Cohesion Policy Contributing to Territorial Cohesion – Future Scenarios

The Barca Report advocates for developmental policies to be ‘place-based’: integrated as far as they affect ‘places’. The debate on territorial cohesion is equally concerned with integrating relevant policies and actions. This requires well-established democratic institutions and adequate responses...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Andreas Faludi, Jean Peyrony
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Politecnico di Torino 2011
Materias:	Cohesion policy Place-based policies Territorial cohesion Scenarios Urban groups. The city. Urban sociology HT101-395
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/18f8c128b6914b36be52dc762de47490
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:18f8c128b6914b36be52dc762de47490
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:18f8c128b6914b36be52dc762de474902021-12-02T03:47:32ZCohesion Policy Contributing to Territorial Cohesion – Future Scenarios1650-9544https://doaj.org/article/18f8c128b6914b36be52dc762de474902011-09-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.nordregio.se/Global/EJSD/Refereed%20articles/refereed43.pdfhttps://doaj.org/toc/1650-9544The Barca Report advocates for developmental policies to be ‘place-based’: integrated as far as they affect ‘places’. The debate on territorial cohesion is equally concerned with integrating relevant policies and actions. This requires well-established democratic institutions and adequate responses to the demands of technical systems and of markets. Following Lisbeth Hooghe and Gary Marks, the respective arrangements are described as Governance Type I and Type II. All levels of government, including that of the EU, partake in both types, but relations between them are problematic, particularly in the context of Europe 2020: Will this EU strategy be mainly a matter for Directorate-Generals and their various clients pursuing their policies (Governance Type II), or will Cohesion policy, with its more integrated and decentralised approach, involving many levels of government and stakeholders (Governance Type I) form platforms for integrating them? This paper presents four scenarios; each based on a combination of strong/weak Governance Type I and Type II, which are labelled as the ‘Anglo-Saxon’, ‘Saint-Simonian’, ‘Rhineland’ and the ‘European’ Scenarios. The authors prefer the latter, but the best one can hope for in the short term is for this option not to fall by the wayside.Andreas FaludiJean PeyronyPolitecnico di TorinoarticleCohesion policyPlace-based policiesTerritorial cohesionScenariosUrban groups. The city. Urban sociologyHT101-395ENEuropean Journal of Spatial Development, Vol September, Iss 43 (2011)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Cohesion policy Place-based policies Territorial cohesion Scenarios Urban groups. The city. Urban sociology HT101-395
spellingShingle	Cohesion policy Place-based policies Territorial cohesion Scenarios Urban groups. The city. Urban sociology HT101-395 Andreas Faludi Jean Peyrony Cohesion Policy Contributing to Territorial Cohesion – Future Scenarios
description	The Barca Report advocates for developmental policies to be ‘place-based’: integrated as far as they affect ‘places’. The debate on territorial cohesion is equally concerned with integrating relevant policies and actions. This requires well-established democratic institutions and adequate responses to the demands of technical systems and of markets. Following Lisbeth Hooghe and Gary Marks, the respective arrangements are described as Governance Type I and Type II. All levels of government, including that of the EU, partake in both types, but relations between them are problematic, particularly in the context of Europe 2020: Will this EU strategy be mainly a matter for Directorate-Generals and their various clients pursuing their policies (Governance Type II), or will Cohesion policy, with its more integrated and decentralised approach, involving many levels of government and stakeholders (Governance Type I) form platforms for integrating them? This paper presents four scenarios; each based on a combination of strong/weak Governance Type I and Type II, which are labelled as the ‘Anglo-Saxon’, ‘Saint-Simonian’, ‘Rhineland’ and the ‘European’ Scenarios. The authors prefer the latter, but the best one can hope for in the short term is for this option not to fall by the wayside.
format	article
author	Andreas Faludi Jean Peyrony
author_facet	Andreas Faludi Jean Peyrony
author_sort	Andreas Faludi
title	Cohesion Policy Contributing to Territorial Cohesion – Future Scenarios
title_short	Cohesion Policy Contributing to Territorial Cohesion – Future Scenarios
title_full	Cohesion Policy Contributing to Territorial Cohesion – Future Scenarios
title_fullStr	Cohesion Policy Contributing to Territorial Cohesion – Future Scenarios
title_full_unstemmed	Cohesion Policy Contributing to Territorial Cohesion – Future Scenarios
title_sort	cohesion policy contributing to territorial cohesion – future scenarios
publisher	Politecnico di Torino
publishDate	2011
url	https://doaj.org/article/18f8c128b6914b36be52dc762de47490
work_keys_str_mv	AT andreasfaludi cohesionpolicycontributingtoterritorialcohesionfuturescenarios AT jeanpeyrony cohesionpolicycontributingtoterritorialcohesionfuturescenarios
_version_	1718401624822513664

Cohesion Policy Contributing to Territorial Cohesion – Future Scenarios

Ejemplares similares