The validation of peer review through research impact measures and the implications for funding strategies.
There is a paucity of data in the literature concerning the validation of the grant application peer review process, which is used to help direct billions of dollars in research funds. Ultimately, this validation will hinge upon empirical data relating the output of funded projects to the prediction...
Enregistré dans:
Auteurs principaux: | Stephen A Gallo, Afton S Carpenter, David Irwin, Caitlin D McPartland, Joseph Travis, Sofie Reynders, Lisa A Thompson, Scott R Glisson |
---|---|
Format: | article |
Langue: | EN |
Publié: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2014
|
Sujets: | |
Accès en ligne: | https://doaj.org/article/193683a1e52e45c9ab5bc3d71216d006 |
Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
Documents similaires
-
Peer review, program officers and science funding.
par: Paul J Roebber, et autres
Publié: (2011) -
Care and feeding of the endocannabinoid system: a systematic review of potential clinical interventions that upregulate the endocannabinoid system.
par: John M McPartland, et autres
Publié: (2014) -
Interpretation by the fund
par: Gold, Joseph
Publié: (1968) -
The validity of peer review in a general medicine journal.
par: Jeffrey L Jackson, et autres
Publié: (2011) -
Living in seaside caravans: new survey evidence and the implications for local authority funding
par: Christina Beatty, et autres
Publié: (2012)