Heterogeneous effect of “Belt and Road” on the two-stage eco-efficiency in China's provinces

This paper divides the industrial eco-economic system into manufacturing stage and environmental protection stage, uses the improved metabolic GM(1,1) model and TOPSIS-DEA cross-efficiency model to evaluate the two-stage eco-efficiency of China’s provinces from 2005 to 2020. On this basis, regressio...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fanlin Meng, Wenping Wang
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/175ccddcf72f4ada8305a536e84735ff
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:175ccddcf72f4ada8305a536e84735ff
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:175ccddcf72f4ada8305a536e84735ff2021-12-01T04:55:49ZHeterogeneous effect of “Belt and Road” on the two-stage eco-efficiency in China's provinces1470-160X10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107920https://doaj.org/article/175ccddcf72f4ada8305a536e84735ff2021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X21005859https://doaj.org/toc/1470-160XThis paper divides the industrial eco-economic system into manufacturing stage and environmental protection stage, uses the improved metabolic GM(1,1) model and TOPSIS-DEA cross-efficiency model to evaluate the two-stage eco-efficiency of China’s provinces from 2005 to 2020. On this basis, regression discontinuity is utilized to analyze the heterogeneous impact of “Belt and Road” initiative (BRI) on the eco-efficiency of industrial eco-economic system and two stages. The results show that: the eco-efficiency of industrial eco-economic system (EIES) and the eco-efficiency of manufacturing stage (EMS) have been at a relatively high level, while the eco-efficiency of environmental protection stage (EEPS) is still at a low level so far. The EIES and EMS of the provinces in eastern region are higher than those of the central, western and northeastern regions, while the EEPS of the western region is higher than that of the other three regions. The impacts of BRI on EIES and EEPS are significantly positive, while the BRI has a negative effect on EMS. In addition, there is a significant positive relationship between economic development level and EIES, EMS, and EEPS, industrial structure can promote EIES and EMS, and technological innovation has a significant positive correlation with EMS, a significant negative correlation with EEPS.Fanlin MengWenping WangElsevierarticleBelt and roadImproved metabolic GM(1,1)TOPSIS-DEA cross-efficiency modelEco-EfficiencyRegression discontinuity modelEcologyQH540-549.5ENEcological Indicators, Vol 129, Iss , Pp 107920- (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Belt and road
Improved metabolic GM(1,1)
TOPSIS-DEA cross-efficiency model
Eco-Efficiency
Regression discontinuity model
Ecology
QH540-549.5
spellingShingle Belt and road
Improved metabolic GM(1,1)
TOPSIS-DEA cross-efficiency model
Eco-Efficiency
Regression discontinuity model
Ecology
QH540-549.5
Fanlin Meng
Wenping Wang
Heterogeneous effect of “Belt and Road” on the two-stage eco-efficiency in China's provinces
description This paper divides the industrial eco-economic system into manufacturing stage and environmental protection stage, uses the improved metabolic GM(1,1) model and TOPSIS-DEA cross-efficiency model to evaluate the two-stage eco-efficiency of China’s provinces from 2005 to 2020. On this basis, regression discontinuity is utilized to analyze the heterogeneous impact of “Belt and Road” initiative (BRI) on the eco-efficiency of industrial eco-economic system and two stages. The results show that: the eco-efficiency of industrial eco-economic system (EIES) and the eco-efficiency of manufacturing stage (EMS) have been at a relatively high level, while the eco-efficiency of environmental protection stage (EEPS) is still at a low level so far. The EIES and EMS of the provinces in eastern region are higher than those of the central, western and northeastern regions, while the EEPS of the western region is higher than that of the other three regions. The impacts of BRI on EIES and EEPS are significantly positive, while the BRI has a negative effect on EMS. In addition, there is a significant positive relationship between economic development level and EIES, EMS, and EEPS, industrial structure can promote EIES and EMS, and technological innovation has a significant positive correlation with EMS, a significant negative correlation with EEPS.
format article
author Fanlin Meng
Wenping Wang
author_facet Fanlin Meng
Wenping Wang
author_sort Fanlin Meng
title Heterogeneous effect of “Belt and Road” on the two-stage eco-efficiency in China's provinces
title_short Heterogeneous effect of “Belt and Road” on the two-stage eco-efficiency in China's provinces
title_full Heterogeneous effect of “Belt and Road” on the two-stage eco-efficiency in China's provinces
title_fullStr Heterogeneous effect of “Belt and Road” on the two-stage eco-efficiency in China's provinces
title_full_unstemmed Heterogeneous effect of “Belt and Road” on the two-stage eco-efficiency in China's provinces
title_sort heterogeneous effect of “belt and road” on the two-stage eco-efficiency in china's provinces
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/175ccddcf72f4ada8305a536e84735ff
work_keys_str_mv AT fanlinmeng heterogeneouseffectofbeltandroadonthetwostageecoefficiencyinchinasprovinces
AT wenpingwang heterogeneouseffectofbeltandroadonthetwostageecoefficiencyinchinasprovinces
_version_ 1718405647181021184