Qualitative differences in the mindsets associated with dual nature of normative commitment.

This study aims to o uncover how employees' normative commitment (sense of obligation) to their organization is experienced in terms of dual normative commitment (moral imperative or indebted obligation) and to describe the potential for different mindsets arising through the dynamic combinatio...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Hyun Sung Oh, Sukanlaya Sawang
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:	Medicine R Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/19d3dbf060204c64a705f0a6d3379d94
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:19d3dbf060204c64a705f0a6d3379d94
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:19d3dbf060204c64a705f0a6d3379d942021-11-25T06:23:32ZQualitative differences in the mindsets associated with dual nature of normative commitment.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0251193https://doaj.org/article/19d3dbf060204c64a705f0a6d3379d942021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251193https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203This study aims to o uncover how employees' normative commitment (sense of obligation) to their organization is experienced in terms of dual normative commitment (moral imperative or indebted obligation) and to describe the potential for different mindsets arising through the dynamic combination of the various components in the commitment profile. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 16 participants. The interviews were designed to identify the respondents' perceptions of obligation to their organisation, and their underlying motivational mindset associating with dual nature of normative commitment The interview findings for the affective-normative commitment dominant and the continuance commitment dominant participants were consistent with normative commitment experienced as either moral imperative or an indebted obligation, depending on the relative levels of affective and continuance commitment. All participants irrespective of their commitment profile noted that they had commitment to multiple foci, however, the alignment between commitment to these various foci differed by commitment profile. The qualitative differences among the commitment profiles indicated that the interaction of the commitment components is more complex than current commitment profile propositions suggest and that further theory development beyond the mindsets associated with continuance commitment and affective-normative commitment dominant profiles is required.Hyun Sung OhSukanlaya SawangPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 6, p e0251193 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R Science Q
spellingShingle	Medicine R Science Q Hyun Sung Oh Sukanlaya Sawang Qualitative differences in the mindsets associated with dual nature of normative commitment.
description	This study aims to o uncover how employees' normative commitment (sense of obligation) to their organization is experienced in terms of dual normative commitment (moral imperative or indebted obligation) and to describe the potential for different mindsets arising through the dynamic combination of the various components in the commitment profile. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 16 participants. The interviews were designed to identify the respondents' perceptions of obligation to their organisation, and their underlying motivational mindset associating with dual nature of normative commitment The interview findings for the affective-normative commitment dominant and the continuance commitment dominant participants were consistent with normative commitment experienced as either moral imperative or an indebted obligation, depending on the relative levels of affective and continuance commitment. All participants irrespective of their commitment profile noted that they had commitment to multiple foci, however, the alignment between commitment to these various foci differed by commitment profile. The qualitative differences among the commitment profiles indicated that the interaction of the commitment components is more complex than current commitment profile propositions suggest and that further theory development beyond the mindsets associated with continuance commitment and affective-normative commitment dominant profiles is required.
format	article
author	Hyun Sung Oh Sukanlaya Sawang
author_facet	Hyun Sung Oh Sukanlaya Sawang
author_sort	Hyun Sung Oh
title	Qualitative differences in the mindsets associated with dual nature of normative commitment.
title_short	Qualitative differences in the mindsets associated with dual nature of normative commitment.
title_full	Qualitative differences in the mindsets associated with dual nature of normative commitment.
title_fullStr	Qualitative differences in the mindsets associated with dual nature of normative commitment.
title_full_unstemmed	Qualitative differences in the mindsets associated with dual nature of normative commitment.
title_sort	qualitative differences in the mindsets associated with dual nature of normative commitment.
publisher	Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/19d3dbf060204c64a705f0a6d3379d94
work_keys_str_mv	AT hyunsungoh qualitativedifferencesinthemindsetsassociatedwithdualnatureofnormativecommitment AT sukanlayasawang qualitativedifferencesinthemindsetsassociatedwithdualnatureofnormativecommitment
_version_	1718413788901801984

Qualitative differences in the mindsets associated with dual nature of normative commitment.

Ejemplares similares