Recurrence risk after a first remote symptomatic seizure in adults: Epilepsy or not?

Abstract The ILAE practical definition of epilepsy has a one seizure possibility to diagnose epilepsy after a first seizure if the recurrence risk is very high. The recurrence risk after a first seizure in brain disorders (first remote seizure) is often high, but varies with etiology, so more specif...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Johan Zelano
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Wiley 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/1712658646b64ba7865426d49d1cb0a3
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:1712658646b64ba7865426d49d1cb0a3
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:1712658646b64ba7865426d49d1cb0a32021-12-01T06:09:19ZRecurrence risk after a first remote symptomatic seizure in adults: Epilepsy or not?2470-923910.1002/epi4.12543https://doaj.org/article/1712658646b64ba7865426d49d1cb0a32021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12543https://doaj.org/toc/2470-9239Abstract The ILAE practical definition of epilepsy has a one seizure possibility to diagnose epilepsy after a first seizure if the recurrence risk is very high. The recurrence risk after a first seizure in brain disorders (first remote seizure) is often high, but varies with etiology, so more specific information is needed for clinical practice. This review describes etiology‐specific recurrence risks in adults with a first remote seizure in stroke, traumatic brain injury, infections, dementia, multiple sclerosis, and tumors. Most studies are short, single center, and retrospective. Inclusion criteria, outcome ascertainment, and results vary. Few patient categories are clearly above the epilepsy threshold of recurrence risk, and there are surprisingly little data for important etiologies like brain infections. Beside stroke, severe TBI could have a sufficiently high recurrence risk for early epilepsy diagnosis, but more studies are needed, preferably prospective ones. The literature is uninformative regarding which seizures qualify as remote. The clinical implication of the low level of available evidence is that for other etiologies than stroke, seizure recurrence remains the most appropriate indicator of epilepsy for most patients with a first remote seizure. Nonetheless, there are worrying indications of a diagnostic drift, which puts patients with a preexisting brain disorder at risk of misdiagnosis. Although there are drawbacks to an intermediate term like “possible epilepsy,” it could perhaps be useful in cases when the recurrence risk is high, but epilepsy criteria are not definitely met after a first remote seizure.Johan ZelanoWileyarticlediagnosisremote seizureseizure recurrenceunprovoked seizureNeurology. Diseases of the nervous systemRC346-429ENEpilepsia Open, Vol 6, Iss 4, Pp 634-644 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic diagnosis
remote seizure
seizure recurrence
unprovoked seizure
Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system
RC346-429
spellingShingle diagnosis
remote seizure
seizure recurrence
unprovoked seizure
Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system
RC346-429
Johan Zelano
Recurrence risk after a first remote symptomatic seizure in adults: Epilepsy or not?
description Abstract The ILAE practical definition of epilepsy has a one seizure possibility to diagnose epilepsy after a first seizure if the recurrence risk is very high. The recurrence risk after a first seizure in brain disorders (first remote seizure) is often high, but varies with etiology, so more specific information is needed for clinical practice. This review describes etiology‐specific recurrence risks in adults with a first remote seizure in stroke, traumatic brain injury, infections, dementia, multiple sclerosis, and tumors. Most studies are short, single center, and retrospective. Inclusion criteria, outcome ascertainment, and results vary. Few patient categories are clearly above the epilepsy threshold of recurrence risk, and there are surprisingly little data for important etiologies like brain infections. Beside stroke, severe TBI could have a sufficiently high recurrence risk for early epilepsy diagnosis, but more studies are needed, preferably prospective ones. The literature is uninformative regarding which seizures qualify as remote. The clinical implication of the low level of available evidence is that for other etiologies than stroke, seizure recurrence remains the most appropriate indicator of epilepsy for most patients with a first remote seizure. Nonetheless, there are worrying indications of a diagnostic drift, which puts patients with a preexisting brain disorder at risk of misdiagnosis. Although there are drawbacks to an intermediate term like “possible epilepsy,” it could perhaps be useful in cases when the recurrence risk is high, but epilepsy criteria are not definitely met after a first remote seizure.
format article
author Johan Zelano
author_facet Johan Zelano
author_sort Johan Zelano
title Recurrence risk after a first remote symptomatic seizure in adults: Epilepsy or not?
title_short Recurrence risk after a first remote symptomatic seizure in adults: Epilepsy or not?
title_full Recurrence risk after a first remote symptomatic seizure in adults: Epilepsy or not?
title_fullStr Recurrence risk after a first remote symptomatic seizure in adults: Epilepsy or not?
title_full_unstemmed Recurrence risk after a first remote symptomatic seizure in adults: Epilepsy or not?
title_sort recurrence risk after a first remote symptomatic seizure in adults: epilepsy or not?
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/1712658646b64ba7865426d49d1cb0a3
work_keys_str_mv AT johanzelano recurrenceriskafterafirstremotesymptomaticseizureinadultsepilepsyornot
_version_ 1718405459362185216