Antibody responses induced by SHIV infection are more focused than those induced by soluble native HIV-1 envelope trimers in non-human primates.

The development of an effective human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) vaccine is a high global health priority. Soluble native-like HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein trimers (Env), including those based on the SOSIP design, have shown promise as vaccine candidates by inducing neutralizing antibody response...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jelle van Schooten, Marlies M van Haaren, Hui Li, Laura E McCoy, Colin Havenar-Daughton, Christopher A Cottrell, Judith A Burger, Patricia van der Woude, Leanne C Helgers, Ilhan Tomris, Celia C Labranche, David C Montefiori, Andrew B Ward, Dennis R Burton, John P Moore, Rogier W Sanders, Shane Crotty, George M Shaw, Marit J van Gils
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/174a04f5de89452fb76d485c54ad2f16
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:174a04f5de89452fb76d485c54ad2f16
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:174a04f5de89452fb76d485c54ad2f162021-12-02T20:00:22ZAntibody responses induced by SHIV infection are more focused than those induced by soluble native HIV-1 envelope trimers in non-human primates.1553-73661553-737410.1371/journal.ppat.1009736https://doaj.org/article/174a04f5de89452fb76d485c54ad2f162021-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1009736https://doaj.org/toc/1553-7366https://doaj.org/toc/1553-7374The development of an effective human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) vaccine is a high global health priority. Soluble native-like HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein trimers (Env), including those based on the SOSIP design, have shown promise as vaccine candidates by inducing neutralizing antibody responses against the autologous virus in animal models. However, to overcome HIV-1's extreme diversity a vaccine needs to induce broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs). Such bNAbs can protect non-human primates (NHPs) and humans from infection. The prototypic BG505 SOSIP.664 immunogen is based on the BG505 env sequence isolated from an HIV-1-infected infant from Kenya who developed a bNAb response. Studying bNAb development during natural HIV-1 infection can inform vaccine design, however, it is unclear to what extent vaccine-induced antibody responses to Env are comparable to those induced by natural infection. Here, we compared Env antibody responses in BG505 SOSIP-immunized NHPs with those in BG505 SHIV-infected NHPs, by analyzing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). We observed three major differences between BG505 SOSIP immunization and BG505 SHIV infection. First, SHIV infection resulted in more clonal expansion and less antibody diversity compared to SOSIP immunization, likely because of higher and/or prolonged antigenic stimulation and increased antigen diversity during infection. Second, while we retrieved comparatively fewer neutralizing mAbs (NAbs) from SOSIP-immunized animals, these NAbs targeted more diverse epitopes compared to NAbs from SHIV-infected animals. However, none of the NAbs, either elicited by vaccination or infection, showed any breadth. Finally, SOSIP immunization elicited antibodies against the base of the trimer, while infection did not, consistent with the base being placed onto the virus membrane in the latter setting. Together these data provide new insights into the antibody response against BG505 Env during infection and immunization and limitations that need to be overcome to induce better responses after vaccination.Jelle van SchootenMarlies M van HaarenHui LiLaura E McCoyColin Havenar-DaughtonChristopher A CottrellJudith A BurgerPatricia van der WoudeLeanne C HelgersIlhan TomrisCelia C LabrancheDavid C MontefioriAndrew B WardDennis R BurtonJohn P MooreRogier W SandersShane CrottyGeorge M ShawMarit J van GilsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleImmunologic diseases. AllergyRC581-607Biology (General)QH301-705.5ENPLoS Pathogens, Vol 17, Iss 8, p e1009736 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Immunologic diseases. Allergy
RC581-607
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
spellingShingle Immunologic diseases. Allergy
RC581-607
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Jelle van Schooten
Marlies M van Haaren
Hui Li
Laura E McCoy
Colin Havenar-Daughton
Christopher A Cottrell
Judith A Burger
Patricia van der Woude
Leanne C Helgers
Ilhan Tomris
Celia C Labranche
David C Montefiori
Andrew B Ward
Dennis R Burton
John P Moore
Rogier W Sanders
Shane Crotty
George M Shaw
Marit J van Gils
Antibody responses induced by SHIV infection are more focused than those induced by soluble native HIV-1 envelope trimers in non-human primates.
description The development of an effective human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) vaccine is a high global health priority. Soluble native-like HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein trimers (Env), including those based on the SOSIP design, have shown promise as vaccine candidates by inducing neutralizing antibody responses against the autologous virus in animal models. However, to overcome HIV-1's extreme diversity a vaccine needs to induce broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs). Such bNAbs can protect non-human primates (NHPs) and humans from infection. The prototypic BG505 SOSIP.664 immunogen is based on the BG505 env sequence isolated from an HIV-1-infected infant from Kenya who developed a bNAb response. Studying bNAb development during natural HIV-1 infection can inform vaccine design, however, it is unclear to what extent vaccine-induced antibody responses to Env are comparable to those induced by natural infection. Here, we compared Env antibody responses in BG505 SOSIP-immunized NHPs with those in BG505 SHIV-infected NHPs, by analyzing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). We observed three major differences between BG505 SOSIP immunization and BG505 SHIV infection. First, SHIV infection resulted in more clonal expansion and less antibody diversity compared to SOSIP immunization, likely because of higher and/or prolonged antigenic stimulation and increased antigen diversity during infection. Second, while we retrieved comparatively fewer neutralizing mAbs (NAbs) from SOSIP-immunized animals, these NAbs targeted more diverse epitopes compared to NAbs from SHIV-infected animals. However, none of the NAbs, either elicited by vaccination or infection, showed any breadth. Finally, SOSIP immunization elicited antibodies against the base of the trimer, while infection did not, consistent with the base being placed onto the virus membrane in the latter setting. Together these data provide new insights into the antibody response against BG505 Env during infection and immunization and limitations that need to be overcome to induce better responses after vaccination.
format article
author Jelle van Schooten
Marlies M van Haaren
Hui Li
Laura E McCoy
Colin Havenar-Daughton
Christopher A Cottrell
Judith A Burger
Patricia van der Woude
Leanne C Helgers
Ilhan Tomris
Celia C Labranche
David C Montefiori
Andrew B Ward
Dennis R Burton
John P Moore
Rogier W Sanders
Shane Crotty
George M Shaw
Marit J van Gils
author_facet Jelle van Schooten
Marlies M van Haaren
Hui Li
Laura E McCoy
Colin Havenar-Daughton
Christopher A Cottrell
Judith A Burger
Patricia van der Woude
Leanne C Helgers
Ilhan Tomris
Celia C Labranche
David C Montefiori
Andrew B Ward
Dennis R Burton
John P Moore
Rogier W Sanders
Shane Crotty
George M Shaw
Marit J van Gils
author_sort Jelle van Schooten
title Antibody responses induced by SHIV infection are more focused than those induced by soluble native HIV-1 envelope trimers in non-human primates.
title_short Antibody responses induced by SHIV infection are more focused than those induced by soluble native HIV-1 envelope trimers in non-human primates.
title_full Antibody responses induced by SHIV infection are more focused than those induced by soluble native HIV-1 envelope trimers in non-human primates.
title_fullStr Antibody responses induced by SHIV infection are more focused than those induced by soluble native HIV-1 envelope trimers in non-human primates.
title_full_unstemmed Antibody responses induced by SHIV infection are more focused than those induced by soluble native HIV-1 envelope trimers in non-human primates.
title_sort antibody responses induced by shiv infection are more focused than those induced by soluble native hiv-1 envelope trimers in non-human primates.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/174a04f5de89452fb76d485c54ad2f16
work_keys_str_mv AT jellevanschooten antibodyresponsesinducedbyshivinfectionaremorefocusedthanthoseinducedbysolublenativehiv1envelopetrimersinnonhumanprimates
AT marliesmvanhaaren antibodyresponsesinducedbyshivinfectionaremorefocusedthanthoseinducedbysolublenativehiv1envelopetrimersinnonhumanprimates
AT huili antibodyresponsesinducedbyshivinfectionaremorefocusedthanthoseinducedbysolublenativehiv1envelopetrimersinnonhumanprimates
AT lauraemccoy antibodyresponsesinducedbyshivinfectionaremorefocusedthanthoseinducedbysolublenativehiv1envelopetrimersinnonhumanprimates
AT colinhavenardaughton antibodyresponsesinducedbyshivinfectionaremorefocusedthanthoseinducedbysolublenativehiv1envelopetrimersinnonhumanprimates
AT christopheracottrell antibodyresponsesinducedbyshivinfectionaremorefocusedthanthoseinducedbysolublenativehiv1envelopetrimersinnonhumanprimates
AT judithaburger antibodyresponsesinducedbyshivinfectionaremorefocusedthanthoseinducedbysolublenativehiv1envelopetrimersinnonhumanprimates
AT patriciavanderwoude antibodyresponsesinducedbyshivinfectionaremorefocusedthanthoseinducedbysolublenativehiv1envelopetrimersinnonhumanprimates
AT leannechelgers antibodyresponsesinducedbyshivinfectionaremorefocusedthanthoseinducedbysolublenativehiv1envelopetrimersinnonhumanprimates
AT ilhantomris antibodyresponsesinducedbyshivinfectionaremorefocusedthanthoseinducedbysolublenativehiv1envelopetrimersinnonhumanprimates
AT celiaclabranche antibodyresponsesinducedbyshivinfectionaremorefocusedthanthoseinducedbysolublenativehiv1envelopetrimersinnonhumanprimates
AT davidcmontefiori antibodyresponsesinducedbyshivinfectionaremorefocusedthanthoseinducedbysolublenativehiv1envelopetrimersinnonhumanprimates
AT andrewbward antibodyresponsesinducedbyshivinfectionaremorefocusedthanthoseinducedbysolublenativehiv1envelopetrimersinnonhumanprimates
AT dennisrburton antibodyresponsesinducedbyshivinfectionaremorefocusedthanthoseinducedbysolublenativehiv1envelopetrimersinnonhumanprimates
AT johnpmoore antibodyresponsesinducedbyshivinfectionaremorefocusedthanthoseinducedbysolublenativehiv1envelopetrimersinnonhumanprimates
AT rogierwsanders antibodyresponsesinducedbyshivinfectionaremorefocusedthanthoseinducedbysolublenativehiv1envelopetrimersinnonhumanprimates
AT shanecrotty antibodyresponsesinducedbyshivinfectionaremorefocusedthanthoseinducedbysolublenativehiv1envelopetrimersinnonhumanprimates
AT georgemshaw antibodyresponsesinducedbyshivinfectionaremorefocusedthanthoseinducedbysolublenativehiv1envelopetrimersinnonhumanprimates
AT maritjvangils antibodyresponsesinducedbyshivinfectionaremorefocusedthanthoseinducedbysolublenativehiv1envelopetrimersinnonhumanprimates
_version_ 1718375706448101376