Population affinity and variation of sexual dimorphism in three-dimensional facial forms: comparisons between Turkish and Japanese populations

Abstract Examining the extent to which sex differences in three-dimensional (3D) facial soft tissue configurations are similar across diverse populations could suggest the source of the indirect evolutionary benefits of facial sexual dimorphism traits. To explore this idea, we selected two geographi...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chihiro Tanikawa, M. Okan Akcam, Hatice Gokalp, Edlira Zere, Kenji Takada
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/16b4ee06e3064828bcafc3487f38a6f4
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:16b4ee06e3064828bcafc3487f38a6f4
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:16b4ee06e3064828bcafc3487f38a6f42021-12-02T18:51:52ZPopulation affinity and variation of sexual dimorphism in three-dimensional facial forms: comparisons between Turkish and Japanese populations10.1038/s41598-021-96029-92045-2322https://doaj.org/article/16b4ee06e3064828bcafc3487f38a6f42021-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96029-9https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Examining the extent to which sex differences in three-dimensional (3D) facial soft tissue configurations are similar across diverse populations could suggest the source of the indirect evolutionary benefits of facial sexual dimorphism traits. To explore this idea, we selected two geographically distinct populations. Three-dimensional model faces were derived from 272 Turkish and Japanese men and women; their facial morphologies were evaluated using landmark and surface-based analyses. We found four common facial features related to sexual dimorphism. Both Turkish and Japanese females had a shorter lower face height, a flatter forehead, greater sagittal cheek protrusion in the infraorbital region but less prominence of the cheek in the parotid-masseteric region, and an antero-posteriorly smaller nose when compared with their male counterparts. The results indicated the possible phylogenetic contribution of the masticatory organ function and morphogenesis on sexual dimorphism of the human face in addition to previously reported biological and psychological characteristics, including sexual maturity, reproductive potential, mating success, general health, immune response, age, and personality.Chihiro TanikawaM. Okan AkcamHatice GokalpEdlira ZereKenji TakadaNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-14 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Chihiro Tanikawa
M. Okan Akcam
Hatice Gokalp
Edlira Zere
Kenji Takada
Population affinity and variation of sexual dimorphism in three-dimensional facial forms: comparisons between Turkish and Japanese populations
description Abstract Examining the extent to which sex differences in three-dimensional (3D) facial soft tissue configurations are similar across diverse populations could suggest the source of the indirect evolutionary benefits of facial sexual dimorphism traits. To explore this idea, we selected two geographically distinct populations. Three-dimensional model faces were derived from 272 Turkish and Japanese men and women; their facial morphologies were evaluated using landmark and surface-based analyses. We found four common facial features related to sexual dimorphism. Both Turkish and Japanese females had a shorter lower face height, a flatter forehead, greater sagittal cheek protrusion in the infraorbital region but less prominence of the cheek in the parotid-masseteric region, and an antero-posteriorly smaller nose when compared with their male counterparts. The results indicated the possible phylogenetic contribution of the masticatory organ function and morphogenesis on sexual dimorphism of the human face in addition to previously reported biological and psychological characteristics, including sexual maturity, reproductive potential, mating success, general health, immune response, age, and personality.
format article
author Chihiro Tanikawa
M. Okan Akcam
Hatice Gokalp
Edlira Zere
Kenji Takada
author_facet Chihiro Tanikawa
M. Okan Akcam
Hatice Gokalp
Edlira Zere
Kenji Takada
author_sort Chihiro Tanikawa
title Population affinity and variation of sexual dimorphism in three-dimensional facial forms: comparisons between Turkish and Japanese populations
title_short Population affinity and variation of sexual dimorphism in three-dimensional facial forms: comparisons between Turkish and Japanese populations
title_full Population affinity and variation of sexual dimorphism in three-dimensional facial forms: comparisons between Turkish and Japanese populations
title_fullStr Population affinity and variation of sexual dimorphism in three-dimensional facial forms: comparisons between Turkish and Japanese populations
title_full_unstemmed Population affinity and variation of sexual dimorphism in three-dimensional facial forms: comparisons between Turkish and Japanese populations
title_sort population affinity and variation of sexual dimorphism in three-dimensional facial forms: comparisons between turkish and japanese populations
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/16b4ee06e3064828bcafc3487f38a6f4
work_keys_str_mv AT chihirotanikawa populationaffinityandvariationofsexualdimorphisminthreedimensionalfacialformscomparisonsbetweenturkishandjapanesepopulations
AT mokanakcam populationaffinityandvariationofsexualdimorphisminthreedimensionalfacialformscomparisonsbetweenturkishandjapanesepopulations
AT haticegokalp populationaffinityandvariationofsexualdimorphisminthreedimensionalfacialformscomparisonsbetweenturkishandjapanesepopulations
AT edlirazere populationaffinityandvariationofsexualdimorphisminthreedimensionalfacialformscomparisonsbetweenturkishandjapanesepopulations
AT kenjitakada populationaffinityandvariationofsexualdimorphisminthreedimensionalfacialformscomparisonsbetweenturkishandjapanesepopulations
_version_ 1718377371507097600