Minimally invasive surgery versus transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has recently been approved for use in patients who are at intermediate and low surgical risk. Moreover, recent years have witnessed a renewed interest in minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (miAVR). The present meta-analysis compared the outcomes...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | Ahmed Bendary, Ahmed Ramzy, Ahmed Sayed, Salma Almotawally, Karim Wilson, Malak Munir, Sameer Hirji, Abdelrahman Ibrahim Abushouk |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/183ac04a9ba045e6a1cc26fea7d63e5a |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
The role of far-field intravascular ultrasound in transcatheter aortic valve replacement
por: Ahmed Hassanin, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Evaluation and Management of Heart Block After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
por: Anthony J Mazzella, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Correction: Minimally invasive surgery versus transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Publicado: (2021) -
Conduction Abnormalities After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
por: Somsupha Kanjanauthai, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Shockwave and Non-transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
por: Eden C Payabyab, et al.
Publicado: (2021)