Publication bias in reports of animal stroke studies leads to major overstatement of efficacy.
The consolidation of scientific knowledge proceeds through the interpretation and then distillation of data presented in research reports, first in review articles and then in textbooks and undergraduate courses, until truths become accepted as such both amongst "experts" and in the public...
Enregistré dans:
Auteurs principaux: | Emily S Sena, H Bart van der Worp, Philip M W Bath, David W Howells, Malcolm R Macleod |
---|---|
Format: | article |
Langue: | EN |
Publié: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2010
|
Sujets: | |
Accès en ligne: | https://doaj.org/article/19af55a6f9af4bcba9e677d9b37bdee5 |
Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
Documents similaires
-
Can animal models of disease reliably inform human studies?
par: H Bart van der Worp, et autres
Publié: (2010) -
Evaluation of excess significance bias in animal studies of neurological diseases.
par: Konstantinos K Tsilidis, et autres
Publié: (2013) -
Stem cell transplantation in traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of animal studies.
par: Ana Antonic, et autres
Publié: (2013) -
Using median survival in meta-analysis of experimental time-to-event data
par: Theodore C. Hirst, et autres
Publié: (2021) -
Considering lead-time bias in evaluating the effectiveness of lung cancer screening with real-world data
par: Szu-Chun Yang, et autres
Publié: (2021)