Main challenges and key features of indicator-based agroecological assessment frameworks in the context of international cooperation

Agroecology increasingly gains importance in the discussion about sustainable food systems. To facilitate the transition from conventional farming to agroecological farming, adequate methods and concepts to measure and assess impact and productivity of agroecological farming systems (AFSs) are neede...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Milena Wiget, Adrian Muller, Angelika Hilbeck
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Resilience Alliance 2020
Materias:	agroecological assessment frameworks agroecological transition farmers&#8217 involvement indicator interaction multifunctionality Biology (General) QH301-705.5 Ecology QH540-549.5
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/16e77e93b127466db0bfac9c0f1e33cc
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:16e77e93b127466db0bfac9c0f1e33cc
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:16e77e93b127466db0bfac9c0f1e33cc2021-12-02T14:14:41ZMain challenges and key features of indicator-based agroecological assessment frameworks in the context of international cooperation1708-308710.5751/ES-11774-250325https://doaj.org/article/16e77e93b127466db0bfac9c0f1e33cc2020-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol25/iss3/art25/https://doaj.org/toc/1708-3087Agroecology increasingly gains importance in the discussion about sustainable food systems. To facilitate the transition from conventional farming to agroecological farming, adequate methods and concepts to measure and assess impact and productivity of agroecological farming systems (AFSs) are needed, which consider their multifunctionality and other specific characteristics, here called agroecological sustainability assessment frameworks and tools (ASAFTs). In the past years, many agricultural sustainability assessment tools and frameworks were developed but their suitability and applicability to AFSs was not investigated. To close this knowledge gap, we aimed at identifying, reviewing, and discussing published ASAFTs in the context of international cooperation, providing an overview of the current challenges, needs, and requirements in assessing AFSs at the farm level with the means of indicators. Desktop and scientific database research was conducted to identify and discuss published indicator-based ASAFTs at the farm level. The analysis was based on the following four framework elements that the authors considered to be essential for ASAFTs: (1) the adaptability to local conditions all over the world, (2) the involvement of farmers in the development process, (3) the consideration of the multiple functions of an agroecosystem in the definition and measurement of its productivity, and (4) the accounting for interactions between multiple agroecosystem functions and their measurement. Only a few analyzed assessment frameworks at least partly consider these essential elements and were designed specifically for AFSs. However, our study also showed that these frameworks were (1) restricted in their geographical application scope, (2) quite heterogeneous and barely comparable, and (3) based on productivity indicators that do not fully capture the multiple functions of AFSs. Therefore, we identified the need for the development of appropriate agroecological productivity indicators and common standard or reference frameworks for assessing AFSs, which will be crucial for upscaling agroecology.Milena WigetAdrian MullerAngelika HilbeckResilience Alliancearticleagroecological assessment frameworksagroecological transitionfarmers&#8217involvementindicator interactionmultifunctionalityBiology (General)QH301-705.5EcologyQH540-549.5ENEcology and Society, Vol 25, Iss 3, p 25 (2020)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	agroecological assessment frameworks agroecological transition farmers&#8217 involvement indicator interaction multifunctionality Biology (General) QH301-705.5 Ecology QH540-549.5
spellingShingle	agroecological assessment frameworks agroecological transition farmers&#8217 involvement indicator interaction multifunctionality Biology (General) QH301-705.5 Ecology QH540-549.5 Milena Wiget Adrian Muller Angelika Hilbeck Main challenges and key features of indicator-based agroecological assessment frameworks in the context of international cooperation
description	Agroecology increasingly gains importance in the discussion about sustainable food systems. To facilitate the transition from conventional farming to agroecological farming, adequate methods and concepts to measure and assess impact and productivity of agroecological farming systems (AFSs) are needed, which consider their multifunctionality and other specific characteristics, here called agroecological sustainability assessment frameworks and tools (ASAFTs). In the past years, many agricultural sustainability assessment tools and frameworks were developed but their suitability and applicability to AFSs was not investigated. To close this knowledge gap, we aimed at identifying, reviewing, and discussing published ASAFTs in the context of international cooperation, providing an overview of the current challenges, needs, and requirements in assessing AFSs at the farm level with the means of indicators. Desktop and scientific database research was conducted to identify and discuss published indicator-based ASAFTs at the farm level. The analysis was based on the following four framework elements that the authors considered to be essential for ASAFTs: (1) the adaptability to local conditions all over the world, (2) the involvement of farmers in the development process, (3) the consideration of the multiple functions of an agroecosystem in the definition and measurement of its productivity, and (4) the accounting for interactions between multiple agroecosystem functions and their measurement. Only a few analyzed assessment frameworks at least partly consider these essential elements and were designed specifically for AFSs. However, our study also showed that these frameworks were (1) restricted in their geographical application scope, (2) quite heterogeneous and barely comparable, and (3) based on productivity indicators that do not fully capture the multiple functions of AFSs. Therefore, we identified the need for the development of appropriate agroecological productivity indicators and common standard or reference frameworks for assessing AFSs, which will be crucial for upscaling agroecology.
format	article
author	Milena Wiget Adrian Muller Angelika Hilbeck
author_facet	Milena Wiget Adrian Muller Angelika Hilbeck
author_sort	Milena Wiget
title	Main challenges and key features of indicator-based agroecological assessment frameworks in the context of international cooperation
title_short	Main challenges and key features of indicator-based agroecological assessment frameworks in the context of international cooperation
title_full	Main challenges and key features of indicator-based agroecological assessment frameworks in the context of international cooperation
title_fullStr	Main challenges and key features of indicator-based agroecological assessment frameworks in the context of international cooperation
title_full_unstemmed	Main challenges and key features of indicator-based agroecological assessment frameworks in the context of international cooperation
title_sort	main challenges and key features of indicator-based agroecological assessment frameworks in the context of international cooperation
publisher	Resilience Alliance
publishDate	2020
url	https://doaj.org/article/16e77e93b127466db0bfac9c0f1e33cc
work_keys_str_mv	AT milenawiget mainchallengesandkeyfeaturesofindicatorbasedagroecologicalassessmentframeworksinthecontextofinternationalcooperation AT adrianmuller mainchallengesandkeyfeaturesofindicatorbasedagroecologicalassessmentframeworksinthecontextofinternationalcooperation AT angelikahilbeck mainchallengesandkeyfeaturesofindicatorbasedagroecologicalassessmentframeworksinthecontextofinternationalcooperation
_version_	1718391710172577792

Main challenges and key features of indicator-based agroecological assessment frameworks in the context of international cooperation

Ejemplares similares