Geometry of implant abutment surface improving cement effectiveness: An In vitro study

Aim: The aim of the study was to investigate whether the surface geometry or topography of implant abutments affects the retentive strength of prosthesis cemented with zinc phosphate on standard machined, sandblasted, and grooved implant abutments and to compare the results between them. Materials a...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aradhana Rathod, Mohammad Jalaluddin, Shrinivas, Trupti Jagannath Devadiga, Shruti Jha, Khaled M Alzahrani
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/19df153cd8dd40c1823e1a53c6fc79ce
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:19df153cd8dd40c1823e1a53c6fc79ce
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:19df153cd8dd40c1823e1a53c6fc79ce2021-11-19T12:15:52ZGeometry of implant abutment surface improving cement effectiveness: An In vitro study0975-740610.4103/jpbs.jpbs_176_21https://doaj.org/article/19df153cd8dd40c1823e1a53c6fc79ce2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2021;volume=13;issue=6;spage=1093;epage=1097;aulast=Rathodhttps://doaj.org/toc/0975-7406Aim: The aim of the study was to investigate whether the surface geometry or topography of implant abutments affects the retentive strength of prosthesis cemented with zinc phosphate on standard machined, sandblasted, and grooved implant abutments and to compare the results between them. Materials and Methods: Fifteen similarly shaped implant abutments (MDcpk61; MIS Implant Technologies Ltd.,) (height 6.0 mm and 6-degree taper) were divided into three groups (n = 05): Group I – standard machined abutments without grooves, Group II – sandblasted abutments (same as Group I but sandblasted with 50 μ aluminum oxide), and Group III – abutment with prefabricated circumferential grooves. Further in these groups of 15 abutments, 5 abutments each are to be taken to check the retentive force of zinc phosphate cement. Fifteen identical cast copings was prepared to fit all 15 abutments. The castings will be cemented to each group of abutments with an above-mentioned luting agent. After thermal cycling and storage for 6 days in a water bath, a retention test is to be done with a tensile testing machine (Instron) (5 mm/min) and retentive forces will be recorded. Data will be subjected to one-way ANOVA test and Student's t-test. Results: For zinc phosphate cement, F = 30.53 (>3.59 for P = 0.05) shows a statistically significant difference between all the three groups. Conclusion: Circumferential grooves on implant abutments give better retention when compared with standard machined (plain) and sandblasted abutments despite marked difference. Clinical Significance: Retention of restoration depends on the surface of the abutment as well as the luting agents used. Incorporation of retentive grooves can enhance retention of prosthesis, especially in situation of short abutments.Aradhana RathodMohammad JalaluddinShrinivasTrupti Jagannath DevadigaShruti JhaKhaled M AlzahraniWolters Kluwer Medknow Publicationsarticlecircumferential grooved implant abutmentsluting agentsretentive strengthPharmacy and materia medicaRS1-441Analytical chemistryQD71-142ENJournal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences, Vol 13, Iss 6, Pp 1093-1097 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic circumferential grooved implant abutments
luting agents
retentive strength
Pharmacy and materia medica
RS1-441
Analytical chemistry
QD71-142
spellingShingle circumferential grooved implant abutments
luting agents
retentive strength
Pharmacy and materia medica
RS1-441
Analytical chemistry
QD71-142
Aradhana Rathod
Mohammad Jalaluddin
Shrinivas
Trupti Jagannath Devadiga
Shruti Jha
Khaled M Alzahrani
Geometry of implant abutment surface improving cement effectiveness: An In vitro study
description Aim: The aim of the study was to investigate whether the surface geometry or topography of implant abutments affects the retentive strength of prosthesis cemented with zinc phosphate on standard machined, sandblasted, and grooved implant abutments and to compare the results between them. Materials and Methods: Fifteen similarly shaped implant abutments (MDcpk61; MIS Implant Technologies Ltd.,) (height 6.0 mm and 6-degree taper) were divided into three groups (n = 05): Group I – standard machined abutments without grooves, Group II – sandblasted abutments (same as Group I but sandblasted with 50 μ aluminum oxide), and Group III – abutment with prefabricated circumferential grooves. Further in these groups of 15 abutments, 5 abutments each are to be taken to check the retentive force of zinc phosphate cement. Fifteen identical cast copings was prepared to fit all 15 abutments. The castings will be cemented to each group of abutments with an above-mentioned luting agent. After thermal cycling and storage for 6 days in a water bath, a retention test is to be done with a tensile testing machine (Instron) (5 mm/min) and retentive forces will be recorded. Data will be subjected to one-way ANOVA test and Student's t-test. Results: For zinc phosphate cement, F = 30.53 (>3.59 for P = 0.05) shows a statistically significant difference between all the three groups. Conclusion: Circumferential grooves on implant abutments give better retention when compared with standard machined (plain) and sandblasted abutments despite marked difference. Clinical Significance: Retention of restoration depends on the surface of the abutment as well as the luting agents used. Incorporation of retentive grooves can enhance retention of prosthesis, especially in situation of short abutments.
format article
author Aradhana Rathod
Mohammad Jalaluddin
Shrinivas
Trupti Jagannath Devadiga
Shruti Jha
Khaled M Alzahrani
author_facet Aradhana Rathod
Mohammad Jalaluddin
Shrinivas
Trupti Jagannath Devadiga
Shruti Jha
Khaled M Alzahrani
author_sort Aradhana Rathod
title Geometry of implant abutment surface improving cement effectiveness: An In vitro study
title_short Geometry of implant abutment surface improving cement effectiveness: An In vitro study
title_full Geometry of implant abutment surface improving cement effectiveness: An In vitro study
title_fullStr Geometry of implant abutment surface improving cement effectiveness: An In vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Geometry of implant abutment surface improving cement effectiveness: An In vitro study
title_sort geometry of implant abutment surface improving cement effectiveness: an in vitro study
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/19df153cd8dd40c1823e1a53c6fc79ce
work_keys_str_mv AT aradhanarathod geometryofimplantabutmentsurfaceimprovingcementeffectivenessaninvitrostudy
AT mohammadjalaluddin geometryofimplantabutmentsurfaceimprovingcementeffectivenessaninvitrostudy
AT shrinivas geometryofimplantabutmentsurfaceimprovingcementeffectivenessaninvitrostudy
AT truptijagannathdevadiga geometryofimplantabutmentsurfaceimprovingcementeffectivenessaninvitrostudy
AT shrutijha geometryofimplantabutmentsurfaceimprovingcementeffectivenessaninvitrostudy
AT khaledmalzahrani geometryofimplantabutmentsurfaceimprovingcementeffectivenessaninvitrostudy
_version_ 1718420116250558464