Comparison of the Effect and Durability of Lumbar Stabilization and Global Postural Reeducation Exercises on Movement Control, Pain and Disability in Men with Lumbar Movement Control Dysfunction

Introduction: The global postural reeducation (GPR) method seems to be an effective method for the treatment of musculoskeletal disorders; therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the effect and durability of 6 weeks of GPR and lumbar stability exercises on movement control, pain and disabili...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abolfazl Rahmani, Hooman Minoonejad, Foad Seidi, Yousef Moghdas Tabrizi
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Zabol University of Medical sciences 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/1738c7aeb534440ca1f6acf44d051fa5
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:1738c7aeb534440ca1f6acf44d051fa5
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:1738c7aeb534440ca1f6acf44d051fa52021-11-17T09:55:03ZComparison of the Effect and Durability of Lumbar Stabilization and Global Postural Reeducation Exercises on Movement Control, Pain and Disability in Men with Lumbar Movement Control Dysfunction2476-664X10.34172/ijbsm.2021.3https://doaj.org/article/1738c7aeb534440ca1f6acf44d051fa52021-03-01T00:00:00Zhttp://ijbsm.zbmu.ac.ir/PDF/ijbsm-20434https://doaj.org/toc/2476-664XIntroduction: The global postural reeducation (GPR) method seems to be an effective method for the treatment of musculoskeletal disorders; therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the effect and durability of 6 weeks of GPR and lumbar stability exercises on movement control, pain and disability in men with chronic nonspecific low back pain (NSLBP) with lumbar movement control dysfunction.Methods: Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 46 men with non-specific chronic low back pain (LBP) with lumbar movement control dysfunction were selected and randomly divided into three groups (two exercise groups - one control group). Training intervention groups practiced for six weeks, three sessions per week. Visual analogue scale (VAS), Roland Morris questionnaire, and movement control test were used to measure pain, level of physical disability, and lumbar movement control, respectively. Repeated measures ANOVA was utilized to compare the effect and durability of the two training protocols on the dependent variables at a significant level.Results: Results from this research showed that both types of exercises reduced pain (P = 0.001) and improved disability index (P = 0.001) and lumbar movement control (P = 0.001). Our findings suggested that a GPR intervention for 6 weeks (P = 0.040) and inactivity for 4 weeks (P = 0.001) resulted in a greater improvement in disability compared to the lumbar stabilization exercises (LSEs). Conclusion: Both types of exercises seem to be effective in improving lumbar movement control, pain, and disability in people with movement control dysfunction after both training and inactivity. The GPR method improved disability more than the LSEs.Abolfazl RahmaniHooman MinoonejadFoad SeidiYousef Moghdas TabriziZabol University of Medical sciencesarticlelow back pain global postural reeducation stabilization exercises disability motor control impairment Medicine (General)R5-920ENInternational Journal of Basic Science in Medicine, Vol 6, Iss 1, Pp 17-24 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic low back pain
global postural reeducation
stabilization exercises
disability
motor control impairment

Medicine (General)
R5-920
spellingShingle low back pain
global postural reeducation
stabilization exercises
disability
motor control impairment

Medicine (General)
R5-920
Abolfazl Rahmani
Hooman Minoonejad
Foad Seidi
Yousef Moghdas Tabrizi
Comparison of the Effect and Durability of Lumbar Stabilization and Global Postural Reeducation Exercises on Movement Control, Pain and Disability in Men with Lumbar Movement Control Dysfunction
description Introduction: The global postural reeducation (GPR) method seems to be an effective method for the treatment of musculoskeletal disorders; therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the effect and durability of 6 weeks of GPR and lumbar stability exercises on movement control, pain and disability in men with chronic nonspecific low back pain (NSLBP) with lumbar movement control dysfunction.Methods: Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 46 men with non-specific chronic low back pain (LBP) with lumbar movement control dysfunction were selected and randomly divided into three groups (two exercise groups - one control group). Training intervention groups practiced for six weeks, three sessions per week. Visual analogue scale (VAS), Roland Morris questionnaire, and movement control test were used to measure pain, level of physical disability, and lumbar movement control, respectively. Repeated measures ANOVA was utilized to compare the effect and durability of the two training protocols on the dependent variables at a significant level.Results: Results from this research showed that both types of exercises reduced pain (P = 0.001) and improved disability index (P = 0.001) and lumbar movement control (P = 0.001). Our findings suggested that a GPR intervention for 6 weeks (P = 0.040) and inactivity for 4 weeks (P = 0.001) resulted in a greater improvement in disability compared to the lumbar stabilization exercises (LSEs). Conclusion: Both types of exercises seem to be effective in improving lumbar movement control, pain, and disability in people with movement control dysfunction after both training and inactivity. The GPR method improved disability more than the LSEs.
format article
author Abolfazl Rahmani
Hooman Minoonejad
Foad Seidi
Yousef Moghdas Tabrizi
author_facet Abolfazl Rahmani
Hooman Minoonejad
Foad Seidi
Yousef Moghdas Tabrizi
author_sort Abolfazl Rahmani
title Comparison of the Effect and Durability of Lumbar Stabilization and Global Postural Reeducation Exercises on Movement Control, Pain and Disability in Men with Lumbar Movement Control Dysfunction
title_short Comparison of the Effect and Durability of Lumbar Stabilization and Global Postural Reeducation Exercises on Movement Control, Pain and Disability in Men with Lumbar Movement Control Dysfunction
title_full Comparison of the Effect and Durability of Lumbar Stabilization and Global Postural Reeducation Exercises on Movement Control, Pain and Disability in Men with Lumbar Movement Control Dysfunction
title_fullStr Comparison of the Effect and Durability of Lumbar Stabilization and Global Postural Reeducation Exercises on Movement Control, Pain and Disability in Men with Lumbar Movement Control Dysfunction
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Effect and Durability of Lumbar Stabilization and Global Postural Reeducation Exercises on Movement Control, Pain and Disability in Men with Lumbar Movement Control Dysfunction
title_sort comparison of the effect and durability of lumbar stabilization and global postural reeducation exercises on movement control, pain and disability in men with lumbar movement control dysfunction
publisher Zabol University of Medical sciences
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/1738c7aeb534440ca1f6acf44d051fa5
work_keys_str_mv AT abolfazlrahmani comparisonoftheeffectanddurabilityoflumbarstabilizationandglobalposturalreeducationexercisesonmovementcontrolpainanddisabilityinmenwithlumbarmovementcontroldysfunction
AT hoomanminoonejad comparisonoftheeffectanddurabilityoflumbarstabilizationandglobalposturalreeducationexercisesonmovementcontrolpainanddisabilityinmenwithlumbarmovementcontroldysfunction
AT foadseidi comparisonoftheeffectanddurabilityoflumbarstabilizationandglobalposturalreeducationexercisesonmovementcontrolpainanddisabilityinmenwithlumbarmovementcontroldysfunction
AT yousefmoghdastabrizi comparisonoftheeffectanddurabilityoflumbarstabilizationandglobalposturalreeducationexercisesonmovementcontrolpainanddisabilityinmenwithlumbarmovementcontroldysfunction
_version_ 1718425592549867520