Systematic review and standardised assessment of Chinese cross-cultural adapted hip Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs).
<h4>Purpose</h4>To perform a systemic literature search to identify Chinese cross culturally adapted and new designed Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) used for hip assessment, then a standardized evaluation of available instruments in order to provide evidence of high-quality PR...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/170e93c2d665450eac68780561496d54 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:170e93c2d665450eac68780561496d54 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:170e93c2d665450eac68780561496d542021-12-02T20:08:10ZSystematic review and standardised assessment of Chinese cross-cultural adapted hip Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs).1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0257081https://doaj.org/article/170e93c2d665450eac68780561496d542021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257081https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Purpose</h4>To perform a systemic literature search to identify Chinese cross culturally adapted and new designed Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) used for hip assessment, then a standardized evaluation of available instruments in order to provide evidence of high-quality PROMs for clinical use and adoption in future hip registries.<h4>Methods</h4>A Systematic Review of the following databases: PUBMED, CINAHL, EMBASE, CNKI was performed to identify relevant PROMs. Instruments underwent standardized assessment and scoring using the EMPRO tool by two independent reviewers. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC).<h4>Results</h4>2188 articles were retrieved, with seven articles fitting the inclusion criteria consisting of six hip PROMs. Five PROMs were cross culturally adapted and one was originally designed in Mandarin Chinese. Total scores (/100) after EMPRO evaluation: Osteoarthritis of Knee and Hip Quality of Life (OAKHQOL): 55; Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS): 52; International Hip Outcome Tool (SC-iHOT-33): 45; Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS): 37; Questionnaire on the Perceptions and Functions of Patients about Total Hip Arthroplasty (QPFPTHA): 36; Oxford Hip Score (OHS): 35. ICC values were 0.73 for the SC-iHOT-33 and ranged between 0.83-0.93 for the other PROMs indicating good to excellent inter-rater agreement.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Among the commonly used hip-specific PROMs found in arthroplasty registries, none of the Chinese adapted versions evaluated by EMPRO is currently rated acceptable for clinical use. Only OAKHQOL and HAGOS reached acceptability threshold. Further research on the attributes of cross-cultural adaptation, interpretability and burden assessment would be helpful.James Reeves Mbori NgwayiJie TanNing LiangEmmanuel Gildas Eric SitaKenedy Uzoma ObieDaniel Edward PorterPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 9, p e0257081 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q James Reeves Mbori Ngwayi Jie Tan Ning Liang Emmanuel Gildas Eric Sita Kenedy Uzoma Obie Daniel Edward Porter Systematic review and standardised assessment of Chinese cross-cultural adapted hip Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). |
description |
<h4>Purpose</h4>To perform a systemic literature search to identify Chinese cross culturally adapted and new designed Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) used for hip assessment, then a standardized evaluation of available instruments in order to provide evidence of high-quality PROMs for clinical use and adoption in future hip registries.<h4>Methods</h4>A Systematic Review of the following databases: PUBMED, CINAHL, EMBASE, CNKI was performed to identify relevant PROMs. Instruments underwent standardized assessment and scoring using the EMPRO tool by two independent reviewers. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC).<h4>Results</h4>2188 articles were retrieved, with seven articles fitting the inclusion criteria consisting of six hip PROMs. Five PROMs were cross culturally adapted and one was originally designed in Mandarin Chinese. Total scores (/100) after EMPRO evaluation: Osteoarthritis of Knee and Hip Quality of Life (OAKHQOL): 55; Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS): 52; International Hip Outcome Tool (SC-iHOT-33): 45; Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS): 37; Questionnaire on the Perceptions and Functions of Patients about Total Hip Arthroplasty (QPFPTHA): 36; Oxford Hip Score (OHS): 35. ICC values were 0.73 for the SC-iHOT-33 and ranged between 0.83-0.93 for the other PROMs indicating good to excellent inter-rater agreement.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Among the commonly used hip-specific PROMs found in arthroplasty registries, none of the Chinese adapted versions evaluated by EMPRO is currently rated acceptable for clinical use. Only OAKHQOL and HAGOS reached acceptability threshold. Further research on the attributes of cross-cultural adaptation, interpretability and burden assessment would be helpful. |
format |
article |
author |
James Reeves Mbori Ngwayi Jie Tan Ning Liang Emmanuel Gildas Eric Sita Kenedy Uzoma Obie Daniel Edward Porter |
author_facet |
James Reeves Mbori Ngwayi Jie Tan Ning Liang Emmanuel Gildas Eric Sita Kenedy Uzoma Obie Daniel Edward Porter |
author_sort |
James Reeves Mbori Ngwayi |
title |
Systematic review and standardised assessment of Chinese cross-cultural adapted hip Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). |
title_short |
Systematic review and standardised assessment of Chinese cross-cultural adapted hip Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). |
title_full |
Systematic review and standardised assessment of Chinese cross-cultural adapted hip Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). |
title_fullStr |
Systematic review and standardised assessment of Chinese cross-cultural adapted hip Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). |
title_full_unstemmed |
Systematic review and standardised assessment of Chinese cross-cultural adapted hip Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). |
title_sort |
systematic review and standardised assessment of chinese cross-cultural adapted hip patient reported outcome measures (proms). |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/170e93c2d665450eac68780561496d54 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jamesreevesmboringwayi systematicreviewandstandardisedassessmentofchinesecrossculturaladaptedhippatientreportedoutcomemeasuresproms AT jietan systematicreviewandstandardisedassessmentofchinesecrossculturaladaptedhippatientreportedoutcomemeasuresproms AT ningliang systematicreviewandstandardisedassessmentofchinesecrossculturaladaptedhippatientreportedoutcomemeasuresproms AT emmanuelgildasericsita systematicreviewandstandardisedassessmentofchinesecrossculturaladaptedhippatientreportedoutcomemeasuresproms AT kenedyuzomaobie systematicreviewandstandardisedassessmentofchinesecrossculturaladaptedhippatientreportedoutcomemeasuresproms AT danieledwardporter systematicreviewandstandardisedassessmentofchinesecrossculturaladaptedhippatientreportedoutcomemeasuresproms |
_version_ |
1718375166088577024 |