The Bright and Dark Sides of Resources for Cross-Role Interrupting Behaviors and Work–Family Conflict: Preliminary Multigroup Findings on Remote and Traditional Working
Using boundary management and conservation of resources theories, we examined how job resources (i.e., job autonomy and goal-oriented leadership) and a work-related personal resource (i.e., personal initiative at work) relate to cross-role interrupting behaviors—i.e., interrupting the work (or non-w...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
MDPI AG
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/17c6498fd1ea4f40b91de883f4a624a2 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:17c6498fd1ea4f40b91de883f4a624a2 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:17c6498fd1ea4f40b91de883f4a624a22021-11-25T17:51:59ZThe Bright and Dark Sides of Resources for Cross-Role Interrupting Behaviors and Work–Family Conflict: Preliminary Multigroup Findings on Remote and Traditional Working10.3390/ijerph1822122071660-46011661-7827https://doaj.org/article/17c6498fd1ea4f40b91de883f4a624a22021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/22/12207https://doaj.org/toc/1661-7827https://doaj.org/toc/1660-4601Using boundary management and conservation of resources theories, we examined how job resources (i.e., job autonomy and goal-oriented leadership) and a work-related personal resource (i.e., personal initiative at work) relate to cross-role interrupting behaviors—i.e., interrupting the work (or non-work) role to attend to competing non-work (or work) demands—and how, in turn, they correlate with work–family conflict. Furthermore, we examined differences in the proposed nomological network between workers adopting traditional and remote ways of working. Using a multigroup structural equation modelling approach on a sample of 968 employees from an Italian telecommunications company, we found that: (a) job autonomy was positively related to both work interrupting non-work behaviors and to non-work interrupting work behaviors, (b) goal-oriented leadership was negatively related to non-work interrupting work behaviors, (c) personal initiative at work was positively related to work interrupting non-work behaviors and, finally, (d) cross-role interrupting behaviors were positively related to work–family conflict. Additionally, our findings revealed previously undocumented results; (a) mediating patterns in how resources relate, through cross-role interrupting behaviors, to work–family conflict and (b) non-invariant associations among job autonomy, cross-role interrupting behaviors and work–family conflict across traditional and remote workers. The limitations and theoretical and practical implications of the present study are discussed.Ferdinando Paolo SantarpiaLaura BorgogniChiara ConsiglioPietro MenattaMDPI AGarticleinterruptionsboundary managementresourcesremote workingwork–family conflictmultigroupMedicineRENInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol 18, Iss 12207, p 12207 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
interruptions boundary management resources remote working work–family conflict multigroup Medicine R |
spellingShingle |
interruptions boundary management resources remote working work–family conflict multigroup Medicine R Ferdinando Paolo Santarpia Laura Borgogni Chiara Consiglio Pietro Menatta The Bright and Dark Sides of Resources for Cross-Role Interrupting Behaviors and Work–Family Conflict: Preliminary Multigroup Findings on Remote and Traditional Working |
description |
Using boundary management and conservation of resources theories, we examined how job resources (i.e., job autonomy and goal-oriented leadership) and a work-related personal resource (i.e., personal initiative at work) relate to cross-role interrupting behaviors—i.e., interrupting the work (or non-work) role to attend to competing non-work (or work) demands—and how, in turn, they correlate with work–family conflict. Furthermore, we examined differences in the proposed nomological network between workers adopting traditional and remote ways of working. Using a multigroup structural equation modelling approach on a sample of 968 employees from an Italian telecommunications company, we found that: (a) job autonomy was positively related to both work interrupting non-work behaviors and to non-work interrupting work behaviors, (b) goal-oriented leadership was negatively related to non-work interrupting work behaviors, (c) personal initiative at work was positively related to work interrupting non-work behaviors and, finally, (d) cross-role interrupting behaviors were positively related to work–family conflict. Additionally, our findings revealed previously undocumented results; (a) mediating patterns in how resources relate, through cross-role interrupting behaviors, to work–family conflict and (b) non-invariant associations among job autonomy, cross-role interrupting behaviors and work–family conflict across traditional and remote workers. The limitations and theoretical and practical implications of the present study are discussed. |
format |
article |
author |
Ferdinando Paolo Santarpia Laura Borgogni Chiara Consiglio Pietro Menatta |
author_facet |
Ferdinando Paolo Santarpia Laura Borgogni Chiara Consiglio Pietro Menatta |
author_sort |
Ferdinando Paolo Santarpia |
title |
The Bright and Dark Sides of Resources for Cross-Role Interrupting Behaviors and Work–Family Conflict: Preliminary Multigroup Findings on Remote and Traditional Working |
title_short |
The Bright and Dark Sides of Resources for Cross-Role Interrupting Behaviors and Work–Family Conflict: Preliminary Multigroup Findings on Remote and Traditional Working |
title_full |
The Bright and Dark Sides of Resources for Cross-Role Interrupting Behaviors and Work–Family Conflict: Preliminary Multigroup Findings on Remote and Traditional Working |
title_fullStr |
The Bright and Dark Sides of Resources for Cross-Role Interrupting Behaviors and Work–Family Conflict: Preliminary Multigroup Findings on Remote and Traditional Working |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Bright and Dark Sides of Resources for Cross-Role Interrupting Behaviors and Work–Family Conflict: Preliminary Multigroup Findings on Remote and Traditional Working |
title_sort |
bright and dark sides of resources for cross-role interrupting behaviors and work–family conflict: preliminary multigroup findings on remote and traditional working |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/17c6498fd1ea4f40b91de883f4a624a2 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ferdinandopaolosantarpia thebrightanddarksidesofresourcesforcrossroleinterruptingbehaviorsandworkfamilyconflictpreliminarymultigroupfindingsonremoteandtraditionalworking AT lauraborgogni thebrightanddarksidesofresourcesforcrossroleinterruptingbehaviorsandworkfamilyconflictpreliminarymultigroupfindingsonremoteandtraditionalworking AT chiaraconsiglio thebrightanddarksidesofresourcesforcrossroleinterruptingbehaviorsandworkfamilyconflictpreliminarymultigroupfindingsonremoteandtraditionalworking AT pietromenatta thebrightanddarksidesofresourcesforcrossroleinterruptingbehaviorsandworkfamilyconflictpreliminarymultigroupfindingsonremoteandtraditionalworking AT ferdinandopaolosantarpia brightanddarksidesofresourcesforcrossroleinterruptingbehaviorsandworkfamilyconflictpreliminarymultigroupfindingsonremoteandtraditionalworking AT lauraborgogni brightanddarksidesofresourcesforcrossroleinterruptingbehaviorsandworkfamilyconflictpreliminarymultigroupfindingsonremoteandtraditionalworking AT chiaraconsiglio brightanddarksidesofresourcesforcrossroleinterruptingbehaviorsandworkfamilyconflictpreliminarymultigroupfindingsonremoteandtraditionalworking AT pietromenatta brightanddarksidesofresourcesforcrossroleinterruptingbehaviorsandworkfamilyconflictpreliminarymultigroupfindingsonremoteandtraditionalworking |
_version_ |
1718411906984706048 |