Percutaneous left ventricular assist device vs. intra-aortic balloon pump in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction undergoing cardiovascular intervention: A meta-analysis
Objective: Although controversial, the intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) and percutaneous left ventricular assist device (PLVAD) are widely used for initial hemodynamic stabilization. We performed a meta-analysis to compare the clinical outcomes of these two devices in patients with severe left ventr...
Enregistré dans:
Auteurs principaux: | Fang-Bin Hu, Lian-Qun Cui |
---|---|
Format: | article |
Langue: | EN |
Publié: |
KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.
2018
|
Sujets: | |
Accès en ligne: | https://doaj.org/article/16f109ee48dd43ff8d2a387fca8b5794 |
Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
Documents similaires
-
Factors associated with left ventricular reverse remodelling after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction
par: Yusuke Adachi, et autres
Publié: (2021) -
Aortic Root Thrombus Directly After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation
par: Constantin Mork, MD, et autres
Publié: (2021) -
Choosing Between Left Ventricular Assist Devices and Biventricular Assist Devices
par: Sajad Shehab, et autres
Publié: (2019) -
Intra-aortic balloon pump. A cheap device to protect CHIP?
par: Giuseppe Andò, et autres
Publié: (2020) -
Subclinical Left Ventricular Dysfunction During Chemotherapy
par: Martin Nicol, et autres
Publié: (2019)