Triple-Endobutton and clavicular hook: A propensity score matching analysis

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 635 patients with acute acromioclavicular dislocation, who underwent surgery in our hospital between May 2014 and June 2020. Patients were divided into group A (clavicular hook plate) and group B (Triple-Endobutton plates via double-incision). The pro...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Zhang Sujie, Zhang Haojie, Wang Jiabo, Ma Xuehai, Gu Shaohua
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	De Gruyter 2021
Materias:	acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation triple-endobutton plates clavicular hook plate propensity score matching minimally invasive double-incision Medicine R
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/1832aa55a7c4423b88cae444fefeb2a9
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:1832aa55a7c4423b88cae444fefeb2a9
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:1832aa55a7c4423b88cae444fefeb2a92021-12-05T14:10:55ZTriple-Endobutton and clavicular hook: A propensity score matching analysis2391-546310.1515/med-2021-0339https://doaj.org/article/1832aa55a7c4423b88cae444fefeb2a92021-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1515/med-2021-0339https://doaj.org/toc/2391-5463We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 635 patients with acute acromioclavicular dislocation, who underwent surgery in our hospital between May 2014 and June 2020. Patients were divided into group A (clavicular hook plate) and group B (Triple-Endobutton plates via double-incision). The propensity score analysis using one to one match was performed for comparisons. We obtained 292 matched patients’ data. The matched preoperative clinical characteristics were a balance between the two groups. All clinical parameters showed insignificant differences (P > 0.05). Compared with group A, group B has longer operative time (P < 0.001) and more blood loss (P < 0.001); however, the mean incision length (P < 0.001) and length of hospitalization (P < 0.001) were shorter in group B than in the group A. The mean VAS in group B were significantly lower than in group A at each time point (P < 0.001), and the UCLA shoulder score was higher in the group B. The CMS scores were also higher in group B than in group A, including before removal and 12 weeks after removal (P < 0.001). The clinical efficacy of the double-incision Triple-Endobutton plate is better than the clavicular hook plate technology, and achieves anatomical reduction by reconstructing coracoclavicular ligament.Zhang SujieZhang HaojieWang JiaboMa XuehaiGu ShaohuaDe Gruyterarticleacute acromioclavicular joint dislocationtriple-endobutton platesclavicular hook platepropensity score matchingminimally invasive double-incisionMedicineRENOpen Medicine, Vol 16, Iss 1, Pp 1328-1335 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation triple-endobutton plates clavicular hook plate propensity score matching minimally invasive double-incision Medicine R
spellingShingle	acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation triple-endobutton plates clavicular hook plate propensity score matching minimally invasive double-incision Medicine R Zhang Sujie Zhang Haojie Wang Jiabo Ma Xuehai Gu Shaohua Triple-Endobutton and clavicular hook: A propensity score matching analysis
description	We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 635 patients with acute acromioclavicular dislocation, who underwent surgery in our hospital between May 2014 and June 2020. Patients were divided into group A (clavicular hook plate) and group B (Triple-Endobutton plates via double-incision). The propensity score analysis using one to one match was performed for comparisons. We obtained 292 matched patients’ data. The matched preoperative clinical characteristics were a balance between the two groups. All clinical parameters showed insignificant differences (P > 0.05). Compared with group A, group B has longer operative time (P < 0.001) and more blood loss (P < 0.001); however, the mean incision length (P < 0.001) and length of hospitalization (P < 0.001) were shorter in group B than in the group A. The mean VAS in group B were significantly lower than in group A at each time point (P < 0.001), and the UCLA shoulder score was higher in the group B. The CMS scores were also higher in group B than in group A, including before removal and 12 weeks after removal (P < 0.001). The clinical efficacy of the double-incision Triple-Endobutton plate is better than the clavicular hook plate technology, and achieves anatomical reduction by reconstructing coracoclavicular ligament.
format	article
author	Zhang Sujie Zhang Haojie Wang Jiabo Ma Xuehai Gu Shaohua
author_facet	Zhang Sujie Zhang Haojie Wang Jiabo Ma Xuehai Gu Shaohua
author_sort	Zhang Sujie
title	Triple-Endobutton and clavicular hook: A propensity score matching analysis
title_short	Triple-Endobutton and clavicular hook: A propensity score matching analysis
title_full	Triple-Endobutton and clavicular hook: A propensity score matching analysis
title_fullStr	Triple-Endobutton and clavicular hook: A propensity score matching analysis
title_full_unstemmed	Triple-Endobutton and clavicular hook: A propensity score matching analysis
title_sort	triple-endobutton and clavicular hook: a propensity score matching analysis
publisher	De Gruyter
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/1832aa55a7c4423b88cae444fefeb2a9
work_keys_str_mv	AT zhangsujie tripleendobuttonandclavicularhookapropensityscorematchinganalysis AT zhanghaojie tripleendobuttonandclavicularhookapropensityscorematchinganalysis AT wangjiabo tripleendobuttonandclavicularhookapropensityscorematchinganalysis AT maxuehai tripleendobuttonandclavicularhookapropensityscorematchinganalysis AT gushaohua tripleendobuttonandclavicularhookapropensityscorematchinganalysis
_version_	1718371586419982336

Triple-Endobutton and clavicular hook: A propensity score matching analysis

Ejemplares similares