Pet-Friendly for Whom? An Analysis of Pet Fees in Texas Rental Housing
Previous studies have underscored the difficulty low-income pet owners often face when attempting to secure affordable rental housing. Further exacerbating this housing disparity are fees charged on top of normal monthly rent to pet owners in “pet-friendly” rental housing. In this study, we aggregat...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN |
| Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/18772cbc327943f789bf4ae04b9eaf46 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| id |
oai:doaj.org-article:18772cbc327943f789bf4ae04b9eaf46 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:18772cbc327943f789bf4ae04b9eaf462021-11-08T05:44:16ZPet-Friendly for Whom? An Analysis of Pet Fees in Texas Rental Housing2297-176910.3389/fvets.2021.767149https://doaj.org/article/18772cbc327943f789bf4ae04b9eaf462021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2021.767149/fullhttps://doaj.org/toc/2297-1769Previous studies have underscored the difficulty low-income pet owners often face when attempting to secure affordable rental housing. Further exacerbating this housing disparity are fees charged on top of normal monthly rent to pet owners in “pet-friendly” rental housing. In this study, we aggregated rental housing listings from the twenty most populous cities in Texas, USA from a popular online rental database. We paired the rental listings with census tract information from the American Community Survey in order to investigate economic and racial/ethnic patterns in the spatial distribution of the properties. We find that less expensive pet-friendly listings were more likely to have pet fees charged on top of rent than rental units that were more expensive. Additionally, when pet fee burden was defined as a function of average income by census tract, low-income communities and communities of color were more likely than higher income and predominantly White communities to pay disproportionately higher fees to keep pets in their homes. We also find patterns of spatial inequalities related to pet fee burden by a metric of income inequality by city. The burden of pet rental fees may contribute to both housing insecurity and companion animal relinquishment. We discuss these findings as they relate to inequalities in housing, with particular attention to marginalized and disadvantaged people with pets. We conclude with recommendations for policy and practice.Jennifer W. ApplebaumKevin HoreckaLauren LoneyTaryn M. GrahamFrontiers Media S.A.articlepet-friendly housinghousing inequalitypet ownershipcompanion animalspetshousingVeterinary medicineSF600-1100ENFrontiers in Veterinary Science, Vol 8 (2021) |
| institution |
DOAJ |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
EN |
| topic |
pet-friendly housing housing inequality pet ownership companion animals pets housing Veterinary medicine SF600-1100 |
| spellingShingle |
pet-friendly housing housing inequality pet ownership companion animals pets housing Veterinary medicine SF600-1100 Jennifer W. Applebaum Kevin Horecka Lauren Loney Taryn M. Graham Pet-Friendly for Whom? An Analysis of Pet Fees in Texas Rental Housing |
| description |
Previous studies have underscored the difficulty low-income pet owners often face when attempting to secure affordable rental housing. Further exacerbating this housing disparity are fees charged on top of normal monthly rent to pet owners in “pet-friendly” rental housing. In this study, we aggregated rental housing listings from the twenty most populous cities in Texas, USA from a popular online rental database. We paired the rental listings with census tract information from the American Community Survey in order to investigate economic and racial/ethnic patterns in the spatial distribution of the properties. We find that less expensive pet-friendly listings were more likely to have pet fees charged on top of rent than rental units that were more expensive. Additionally, when pet fee burden was defined as a function of average income by census tract, low-income communities and communities of color were more likely than higher income and predominantly White communities to pay disproportionately higher fees to keep pets in their homes. We also find patterns of spatial inequalities related to pet fee burden by a metric of income inequality by city. The burden of pet rental fees may contribute to both housing insecurity and companion animal relinquishment. We discuss these findings as they relate to inequalities in housing, with particular attention to marginalized and disadvantaged people with pets. We conclude with recommendations for policy and practice. |
| format |
article |
| author |
Jennifer W. Applebaum Kevin Horecka Lauren Loney Taryn M. Graham |
| author_facet |
Jennifer W. Applebaum Kevin Horecka Lauren Loney Taryn M. Graham |
| author_sort |
Jennifer W. Applebaum |
| title |
Pet-Friendly for Whom? An Analysis of Pet Fees in Texas Rental Housing |
| title_short |
Pet-Friendly for Whom? An Analysis of Pet Fees in Texas Rental Housing |
| title_full |
Pet-Friendly for Whom? An Analysis of Pet Fees in Texas Rental Housing |
| title_fullStr |
Pet-Friendly for Whom? An Analysis of Pet Fees in Texas Rental Housing |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Pet-Friendly for Whom? An Analysis of Pet Fees in Texas Rental Housing |
| title_sort |
pet-friendly for whom? an analysis of pet fees in texas rental housing |
| publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| url |
https://doaj.org/article/18772cbc327943f789bf4ae04b9eaf46 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT jenniferwapplebaum petfriendlyforwhomananalysisofpetfeesintexasrentalhousing AT kevinhorecka petfriendlyforwhomananalysisofpetfeesintexasrentalhousing AT laurenloney petfriendlyforwhomananalysisofpetfeesintexasrentalhousing AT tarynmgraham petfriendlyforwhomananalysisofpetfeesintexasrentalhousing |
| _version_ |
1718442883035430912 |