Comparing public support for wildlife protection and climate protection

In this study we provide a detailed analysis and comparison of the public support for climate protection and wildlife protection using nationally representative data from the Czech Republic. The results of regression analyses have shown that support for both protections is significantly increasing...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Jan Krajhanzl, Tomáš Chabada
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	CS EN SK
Publicado:	Karolinum Press 2021
Materias:	Public support for climate protection Public support for wildlife protection Portrait Value Questionnaire New Ecological Paradigm Representative survey Czech Republic Special aspects of education LC8-6691 Environmental sciences GE1-350
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/16c7001c3d43493cbefcd5e22ef258ef
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:16c7001c3d43493cbefcd5e22ef258ef
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:16c7001c3d43493cbefcd5e22ef258ef2021-11-05T20:40:59ZComparing public support for wildlife protection and climate protection10.14712/18023061.6241802-3061https://doaj.org/article/16c7001c3d43493cbefcd5e22ef258ef2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.envigogika.czp.cuni.cz/index.php/Envigogika/article/view/624https://doaj.org/toc/1802-3061 In this study we provide a detailed analysis and comparison of the public support for climate protection and wildlife protection using nationally representative data from the Czech Republic. The results of regression analyses have shown that support for both protections is significantly increasing with growing pro-environmental beliefs of people, leisure time they spent in nature and their altruism. Support for climate protection also rises with higher election participation, left-wing political orientation and younger age. Support for wildlife protection increases with growing trust in non-profit organizations while decreases with growing trust in science & research institutions. The comparison of groups defined according to their consent with climate protection and wildlife protection showed that support for wildlife protection can be characterized as a more inclusive environmental attitude than support for climate protection. The paper discusses the implications of these findings for protagonists of environmental politics and ways how they approach the public. Jan KrajhanzlTomáš ChabadaKarolinum PressarticlePublic support for climate protectionPublic support for wildlife protectionPortrait Value QuestionnaireNew Ecological ParadigmRepresentative surveyCzech RepublicSpecial aspects of educationLC8-6691Environmental sciencesGE1-350CSENSKEnvigogika, Vol 16, Iss 1 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	CS EN SK
topic	Public support for climate protection Public support for wildlife protection Portrait Value Questionnaire New Ecological Paradigm Representative survey Czech Republic Special aspects of education LC8-6691 Environmental sciences GE1-350
spellingShingle	Public support for climate protection Public support for wildlife protection Portrait Value Questionnaire New Ecological Paradigm Representative survey Czech Republic Special aspects of education LC8-6691 Environmental sciences GE1-350 Jan Krajhanzl Tomáš Chabada Comparing public support for wildlife protection and climate protection
description	In this study we provide a detailed analysis and comparison of the public support for climate protection and wildlife protection using nationally representative data from the Czech Republic. The results of regression analyses have shown that support for both protections is significantly increasing with growing pro-environmental beliefs of people, leisure time they spent in nature and their altruism. Support for climate protection also rises with higher election participation, left-wing political orientation and younger age. Support for wildlife protection increases with growing trust in non-profit organizations while decreases with growing trust in science & research institutions. The comparison of groups defined according to their consent with climate protection and wildlife protection showed that support for wildlife protection can be characterized as a more inclusive environmental attitude than support for climate protection. The paper discusses the implications of these findings for protagonists of environmental politics and ways how they approach the public.
format	article
author	Jan Krajhanzl Tomáš Chabada
author_facet	Jan Krajhanzl Tomáš Chabada
author_sort	Jan Krajhanzl
title	Comparing public support for wildlife protection and climate protection
title_short	Comparing public support for wildlife protection and climate protection
title_full	Comparing public support for wildlife protection and climate protection
title_fullStr	Comparing public support for wildlife protection and climate protection
title_full_unstemmed	Comparing public support for wildlife protection and climate protection
title_sort	comparing public support for wildlife protection and climate protection
publisher	Karolinum Press
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/16c7001c3d43493cbefcd5e22ef258ef
work_keys_str_mv	AT jankrajhanzl comparingpublicsupportforwildlifeprotectionandclimateprotection AT tomaschabada comparingpublicsupportforwildlifeprotectionandclimateprotection
_version_	1718444022585884672

Comparing public support for wildlife protection and climate protection

Ejemplares similares