Does “It” Work in Turkey? A Network Agenda-Setting Research
Traditional agenda-setting researches based on the media’s claim to be effective in public opinion, second-stage agenda-setting researches have emerged at the end of the 1990s. Following these studies which support the idea that the significance levels were also related to the attitudes, more than t...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN TR |
| Publicado: |
Erciyes University
2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/198dfa8a7d004798b7acba0465461572 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | Traditional agenda-setting researches based on the media’s claim to be effective in public
opinion, second-stage agenda-setting researches have emerged at the end of the 1990s.
Following these studies which support the idea that the significance levels were also
related to the attitudes, more than these studies have been carried out in the third stage
agenda setting researches. The first network agenda setting (NAS) study were carried out
by Guo, McCombs and Shaw in 2011. The number of researches conducted so far is quite
low. Therefore, it should be noted that the subject is quite new and there is an important
gap in the research and testing of the basic hypothesis. According to the agenda-setting
network model used in the third-level of agenda-setting studies (Network agenda-setting,
NAS), bilateral networks and relations between issues and events can be transferred to
the public’s agenda via the media through the media According to the new model, the
news bodies connect different events and objects, and this connection simultaneously
created in the public mind This study examines the hypothesis of third level of agendasetting under the conditions of Turkish culture in Turkey. Does it work in Turkey? |
|---|