the Late Prehistoric Site of Qiryat Ata

In a recent SAAC article, Eliot Braun (2012) has published a critique of my excavations at the late prehistoric site of Qiryat Ata. Reexamination of a site’s stratigraphy and reinterpretation of archaeological data are welcome, if their purpose is to truly enhance our understanding of the history o...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Amir Golani
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN FR
Publicado:	Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing 2014
Materias:	Near Eastern archaeology Southern Levant Early Bronze Age Qiryat Ata stratigraphic interpretation archaeological methodology Ancient history D51-90 History of the arts NX440-632
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/1644d15e2675498b9e75b2bfc025e711
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:1644d15e2675498b9e75b2bfc025e711
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:1644d15e2675498b9e75b2bfc025e7112021-11-27T13:19:28ZMore Perspectives on the Late Prehistoric Site of Qiryat Ata10.12797/SAAC.18.2014.18.181899-15482449-867Xhttps://doaj.org/article/1644d15e2675498b9e75b2bfc025e7112014-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journals.akademicka.pl/saac/article/view/3094https://doaj.org/toc/1899-1548https://doaj.org/toc/2449-867X In a recent SAAC article, Eliot Braun (2012) has published a critique of my excavations at the late prehistoric site of Qiryat Ata. Reexamination of a site’s stratigraphy and reinterpretation of archaeological data are welcome, if their purpose is to truly enhance our understanding of the history of the site and thus gain a better understanding of the archaeological periods of its occupation. Such a reevaluation should be based on factual evidence, exacting analysis and the realization that even the same data can and is open to different interpretation. Reexamination of the data would strive to offer accurate and useful conclusions that could substantially augment our perception of the archaeological record and be a catalyst for future research and fruitful collegial discussion among scholars. The purpose of the following is to address the claims and allegations raised by Braun in his article. While some points of Braun’s critique may have their merit and provide a future basis for discussion, examination of his major points shows them to be basically unfounded. Amir GolaniKsiegarnia Akademicka PublishingarticleNear Eastern archaeologySouthern LevantEarly Bronze AgeQiryat Atastratigraphic interpretationarchaeological methodologyAncient historyD51-90History of the artsNX440-632ENFRStudies in Ancient Art and Civilization, Vol 18 (2014)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN FR
topic	Near Eastern archaeology Southern Levant Early Bronze Age Qiryat Ata stratigraphic interpretation archaeological methodology Ancient history D51-90 History of the arts NX440-632
spellingShingle	Near Eastern archaeology Southern Levant Early Bronze Age Qiryat Ata stratigraphic interpretation archaeological methodology Ancient history D51-90 History of the arts NX440-632 Amir Golani More Perspectives on the Late Prehistoric Site of Qiryat Ata
description	In a recent SAAC article, Eliot Braun (2012) has published a critique of my excavations at the late prehistoric site of Qiryat Ata. Reexamination of a site’s stratigraphy and reinterpretation of archaeological data are welcome, if their purpose is to truly enhance our understanding of the history of the site and thus gain a better understanding of the archaeological periods of its occupation. Such a reevaluation should be based on factual evidence, exacting analysis and the realization that even the same data can and is open to different interpretation. Reexamination of the data would strive to offer accurate and useful conclusions that could substantially augment our perception of the archaeological record and be a catalyst for future research and fruitful collegial discussion among scholars. The purpose of the following is to address the claims and allegations raised by Braun in his article. While some points of Braun’s critique may have their merit and provide a future basis for discussion, examination of his major points shows them to be basically unfounded.
format	article
author	Amir Golani
author_facet	Amir Golani
author_sort	Amir Golani
title	More Perspectives on the Late Prehistoric Site of Qiryat Ata
title_short	More Perspectives on the Late Prehistoric Site of Qiryat Ata
title_full	More Perspectives on the Late Prehistoric Site of Qiryat Ata
title_fullStr	More Perspectives on the Late Prehistoric Site of Qiryat Ata
title_full_unstemmed	More Perspectives on the Late Prehistoric Site of Qiryat Ata
title_sort	more perspectives on the late prehistoric site of qiryat ata
publisher	Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing
publishDate	2014
url	https://doaj.org/article/1644d15e2675498b9e75b2bfc025e711
work_keys_str_mv	AT amirgolani moreperspectivesonthelateprehistoricsiteofqiryatata
_version_	1718408484272209920

More Perspectives on the Late Prehistoric Site of Qiryat Ata

Ejemplares similares