A Comparison of the Probes with a Cantilever Beam and a Double-Sided Beam in the Tool Edge Profiler for On-Machine Measurement of a Precision Cutting Tool

This paper describes a comparison of the mechanical structures (a double-sided beam and a cantilever beam) of a probe in a tool edge profiler for the measurement of a micro-cutting tool. The tool edge profiler consists of a positioning unit having a pair of one-axis DC servo motor stages and a probe...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bo Wen, Sho Sekine, Shinichi Osawa, Yuki Shimizu, Hiraku Matsukuma, Andreas Archenti, Wei Gao
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/183519c1f598462e96fd467e463d0768
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:183519c1f598462e96fd467e463d0768
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:183519c1f598462e96fd467e463d07682021-11-25T18:12:11ZA Comparison of the Probes with a Cantilever Beam and a Double-Sided Beam in the Tool Edge Profiler for On-Machine Measurement of a Precision Cutting Tool10.3390/machines91102712075-1702https://doaj.org/article/183519c1f598462e96fd467e463d07682021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2075-1702/9/11/271https://doaj.org/toc/2075-1702This paper describes a comparison of the mechanical structures (a double-sided beam and a cantilever beam) of a probe in a tool edge profiler for the measurement of a micro-cutting tool. The tool edge profiler consists of a positioning unit having a pair of one-axis DC servo motor stages and a probe unit having a laser displacement sensor and a probe composed of a stylus and a mechanical beam; on-machine measurement of a tool cutting edge can be conducted with a low contact force through measuring the deformation of the probe by the laser displacement sensor while monitoring the tool position. Meanwhile, the mechanical structure of the probe could affect the performance of measurement of the edge profile of a precision cutting tool. In this paper, the measurement principle of the tool edge profile is firstly introduced; after that, slopes and a top-flat of a cutting tool sample are measured by using a cantilever-type probe and a double-sided beam-type probe, respectively. The measurement performances of the two probes are compared through experiments and theoretical measurement uncertainty analysis.Bo WenSho SekineShinichi OsawaYuki ShimizuHiraku MatsukumaAndreas ArchentiWei GaoMDPI AGarticleon-machine measurementcantilever beamdouble-sided beamtool edge profilermicro cutting edgelow-force measurementMechanical engineering and machineryTJ1-1570ENMachines, Vol 9, Iss 271, p 271 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic on-machine measurement
cantilever beam
double-sided beam
tool edge profiler
micro cutting edge
low-force measurement
Mechanical engineering and machinery
TJ1-1570
spellingShingle on-machine measurement
cantilever beam
double-sided beam
tool edge profiler
micro cutting edge
low-force measurement
Mechanical engineering and machinery
TJ1-1570
Bo Wen
Sho Sekine
Shinichi Osawa
Yuki Shimizu
Hiraku Matsukuma
Andreas Archenti
Wei Gao
A Comparison of the Probes with a Cantilever Beam and a Double-Sided Beam in the Tool Edge Profiler for On-Machine Measurement of a Precision Cutting Tool
description This paper describes a comparison of the mechanical structures (a double-sided beam and a cantilever beam) of a probe in a tool edge profiler for the measurement of a micro-cutting tool. The tool edge profiler consists of a positioning unit having a pair of one-axis DC servo motor stages and a probe unit having a laser displacement sensor and a probe composed of a stylus and a mechanical beam; on-machine measurement of a tool cutting edge can be conducted with a low contact force through measuring the deformation of the probe by the laser displacement sensor while monitoring the tool position. Meanwhile, the mechanical structure of the probe could affect the performance of measurement of the edge profile of a precision cutting tool. In this paper, the measurement principle of the tool edge profile is firstly introduced; after that, slopes and a top-flat of a cutting tool sample are measured by using a cantilever-type probe and a double-sided beam-type probe, respectively. The measurement performances of the two probes are compared through experiments and theoretical measurement uncertainty analysis.
format article
author Bo Wen
Sho Sekine
Shinichi Osawa
Yuki Shimizu
Hiraku Matsukuma
Andreas Archenti
Wei Gao
author_facet Bo Wen
Sho Sekine
Shinichi Osawa
Yuki Shimizu
Hiraku Matsukuma
Andreas Archenti
Wei Gao
author_sort Bo Wen
title A Comparison of the Probes with a Cantilever Beam and a Double-Sided Beam in the Tool Edge Profiler for On-Machine Measurement of a Precision Cutting Tool
title_short A Comparison of the Probes with a Cantilever Beam and a Double-Sided Beam in the Tool Edge Profiler for On-Machine Measurement of a Precision Cutting Tool
title_full A Comparison of the Probes with a Cantilever Beam and a Double-Sided Beam in the Tool Edge Profiler for On-Machine Measurement of a Precision Cutting Tool
title_fullStr A Comparison of the Probes with a Cantilever Beam and a Double-Sided Beam in the Tool Edge Profiler for On-Machine Measurement of a Precision Cutting Tool
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of the Probes with a Cantilever Beam and a Double-Sided Beam in the Tool Edge Profiler for On-Machine Measurement of a Precision Cutting Tool
title_sort comparison of the probes with a cantilever beam and a double-sided beam in the tool edge profiler for on-machine measurement of a precision cutting tool
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/183519c1f598462e96fd467e463d0768
work_keys_str_mv AT bowen acomparisonoftheprobeswithacantileverbeamandadoublesidedbeaminthetooledgeprofilerforonmachinemeasurementofaprecisioncuttingtool
AT shosekine acomparisonoftheprobeswithacantileverbeamandadoublesidedbeaminthetooledgeprofilerforonmachinemeasurementofaprecisioncuttingtool
AT shinichiosawa acomparisonoftheprobeswithacantileverbeamandadoublesidedbeaminthetooledgeprofilerforonmachinemeasurementofaprecisioncuttingtool
AT yukishimizu acomparisonoftheprobeswithacantileverbeamandadoublesidedbeaminthetooledgeprofilerforonmachinemeasurementofaprecisioncuttingtool
AT hirakumatsukuma acomparisonoftheprobeswithacantileverbeamandadoublesidedbeaminthetooledgeprofilerforonmachinemeasurementofaprecisioncuttingtool
AT andreasarchenti acomparisonoftheprobeswithacantileverbeamandadoublesidedbeaminthetooledgeprofilerforonmachinemeasurementofaprecisioncuttingtool
AT weigao acomparisonoftheprobeswithacantileverbeamandadoublesidedbeaminthetooledgeprofilerforonmachinemeasurementofaprecisioncuttingtool
AT bowen comparisonoftheprobeswithacantileverbeamandadoublesidedbeaminthetooledgeprofilerforonmachinemeasurementofaprecisioncuttingtool
AT shosekine comparisonoftheprobeswithacantileverbeamandadoublesidedbeaminthetooledgeprofilerforonmachinemeasurementofaprecisioncuttingtool
AT shinichiosawa comparisonoftheprobeswithacantileverbeamandadoublesidedbeaminthetooledgeprofilerforonmachinemeasurementofaprecisioncuttingtool
AT yukishimizu comparisonoftheprobeswithacantileverbeamandadoublesidedbeaminthetooledgeprofilerforonmachinemeasurementofaprecisioncuttingtool
AT hirakumatsukuma comparisonoftheprobeswithacantileverbeamandadoublesidedbeaminthetooledgeprofilerforonmachinemeasurementofaprecisioncuttingtool
AT andreasarchenti comparisonoftheprobeswithacantileverbeamandadoublesidedbeaminthetooledgeprofilerforonmachinemeasurementofaprecisioncuttingtool
AT weigao comparisonoftheprobeswithacantileverbeamandadoublesidedbeaminthetooledgeprofilerforonmachinemeasurementofaprecisioncuttingtool
_version_ 1718411483596980224