Does Delivery Model Matter? The Influence of Course Delivery Model on Teacher Candidates’ Self-Efficacy Beliefs Towards Inclusive Practices

A causal-comparative research design was used to examine the influence of course delivery (face-to-face flipped or asynchronous online) on participants’ self-efficacy beliefs toward teaching in an inclusive classroom. The following research questions were used to guide the study: (a) Is there a rel...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moriah Smothers, Tori Colson, Stacey Keown
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Athabasca University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/186f649531ca46be96d2331fdd567127
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:186f649531ca46be96d2331fdd567127
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:186f649531ca46be96d2331fdd5671272021-12-02T18:02:59ZDoes Delivery Model Matter? The Influence of Course Delivery Model on Teacher Candidates’ Self-Efficacy Beliefs Towards Inclusive Practices10.19173/irrodl.v21i3.46751492-3831https://doaj.org/article/186f649531ca46be96d2331fdd5671272020-03-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/4675https://doaj.org/toc/1492-3831 A causal-comparative research design was used to examine the influence of course delivery (face-to-face flipped or asynchronous online) on participants’ self-efficacy beliefs toward teaching in an inclusive classroom. The following research questions were used to guide the study: (a) Is there a relationship between completing an introduction of exceptionalities course and participants’ self-efficacy toward teaching an inclusive classroom? (b) Is there a relationship between completing an introduction of exceptionalities course in an asynchronous online or face-to-face flipped format on participants’ self-efficacy beliefs toward teaching in an inclusive classroom? The purpose of this study was to explore if there is a relationship between self-efficacy belief development and course delivery models. The results indicated a significant difference in self-efficacy beliefs towards teaching in an inclusive classroom after completing an introduction of exceptionalities course. However, there was no significant difference in the participants’ efficacy based on the course delivery model (face-to-face flipped or asynchronous online). Implications and suggestions for future research are discussed. Moriah SmothersTori ColsonStacey KeownAthabasca University Pressarticledistance educationself-efficacyteacher educationinclusionSpecial aspects of educationLC8-6691ENInternational Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, Vol 21, Iss 3 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic distance education
self-efficacy
teacher education
inclusion
Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
spellingShingle distance education
self-efficacy
teacher education
inclusion
Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
Moriah Smothers
Tori Colson
Stacey Keown
Does Delivery Model Matter? The Influence of Course Delivery Model on Teacher Candidates’ Self-Efficacy Beliefs Towards Inclusive Practices
description A causal-comparative research design was used to examine the influence of course delivery (face-to-face flipped or asynchronous online) on participants’ self-efficacy beliefs toward teaching in an inclusive classroom. The following research questions were used to guide the study: (a) Is there a relationship between completing an introduction of exceptionalities course and participants’ self-efficacy toward teaching an inclusive classroom? (b) Is there a relationship between completing an introduction of exceptionalities course in an asynchronous online or face-to-face flipped format on participants’ self-efficacy beliefs toward teaching in an inclusive classroom? The purpose of this study was to explore if there is a relationship between self-efficacy belief development and course delivery models. The results indicated a significant difference in self-efficacy beliefs towards teaching in an inclusive classroom after completing an introduction of exceptionalities course. However, there was no significant difference in the participants’ efficacy based on the course delivery model (face-to-face flipped or asynchronous online). Implications and suggestions for future research are discussed.
format article
author Moriah Smothers
Tori Colson
Stacey Keown
author_facet Moriah Smothers
Tori Colson
Stacey Keown
author_sort Moriah Smothers
title Does Delivery Model Matter? The Influence of Course Delivery Model on Teacher Candidates’ Self-Efficacy Beliefs Towards Inclusive Practices
title_short Does Delivery Model Matter? The Influence of Course Delivery Model on Teacher Candidates’ Self-Efficacy Beliefs Towards Inclusive Practices
title_full Does Delivery Model Matter? The Influence of Course Delivery Model on Teacher Candidates’ Self-Efficacy Beliefs Towards Inclusive Practices
title_fullStr Does Delivery Model Matter? The Influence of Course Delivery Model on Teacher Candidates’ Self-Efficacy Beliefs Towards Inclusive Practices
title_full_unstemmed Does Delivery Model Matter? The Influence of Course Delivery Model on Teacher Candidates’ Self-Efficacy Beliefs Towards Inclusive Practices
title_sort does delivery model matter? the influence of course delivery model on teacher candidates’ self-efficacy beliefs towards inclusive practices
publisher Athabasca University Press
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/186f649531ca46be96d2331fdd567127
work_keys_str_mv AT moriahsmothers doesdeliverymodelmattertheinfluenceofcoursedeliverymodelonteachercandidatesselfefficacybeliefstowardsinclusivepractices
AT toricolson doesdeliverymodelmattertheinfluenceofcoursedeliverymodelonteachercandidatesselfefficacybeliefstowardsinclusivepractices
AT staceykeown doesdeliverymodelmattertheinfluenceofcoursedeliverymodelonteachercandidatesselfefficacybeliefstowardsinclusivepractices
_version_ 1718378794559995904