Looking to score: the dissociation of goal influence on eye movement and meta-attentional allocation in a complex dynamic natural scene.

Several studies have reported that task instructions influence eye-movement behavior during static image observation. In contrast, during dynamic scene observation we show that while the specificity of the goal of a task influences observers' beliefs about where they look, the goal does not in...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shuichiro Taya, David Windridge, Magda Osman
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2012
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/173987771006481d8f5a5a22f0bf5b11
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:173987771006481d8f5a5a22f0bf5b11
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:173987771006481d8f5a5a22f0bf5b112021-11-18T07:14:00ZLooking to score: the dissociation of goal influence on eye movement and meta-attentional allocation in a complex dynamic natural scene.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0039060https://doaj.org/article/173987771006481d8f5a5a22f0bf5b112012-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/22768058/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Several studies have reported that task instructions influence eye-movement behavior during static image observation. In contrast, during dynamic scene observation we show that while the specificity of the goal of a task influences observers' beliefs about where they look, the goal does not in turn influence eye-movement patterns. In our study observers watched short video clips of a single tennis match and were asked to make subjective judgments about the allocation of visual attention to the items presented in the clip (e.g., ball, players, court lines, and umpire). However, before attending to the clips, observers were either told to simply watch clips (non-specific goal), or they were told to watch the clips with a view to judging which of the two tennis players was awarded the point (specific goal). The results of subjective reports suggest that observers believed that they allocated their attention more to goal-related items (e.g. court lines) if they performed the goal-specific task. However, we did not find the effect of goal specificity on major eye-movement parameters (i.e., saccadic amplitudes, inter-saccadic intervals, and gaze coherence). We conclude that the specificity of a task goal can alter observer's beliefs about their attention allocation strategy, but such task-driven meta-attentional modulation does not necessarily correlate with eye-movement behavior.Shuichiro TayaDavid WindridgeMagda OsmanPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 7, Iss 6, p e39060 (2012)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Shuichiro Taya
David Windridge
Magda Osman
Looking to score: the dissociation of goal influence on eye movement and meta-attentional allocation in a complex dynamic natural scene.
description Several studies have reported that task instructions influence eye-movement behavior during static image observation. In contrast, during dynamic scene observation we show that while the specificity of the goal of a task influences observers' beliefs about where they look, the goal does not in turn influence eye-movement patterns. In our study observers watched short video clips of a single tennis match and were asked to make subjective judgments about the allocation of visual attention to the items presented in the clip (e.g., ball, players, court lines, and umpire). However, before attending to the clips, observers were either told to simply watch clips (non-specific goal), or they were told to watch the clips with a view to judging which of the two tennis players was awarded the point (specific goal). The results of subjective reports suggest that observers believed that they allocated their attention more to goal-related items (e.g. court lines) if they performed the goal-specific task. However, we did not find the effect of goal specificity on major eye-movement parameters (i.e., saccadic amplitudes, inter-saccadic intervals, and gaze coherence). We conclude that the specificity of a task goal can alter observer's beliefs about their attention allocation strategy, but such task-driven meta-attentional modulation does not necessarily correlate with eye-movement behavior.
format article
author Shuichiro Taya
David Windridge
Magda Osman
author_facet Shuichiro Taya
David Windridge
Magda Osman
author_sort Shuichiro Taya
title Looking to score: the dissociation of goal influence on eye movement and meta-attentional allocation in a complex dynamic natural scene.
title_short Looking to score: the dissociation of goal influence on eye movement and meta-attentional allocation in a complex dynamic natural scene.
title_full Looking to score: the dissociation of goal influence on eye movement and meta-attentional allocation in a complex dynamic natural scene.
title_fullStr Looking to score: the dissociation of goal influence on eye movement and meta-attentional allocation in a complex dynamic natural scene.
title_full_unstemmed Looking to score: the dissociation of goal influence on eye movement and meta-attentional allocation in a complex dynamic natural scene.
title_sort looking to score: the dissociation of goal influence on eye movement and meta-attentional allocation in a complex dynamic natural scene.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2012
url https://doaj.org/article/173987771006481d8f5a5a22f0bf5b11
work_keys_str_mv AT shuichirotaya lookingtoscorethedissociationofgoalinfluenceoneyemovementandmetaattentionalallocationinacomplexdynamicnaturalscene
AT davidwindridge lookingtoscorethedissociationofgoalinfluenceoneyemovementandmetaattentionalallocationinacomplexdynamicnaturalscene
AT magdaosman lookingtoscorethedissociationofgoalinfluenceoneyemovementandmetaattentionalallocationinacomplexdynamicnaturalscene
_version_ 1718423711188516864