Device-length changes and implant function following surgical implantation of the KineSpring in cadaver knees

Michael J McNicholas,1 Stefan M Gabriel,2 Anton G Clifford,2 Evelyne M Hasler2 1Aintree University Hospital, Teaching Hospital, Major Trauma Centre, NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK; 2Moximed, Hayward, CA, USA Introduction: The KineSpring implant system has been shown to provide load reductions...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McNicholas MJ, Gabriel SM, Clifford AG, Hasler EM
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/18ce1bf4453549bf9a95abe235769aab
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:18ce1bf4453549bf9a95abe235769aab
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:18ce1bf4453549bf9a95abe235769aab2021-12-02T00:09:31ZDevice-length changes and implant function following surgical implantation of the KineSpring in cadaver knees1179-1470https://doaj.org/article/18ce1bf4453549bf9a95abe235769aab2015-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.dovepress.com/device-length-changes-and-implant-function-following-surgical-implanta-peer-reviewed-article-MDERhttps://doaj.org/toc/1179-1470 Michael J McNicholas,1 Stefan M Gabriel,2 Anton G Clifford,2 Evelyne M Hasler2 1Aintree University Hospital, Teaching Hospital, Major Trauma Centre, NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK; 2Moximed, Hayward, CA, USA Introduction: The KineSpring implant system has been shown to provide load reductions at the medial compartment of the knee, and has demonstrated clinical success in reducing pain and increasing function in patients with medial knee osteoarthritis. These results depend on the ability of the KineSpring to rotate, lengthen, and shorten to accommodate knee motions, and in response to knee position and loading. Purpose: The present study was undertaken to determine length changes of the implanted KineSpring in response to a range of knee positions, external knee loads, and placements by different orthopedic surgeons. Materials and methods: KineSpring system components were implanted in ten cadaver leg specimens by ten orthopedic surgeons, and absorber-length changes were measured under combined loading and in different positions of the knee. Results and conclusion: Spring compression consistent with knee-load reduction, and device lengthening and shortening to accommodate knee loads and motions were seen. These confirm the functionality of the KineSpring when implanted medially to the knee. Keywords: KineSpring, knee, function, preservation, offloading, osteoarthritisMcNicholas MJGabriel SMClifford AGHasler EMDove Medical PressarticleMedical technologyR855-855.5ENMedical Devices: Evidence and Research, Vol 2015, Iss default, Pp 47-56 (2015)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medical technology
R855-855.5
spellingShingle Medical technology
R855-855.5
McNicholas MJ
Gabriel SM
Clifford AG
Hasler EM
Device-length changes and implant function following surgical implantation of the KineSpring in cadaver knees
description Michael J McNicholas,1 Stefan M Gabriel,2 Anton G Clifford,2 Evelyne M Hasler2 1Aintree University Hospital, Teaching Hospital, Major Trauma Centre, NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK; 2Moximed, Hayward, CA, USA Introduction: The KineSpring implant system has been shown to provide load reductions at the medial compartment of the knee, and has demonstrated clinical success in reducing pain and increasing function in patients with medial knee osteoarthritis. These results depend on the ability of the KineSpring to rotate, lengthen, and shorten to accommodate knee motions, and in response to knee position and loading. Purpose: The present study was undertaken to determine length changes of the implanted KineSpring in response to a range of knee positions, external knee loads, and placements by different orthopedic surgeons. Materials and methods: KineSpring system components were implanted in ten cadaver leg specimens by ten orthopedic surgeons, and absorber-length changes were measured under combined loading and in different positions of the knee. Results and conclusion: Spring compression consistent with knee-load reduction, and device lengthening and shortening to accommodate knee loads and motions were seen. These confirm the functionality of the KineSpring when implanted medially to the knee. Keywords: KineSpring, knee, function, preservation, offloading, osteoarthritis
format article
author McNicholas MJ
Gabriel SM
Clifford AG
Hasler EM
author_facet McNicholas MJ
Gabriel SM
Clifford AG
Hasler EM
author_sort McNicholas MJ
title Device-length changes and implant function following surgical implantation of the KineSpring in cadaver knees
title_short Device-length changes and implant function following surgical implantation of the KineSpring in cadaver knees
title_full Device-length changes and implant function following surgical implantation of the KineSpring in cadaver knees
title_fullStr Device-length changes and implant function following surgical implantation of the KineSpring in cadaver knees
title_full_unstemmed Device-length changes and implant function following surgical implantation of the KineSpring in cadaver knees
title_sort device-length changes and implant function following surgical implantation of the kinespring in cadaver knees
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2015
url https://doaj.org/article/18ce1bf4453549bf9a95abe235769aab
work_keys_str_mv AT mcnicholasmj devicelengthchangesandimplantfunctionfollowingsurgicalimplantationofthekinespringincadaverknees
AT gabrielsm devicelengthchangesandimplantfunctionfollowingsurgicalimplantationofthekinespringincadaverknees
AT cliffordag devicelengthchangesandimplantfunctionfollowingsurgicalimplantationofthekinespringincadaverknees
AT haslerem devicelengthchangesandimplantfunctionfollowingsurgicalimplantationofthekinespringincadaverknees
_version_ 1718403912846802944