A Simplified Risk-Ranking System for Prioritizing Toxic Pollution Sites in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

Background: In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), chemical exposures in the environment due to <a title="Learn more about Hazardous Waste" href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/hazardous-waste">hazardous waste</a> sites and toxic pol...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jack Caravanos, Sandra Gualtero, Russell Dowling, Bret Ericson, John Keith, David Hanrahan, Richard Fuller
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Ubiquity Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/185e910992364bb0ba43c6e8d35a3b8d
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:185e910992364bb0ba43c6e8d35a3b8d
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:185e910992364bb0ba43c6e8d35a3b8d2021-12-02T08:52:06ZA Simplified Risk-Ranking System for Prioritizing Toxic Pollution Sites in Low- and Middle-Income Countries2214-999610.1016/j.aogh.2014.09.001https://doaj.org/article/185e910992364bb0ba43c6e8d35a3b8d2014-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://annalsofglobalhealth.org/articles/2058https://doaj.org/toc/2214-9996Background: In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), chemical exposures in the environment due to <a title="Learn more about Hazardous Waste" href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/hazardous-waste">hazardous waste</a> sites and toxic pollutants are typically poorly documented and their health impacts insufficiently quantified. Furthermore, there often is only limited understanding of the health and environmental consequences of point source pollution problems, and little consensus on how to assess and rank them. The contributions of toxic environmental exposures to the global burden of disease are not well characterized. Objectives: The aim of this study was to describe the simple but effective approach taken by Blacksmith Institute’s Toxic Sites Identification Program to quantify and rank toxic exposures in LMICs. This system is already in use at more than 3000 sites in 48 countries such as India, Indonesia, China, Ghana, Kenya, Tanzania, Peru, Bolivia, Argentina, Uruguay, Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Ukraine. Methods: A hazard ranking system formula, the Blacksmith Index (BI), takes into account important factors such as the scale of the pollution source, the size of the population possibly affected, and the exposure pathways, and is designed for use reliably in low-resource settings by local personnel provided with limited training. Findings: Four representative case studies are presented, with varying locations, populations, pollutants, and exposure pathways. The BI was successfully applied to assess the extent and severity of environmental pollution problems at these sites. Conclusions: The BI is a risk-ranking tool that provides direct and straightforward characterization, quantification, and prioritization of toxic pollution sites in settings where time, money, or resources are limited. It will be an important and useful tool for addressing toxic pollution problems in LMICs. Although the BI does not have the sophistication of the US Environmental Protection Agency’s Hazard Ranking System, the case studies presented here document the effectiveness of the BI in the field, especially in low-resource settings. Understanding of the risks posed by toxic pollution sites helps assure better use of resources to manage sites and mitigate risks to public health. Quantification of these hazards is an important input to assessments of the global burden of disease.Jack CaravanosSandra GualteroRussell DowlingBret EricsonJohn KeithDavid HanrahanRichard FullerUbiquity Pressarticlechildren’s healthenvironmental healthglobal burden of diseaseglobal healthhazard ranking systemhazardous waste siteslegacy pollutionlow- and middle-income countriesrisk assessmenttoxic pollutionInfectious and parasitic diseasesRC109-216Public aspects of medicineRA1-1270ENAnnals of Global Health, Vol 80, Iss 4, Pp 278-285 (2014)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic children’s health
environmental health
global burden of disease
global health
hazard ranking system
hazardous waste sites
legacy pollution
low- and middle-income countries
risk assessment
toxic pollution
Infectious and parasitic diseases
RC109-216
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
spellingShingle children’s health
environmental health
global burden of disease
global health
hazard ranking system
hazardous waste sites
legacy pollution
low- and middle-income countries
risk assessment
toxic pollution
Infectious and parasitic diseases
RC109-216
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
Jack Caravanos
Sandra Gualtero
Russell Dowling
Bret Ericson
John Keith
David Hanrahan
Richard Fuller
A Simplified Risk-Ranking System for Prioritizing Toxic Pollution Sites in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
description Background: In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), chemical exposures in the environment due to <a title="Learn more about Hazardous Waste" href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/hazardous-waste">hazardous waste</a> sites and toxic pollutants are typically poorly documented and their health impacts insufficiently quantified. Furthermore, there often is only limited understanding of the health and environmental consequences of point source pollution problems, and little consensus on how to assess and rank them. The contributions of toxic environmental exposures to the global burden of disease are not well characterized. Objectives: The aim of this study was to describe the simple but effective approach taken by Blacksmith Institute’s Toxic Sites Identification Program to quantify and rank toxic exposures in LMICs. This system is already in use at more than 3000 sites in 48 countries such as India, Indonesia, China, Ghana, Kenya, Tanzania, Peru, Bolivia, Argentina, Uruguay, Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Ukraine. Methods: A hazard ranking system formula, the Blacksmith Index (BI), takes into account important factors such as the scale of the pollution source, the size of the population possibly affected, and the exposure pathways, and is designed for use reliably in low-resource settings by local personnel provided with limited training. Findings: Four representative case studies are presented, with varying locations, populations, pollutants, and exposure pathways. The BI was successfully applied to assess the extent and severity of environmental pollution problems at these sites. Conclusions: The BI is a risk-ranking tool that provides direct and straightforward characterization, quantification, and prioritization of toxic pollution sites in settings where time, money, or resources are limited. It will be an important and useful tool for addressing toxic pollution problems in LMICs. Although the BI does not have the sophistication of the US Environmental Protection Agency’s Hazard Ranking System, the case studies presented here document the effectiveness of the BI in the field, especially in low-resource settings. Understanding of the risks posed by toxic pollution sites helps assure better use of resources to manage sites and mitigate risks to public health. Quantification of these hazards is an important input to assessments of the global burden of disease.
format article
author Jack Caravanos
Sandra Gualtero
Russell Dowling
Bret Ericson
John Keith
David Hanrahan
Richard Fuller
author_facet Jack Caravanos
Sandra Gualtero
Russell Dowling
Bret Ericson
John Keith
David Hanrahan
Richard Fuller
author_sort Jack Caravanos
title A Simplified Risk-Ranking System for Prioritizing Toxic Pollution Sites in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
title_short A Simplified Risk-Ranking System for Prioritizing Toxic Pollution Sites in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
title_full A Simplified Risk-Ranking System for Prioritizing Toxic Pollution Sites in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
title_fullStr A Simplified Risk-Ranking System for Prioritizing Toxic Pollution Sites in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
title_full_unstemmed A Simplified Risk-Ranking System for Prioritizing Toxic Pollution Sites in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
title_sort simplified risk-ranking system for prioritizing toxic pollution sites in low- and middle-income countries
publisher Ubiquity Press
publishDate 2014
url https://doaj.org/article/185e910992364bb0ba43c6e8d35a3b8d
work_keys_str_mv AT jackcaravanos asimplifiedriskrankingsystemforprioritizingtoxicpollutionsitesinlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT sandragualtero asimplifiedriskrankingsystemforprioritizingtoxicpollutionsitesinlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT russelldowling asimplifiedriskrankingsystemforprioritizingtoxicpollutionsitesinlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT bretericson asimplifiedriskrankingsystemforprioritizingtoxicpollutionsitesinlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT johnkeith asimplifiedriskrankingsystemforprioritizingtoxicpollutionsitesinlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT davidhanrahan asimplifiedriskrankingsystemforprioritizingtoxicpollutionsitesinlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT richardfuller asimplifiedriskrankingsystemforprioritizingtoxicpollutionsitesinlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT jackcaravanos simplifiedriskrankingsystemforprioritizingtoxicpollutionsitesinlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT sandragualtero simplifiedriskrankingsystemforprioritizingtoxicpollutionsitesinlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT russelldowling simplifiedriskrankingsystemforprioritizingtoxicpollutionsitesinlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT bretericson simplifiedriskrankingsystemforprioritizingtoxicpollutionsitesinlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT johnkeith simplifiedriskrankingsystemforprioritizingtoxicpollutionsitesinlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT davidhanrahan simplifiedriskrankingsystemforprioritizingtoxicpollutionsitesinlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT richardfuller simplifiedriskrankingsystemforprioritizingtoxicpollutionsitesinlowandmiddleincomecountries
_version_ 1718398349230473216