Empirical assessment of seismic design hazard’s exceedance area

Abstract Design ground motion intensities determine the actions for which structures are checked, in the conventional approach of seismic codes, not to fail the target performances. On the other hand, due to inherent characteristics of probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA), it is expected tha...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Iunio Iervolino, Antonio Vitale, Pasquale Cito
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/16a4ec5b811c49b38565b6bbf53e7bf2
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:16a4ec5b811c49b38565b6bbf53e7bf2
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:16a4ec5b811c49b38565b6bbf53e7bf22021-12-02T17:26:49ZEmpirical assessment of seismic design hazard’s exceedance area10.1038/s41598-021-98388-92045-2322https://doaj.org/article/16a4ec5b811c49b38565b6bbf53e7bf22021-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-98388-9https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Design ground motion intensities determine the actions for which structures are checked, in the conventional approach of seismic codes, not to fail the target performances. On the other hand, due to inherent characteristics of probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA), it is expected that site-specific design intensity based on PSHA is exceeded in the epicentral area of moderate-to-high magnitude earthquakes. In the context of regional seismic loss assessment and of the evolution of seismic codes from the regulator perspective, it is useful to gather insights about the extent of the zone around the earthquake source where code-conforming structures are expected to be systematically exposed to seismic actions larger than those accounted for in design. To assess such areal extent based on empirical evidence is the scope of the study presented in the paper. To this aim, peak ground acceleration ShakeMap data for Italian earthquakes from 2008 to 2020 were compared to the current design intensities in the same areas for which the maps are available. This allowed, first, to develop simple semi-empirical models of the exceedance area versus the magnitude of the earthquakes. Second, it allowed to model the probability that an earthquake of given magnitude causes exceedance of the design intensity via logistic regressions. Coupling the first and second class of models provides an approximation of the expected exceedance (logarithmic) area upon occurrence of an earthquake of given magnitude. Such an area can be of several thousand square kilometers for earthquakes occurring relatively frequently in countries such as Italy.Iunio IervolinoAntonio VitalePasquale CitoNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-7 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Iunio Iervolino
Antonio Vitale
Pasquale Cito
Empirical assessment of seismic design hazard’s exceedance area
description Abstract Design ground motion intensities determine the actions for which structures are checked, in the conventional approach of seismic codes, not to fail the target performances. On the other hand, due to inherent characteristics of probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA), it is expected that site-specific design intensity based on PSHA is exceeded in the epicentral area of moderate-to-high magnitude earthquakes. In the context of regional seismic loss assessment and of the evolution of seismic codes from the regulator perspective, it is useful to gather insights about the extent of the zone around the earthquake source where code-conforming structures are expected to be systematically exposed to seismic actions larger than those accounted for in design. To assess such areal extent based on empirical evidence is the scope of the study presented in the paper. To this aim, peak ground acceleration ShakeMap data for Italian earthquakes from 2008 to 2020 were compared to the current design intensities in the same areas for which the maps are available. This allowed, first, to develop simple semi-empirical models of the exceedance area versus the magnitude of the earthquakes. Second, it allowed to model the probability that an earthquake of given magnitude causes exceedance of the design intensity via logistic regressions. Coupling the first and second class of models provides an approximation of the expected exceedance (logarithmic) area upon occurrence of an earthquake of given magnitude. Such an area can be of several thousand square kilometers for earthquakes occurring relatively frequently in countries such as Italy.
format article
author Iunio Iervolino
Antonio Vitale
Pasquale Cito
author_facet Iunio Iervolino
Antonio Vitale
Pasquale Cito
author_sort Iunio Iervolino
title Empirical assessment of seismic design hazard’s exceedance area
title_short Empirical assessment of seismic design hazard’s exceedance area
title_full Empirical assessment of seismic design hazard’s exceedance area
title_fullStr Empirical assessment of seismic design hazard’s exceedance area
title_full_unstemmed Empirical assessment of seismic design hazard’s exceedance area
title_sort empirical assessment of seismic design hazard’s exceedance area
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/16a4ec5b811c49b38565b6bbf53e7bf2
work_keys_str_mv AT iunioiervolino empiricalassessmentofseismicdesignhazardsexceedancearea
AT antoniovitale empiricalassessmentofseismicdesignhazardsexceedancearea
AT pasqualecito empiricalassessmentofseismicdesignhazardsexceedancearea
_version_ 1718380775749976064