Organizational trauma – Types of organizational forgetting in the case of Belgrade theaters

Organizational memory studies (OMS) frame memory in a managerial mode, treating it as a data storage, limiting the scope from wider field of social memory studies. There is a lack of understanding about how the process of institutional forgetting works and how some memories stay a part of oral narr...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Milena Dragićević-Šešić, Milena Stefanović
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN FR SR
Publicado:	University of Belgrade 2017
Materias:	organizational forgetting organizational memory remembering trauma identity Anthropology GN1-890
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/18c8c14c865f497f9b4a922ebb81801f
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:18c8c14c865f497f9b4a922ebb81801f
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:18c8c14c865f497f9b4a922ebb81801f2021-12-02T01:49:30ZOrganizational trauma – Types of organizational forgetting in the case of Belgrade theaters10.21301/eap.v12i2.130353-15892334-8801https://doaj.org/article/18c8c14c865f497f9b4a922ebb81801f2017-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.eap-iea.org/novi-ojs/index.php/eap/article/view/766https://doaj.org/toc/0353-1589https://doaj.org/toc/2334-8801 Organizational memory studies (OMS) frame memory in a managerial mode, treating it as a data storage, limiting the scope from wider field of social memory studies. There is a lack of understanding about how the process of institutional forgetting works and how some memories stay a part of oral narratives and communicative social memory while they are omitted from the official memory represented by the official documents and events of remembering. Inspired by Paul Connerton’s article on the typology of forgetting we explore his typology in selected case studies of three public theaters located in Belgrade, focusing on remembering policy and practices investigating if a type of forgetting typical for a state/society/nation level is possible to be applied in the context of a cultural organization. We agree with Wessel and Moulds that developing common language and terminology would be important and beneficial for cross disciplinary dialogue. In this sense, the study shows how the typology of forgetting in societies can be applied and developed in the organizational memory studies and cultural management. The focus of the research is the dynamics of remembering and forgetting explored through analysis of the interaction between changing context, official institutional memories, and social communicative memories. Milena Dragićević-ŠešićMilena StefanovićUniversity of Belgradearticleorganizational forgettingorganizational memoryrememberingtraumaidentityAnthropologyGN1-890ENFRSREtnoantropološki Problemi, Vol 12, Iss 2 (2017)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN FR SR
topic	organizational forgetting organizational memory remembering trauma identity Anthropology GN1-890
spellingShingle	organizational forgetting organizational memory remembering trauma identity Anthropology GN1-890 Milena Dragićević-Šešić Milena Stefanović Organizational trauma – Types of organizational forgetting in the case of Belgrade theaters
description	Organizational memory studies (OMS) frame memory in a managerial mode, treating it as a data storage, limiting the scope from wider field of social memory studies. There is a lack of understanding about how the process of institutional forgetting works and how some memories stay a part of oral narratives and communicative social memory while they are omitted from the official memory represented by the official documents and events of remembering. Inspired by Paul Connerton’s article on the typology of forgetting we explore his typology in selected case studies of three public theaters located in Belgrade, focusing on remembering policy and practices investigating if a type of forgetting typical for a state/society/nation level is possible to be applied in the context of a cultural organization. We agree with Wessel and Moulds that developing common language and terminology would be important and beneficial for cross disciplinary dialogue. In this sense, the study shows how the typology of forgetting in societies can be applied and developed in the organizational memory studies and cultural management. The focus of the research is the dynamics of remembering and forgetting explored through analysis of the interaction between changing context, official institutional memories, and social communicative memories.
format	article
author	Milena Dragićević-Šešić Milena Stefanović
author_facet	Milena Dragićević-Šešić Milena Stefanović
author_sort	Milena Dragićević-Šešić
title	Organizational trauma – Types of organizational forgetting in the case of Belgrade theaters
title_short	Organizational trauma – Types of organizational forgetting in the case of Belgrade theaters
title_full	Organizational trauma – Types of organizational forgetting in the case of Belgrade theaters
title_fullStr	Organizational trauma – Types of organizational forgetting in the case of Belgrade theaters
title_full_unstemmed	Organizational trauma – Types of organizational forgetting in the case of Belgrade theaters
title_sort	organizational trauma – types of organizational forgetting in the case of belgrade theaters
publisher	University of Belgrade
publishDate	2017
url	https://doaj.org/article/18c8c14c865f497f9b4a922ebb81801f
work_keys_str_mv	AT milenadragicevicsesic organizationaltraumatypesoforganizationalforgettinginthecaseofbelgradetheaters AT milenastefanovic organizationaltraumatypesoforganizationalforgettinginthecaseofbelgradetheaters
_version_	1718402817302986752

Organizational trauma – Types of organizational forgetting in the case of Belgrade theaters

Ejemplares similares