Patient-reported outcome measures for masticatory function in adults: a systematic review

Abstract Objective The aim of this systematic review was to critically evaluate the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) for masticatory function in adults. Methods Five electronic databases (Medline, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, CINAHL Plus and APA PsycINFO) were searched up to Marc...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Yanpin Fan, Xin Shu, Katherine Chiu Man Leung, Edward Chin Man Lo
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	BMC 2021
Materias:	Mastication Chewing ability Patient reported outcome measures Epidemiology Adult Dentistry RK1-715
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/18ae6c4f84fd448cb29424d69a1ba960
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:18ae6c4f84fd448cb29424d69a1ba960
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:18ae6c4f84fd448cb29424d69a1ba9602021-11-28T12:29:31ZPatient-reported outcome measures for masticatory function in adults: a systematic review10.1186/s12903-021-01949-71472-6831https://doaj.org/article/18ae6c4f84fd448cb29424d69a1ba9602021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01949-7https://doaj.org/toc/1472-6831Abstract Objective The aim of this systematic review was to critically evaluate the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) for masticatory function in adults. Methods Five electronic databases (Medline, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, CINAHL Plus and APA PsycINFO) were searched up to March 2021. Studies reporting development or validation of PROMs for masticatory function on adults were identified. Methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) risk of bias checklist. Psychometric properties of the PROM in each included study were rated against the criteria for good measurement properties based on the COSMIN guideline. Results Twenty-three studies investigating 19 PROMs were included. Methodological qualities of these studies were diverse. Four types of PROMs were identified: questions using food items to assess masticatory function (13 PROMs), questions on chewing problems (3 PROMs), questions using both food items and chewing problems (2 PROMs) and a global question (1 PROM). Only a few of these PROMs, namely chewing function questionnaire-Chinese, Croatian or Albanian, food intake questionnaire-Japanese, new food intake questionnaire-Japanese, screening for masticatory disorders in older adults and perceived difficulty of chewing-Tanzania demonstrated high or moderate level of evidence in several psychometric properties. Conclusions Currently, there is no PROM for masticatory function in adults with high-level evidence for all psychometric properties. There are variations in the psychometric properties among the different reported PROMs. Trial Registration PROSPERO (CRD42020171591).Yanpin FanXin ShuKatherine Chiu Man LeungEdward Chin Man LoBMCarticleMasticationChewing abilityPatient reported outcome measuresEpidemiologyAdultDentistryRK1-715ENBMC Oral Health, Vol 21, Iss 1, Pp 1-17 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Mastication Chewing ability Patient reported outcome measures Epidemiology Adult Dentistry RK1-715
spellingShingle	Mastication Chewing ability Patient reported outcome measures Epidemiology Adult Dentistry RK1-715 Yanpin Fan Xin Shu Katherine Chiu Man Leung Edward Chin Man Lo Patient-reported outcome measures for masticatory function in adults: a systematic review
description	Abstract Objective The aim of this systematic review was to critically evaluate the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) for masticatory function in adults. Methods Five electronic databases (Medline, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, CINAHL Plus and APA PsycINFO) were searched up to March 2021. Studies reporting development or validation of PROMs for masticatory function on adults were identified. Methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) risk of bias checklist. Psychometric properties of the PROM in each included study were rated against the criteria for good measurement properties based on the COSMIN guideline. Results Twenty-three studies investigating 19 PROMs were included. Methodological qualities of these studies were diverse. Four types of PROMs were identified: questions using food items to assess masticatory function (13 PROMs), questions on chewing problems (3 PROMs), questions using both food items and chewing problems (2 PROMs) and a global question (1 PROM). Only a few of these PROMs, namely chewing function questionnaire-Chinese, Croatian or Albanian, food intake questionnaire-Japanese, new food intake questionnaire-Japanese, screening for masticatory disorders in older adults and perceived difficulty of chewing-Tanzania demonstrated high or moderate level of evidence in several psychometric properties. Conclusions Currently, there is no PROM for masticatory function in adults with high-level evidence for all psychometric properties. There are variations in the psychometric properties among the different reported PROMs. Trial Registration PROSPERO (CRD42020171591).
format	article
author	Yanpin Fan Xin Shu Katherine Chiu Man Leung Edward Chin Man Lo
author_facet	Yanpin Fan Xin Shu Katherine Chiu Man Leung Edward Chin Man Lo
author_sort	Yanpin Fan
title	Patient-reported outcome measures for masticatory function in adults: a systematic review
title_short	Patient-reported outcome measures for masticatory function in adults: a systematic review
title_full	Patient-reported outcome measures for masticatory function in adults: a systematic review
title_fullStr	Patient-reported outcome measures for masticatory function in adults: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed	Patient-reported outcome measures for masticatory function in adults: a systematic review
title_sort	patient-reported outcome measures for masticatory function in adults: a systematic review
publisher	BMC
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/18ae6c4f84fd448cb29424d69a1ba960
work_keys_str_mv	AT yanpinfan patientreportedoutcomemeasuresformasticatoryfunctioninadultsasystematicreview AT xinshu patientreportedoutcomemeasuresformasticatoryfunctioninadultsasystematicreview AT katherinechiumanleung patientreportedoutcomemeasuresformasticatoryfunctioninadultsasystematicreview AT edwardchinmanlo patientreportedoutcomemeasuresformasticatoryfunctioninadultsasystematicreview
_version_	1718407937460797440

Patient-reported outcome measures for masticatory function in adults: a systematic review

Ejemplares similares