Consequences of different sample drying temperatures for accuracy of biomass inventories in forest ecosystems

Abstract Biomass estimation is one of the crucial tasks of forest ecology. Drying tree material is a crucial stage of preparing biomass estimation tools. However, at this step researchers use different drying temperatures, but we do not know how this influences accuracy of models. We aimed to assess...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Andrzej M. Jagodziński, Marcin K. Dyderski, Kamil Gęsikiewicz, Paweł Horodecki
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Nature Portfolio 2020
Materias:	Medicine R Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/1653ac22e8594404b1c3d5d08a71057f
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:1653ac22e8594404b1c3d5d08a71057f
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:1653ac22e8594404b1c3d5d08a71057f2021-12-02T18:51:13ZConsequences of different sample drying temperatures for accuracy of biomass inventories in forest ecosystems10.1038/s41598-020-73053-92045-2322https://doaj.org/article/1653ac22e8594404b1c3d5d08a71057f2020-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73053-9https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Biomass estimation is one of the crucial tasks of forest ecology. Drying tree material is a crucial stage of preparing biomass estimation tools. However, at this step researchers use different drying temperatures, but we do not know how this influences accuracy of models. We aimed to assess differences in dry biomass between two drying temperatures (75 °C and 105 °C) in tree biomass components and to provide coefficients allowing for recalculation between the given temperatures. We used a set of 1440 samples from bark, branches, foliage and wood of eight European tree species: Abies alba Mill., Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn., Betula pendula Roth., Fagus sylvatica L., Larix decidua Mill., Picea abies (L.) H. Karst., Pinus sylvestris L. and Quercus robur L. The differences between drying temperatures were 1.67%, 1.76%, 2.20% and 0.96% of sample dry masses of bark, branches, foliage and stem wood, respectively. Tree species influenced these differences. Our study provided coefficients allowing for recalculation of masses between the two temperatures, to unify results from different studies. However, the difference in dry mass between the two temperatures studied is lower than the range of uncertainty of biomass models, thus its influence on results of large-scale biomass assessments is low.Andrzej M. JagodzińskiMarcin K. DyderskiKamil GęsikiewiczPaweł HorodeckiNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 10, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2020)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R Science Q
spellingShingle	Medicine R Science Q Andrzej M. Jagodziński Marcin K. Dyderski Kamil Gęsikiewicz Paweł Horodecki Consequences of different sample drying temperatures for accuracy of biomass inventories in forest ecosystems
description	Abstract Biomass estimation is one of the crucial tasks of forest ecology. Drying tree material is a crucial stage of preparing biomass estimation tools. However, at this step researchers use different drying temperatures, but we do not know how this influences accuracy of models. We aimed to assess differences in dry biomass between two drying temperatures (75 °C and 105 °C) in tree biomass components and to provide coefficients allowing for recalculation between the given temperatures. We used a set of 1440 samples from bark, branches, foliage and wood of eight European tree species: Abies alba Mill., Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn., Betula pendula Roth., Fagus sylvatica L., Larix decidua Mill., Picea abies (L.) H. Karst., Pinus sylvestris L. and Quercus robur L. The differences between drying temperatures were 1.67%, 1.76%, 2.20% and 0.96% of sample dry masses of bark, branches, foliage and stem wood, respectively. Tree species influenced these differences. Our study provided coefficients allowing for recalculation of masses between the two temperatures, to unify results from different studies. However, the difference in dry mass between the two temperatures studied is lower than the range of uncertainty of biomass models, thus its influence on results of large-scale biomass assessments is low.
format	article
author	Andrzej M. Jagodziński Marcin K. Dyderski Kamil Gęsikiewicz Paweł Horodecki
author_facet	Andrzej M. Jagodziński Marcin K. Dyderski Kamil Gęsikiewicz Paweł Horodecki
author_sort	Andrzej M. Jagodziński
title	Consequences of different sample drying temperatures for accuracy of biomass inventories in forest ecosystems
title_short	Consequences of different sample drying temperatures for accuracy of biomass inventories in forest ecosystems
title_full	Consequences of different sample drying temperatures for accuracy of biomass inventories in forest ecosystems
title_fullStr	Consequences of different sample drying temperatures for accuracy of biomass inventories in forest ecosystems
title_full_unstemmed	Consequences of different sample drying temperatures for accuracy of biomass inventories in forest ecosystems
title_sort	consequences of different sample drying temperatures for accuracy of biomass inventories in forest ecosystems
publisher	Nature Portfolio
publishDate	2020
url	https://doaj.org/article/1653ac22e8594404b1c3d5d08a71057f
work_keys_str_mv	AT andrzejmjagodzinski consequencesofdifferentsampledryingtemperaturesforaccuracyofbiomassinventoriesinforestecosystems AT marcinkdyderski consequencesofdifferentsampledryingtemperaturesforaccuracyofbiomassinventoriesinforestecosystems AT kamilgesikiewicz consequencesofdifferentsampledryingtemperaturesforaccuracyofbiomassinventoriesinforestecosystems AT pawełhorodecki consequencesofdifferentsampledryingtemperaturesforaccuracyofbiomassinventoriesinforestecosystems
_version_	1718377429685239808

Consequences of different sample drying temperatures for accuracy of biomass inventories in forest ecosystems

Ejemplares similares