A comparison of continuous and discrete time modeling of affective processes in terms of predictive accuracy

Abstract Intra-individual processes are thought to continuously unfold across time. For equally spaced time intervals, the discrete-time lag-1 vector autoregressive (VAR(1)) model and the continuous-time Ornstein–Uhlenbeck (OU) model are equivalent. It is expected that by taking into account the une...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tim Loossens, Francis Tuerlinckx, Stijn Verdonck
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/18c52030855f4ce0a6c94c8bbd103da3
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:18c52030855f4ce0a6c94c8bbd103da3
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:18c52030855f4ce0a6c94c8bbd103da32021-12-02T11:39:39ZA comparison of continuous and discrete time modeling of affective processes in terms of predictive accuracy10.1038/s41598-021-85320-42045-2322https://doaj.org/article/18c52030855f4ce0a6c94c8bbd103da32021-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85320-4https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Intra-individual processes are thought to continuously unfold across time. For equally spaced time intervals, the discrete-time lag-1 vector autoregressive (VAR(1)) model and the continuous-time Ornstein–Uhlenbeck (OU) model are equivalent. It is expected that by taking into account the unequal spacings of the time intervals in real data between observations will lead to an advantage for the OU in terms of predictive accuracy. In this paper, this is claim is being investigated by comparing the predictive accuracy of the OU model to that of the VAR(1) model on typical ESM data obtained in the context of affect research. It is shown that the VAR(1) model outperforms the OU model for the majority of the time series, even though time intervals in the data are unequally spaced. Accounting for measurement error does not change the result. Deleting large abrupt changes on short time intervals (that may be caused by externally driven events) does however lead to a significant improvement for the OU model. This suggests that processes in psychology may be continuously evolving, but that there are factors, like external events, which can disrupt the continuous flow.Tim LoossensFrancis TuerlinckxStijn VerdonckNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Tim Loossens
Francis Tuerlinckx
Stijn Verdonck
A comparison of continuous and discrete time modeling of affective processes in terms of predictive accuracy
description Abstract Intra-individual processes are thought to continuously unfold across time. For equally spaced time intervals, the discrete-time lag-1 vector autoregressive (VAR(1)) model and the continuous-time Ornstein–Uhlenbeck (OU) model are equivalent. It is expected that by taking into account the unequal spacings of the time intervals in real data between observations will lead to an advantage for the OU in terms of predictive accuracy. In this paper, this is claim is being investigated by comparing the predictive accuracy of the OU model to that of the VAR(1) model on typical ESM data obtained in the context of affect research. It is shown that the VAR(1) model outperforms the OU model for the majority of the time series, even though time intervals in the data are unequally spaced. Accounting for measurement error does not change the result. Deleting large abrupt changes on short time intervals (that may be caused by externally driven events) does however lead to a significant improvement for the OU model. This suggests that processes in psychology may be continuously evolving, but that there are factors, like external events, which can disrupt the continuous flow.
format article
author Tim Loossens
Francis Tuerlinckx
Stijn Verdonck
author_facet Tim Loossens
Francis Tuerlinckx
Stijn Verdonck
author_sort Tim Loossens
title A comparison of continuous and discrete time modeling of affective processes in terms of predictive accuracy
title_short A comparison of continuous and discrete time modeling of affective processes in terms of predictive accuracy
title_full A comparison of continuous and discrete time modeling of affective processes in terms of predictive accuracy
title_fullStr A comparison of continuous and discrete time modeling of affective processes in terms of predictive accuracy
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of continuous and discrete time modeling of affective processes in terms of predictive accuracy
title_sort comparison of continuous and discrete time modeling of affective processes in terms of predictive accuracy
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/18c52030855f4ce0a6c94c8bbd103da3
work_keys_str_mv AT timloossens acomparisonofcontinuousanddiscretetimemodelingofaffectiveprocessesintermsofpredictiveaccuracy
AT francistuerlinckx acomparisonofcontinuousanddiscretetimemodelingofaffectiveprocessesintermsofpredictiveaccuracy
AT stijnverdonck acomparisonofcontinuousanddiscretetimemodelingofaffectiveprocessesintermsofpredictiveaccuracy
AT timloossens comparisonofcontinuousanddiscretetimemodelingofaffectiveprocessesintermsofpredictiveaccuracy
AT francistuerlinckx comparisonofcontinuousanddiscretetimemodelingofaffectiveprocessesintermsofpredictiveaccuracy
AT stijnverdonck comparisonofcontinuousanddiscretetimemodelingofaffectiveprocessesintermsofpredictiveaccuracy
_version_ 1718395687853359104