Obraz przeszłości w percepcji magiczno-mitycznej, czyli pamięć w działaniu

The aim of the paper is to identify a specific type of cognitive conduct, which can be called magical-mythical perception and thinking. It is based on a relevant habitus and its principle is indistinctness (blending, blurring), where differences between diverse phenomena, memory images and notions...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Jan Kajfosz
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN PL
Publicado:	Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing 2021
Materias:	social memory postmemory psychological essentialism cognitive blending connotation Law K Political science J
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/19fbe6a90b0b44619cefead989065825
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:19fbe6a90b0b44619cefead989065825
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:19fbe6a90b0b44619cefead9890658252021-11-27T13:08:02ZObraz przeszłości w percepcji magiczno-mitycznej, czyli pamięć w działaniu10.12797/Politeja.12.2015.35.031733-67162391-6737https://doaj.org/article/19fbe6a90b0b44619cefead9890658252021-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journals.akademicka.pl/politeja/article/view/2316https://doaj.org/toc/1733-6716https://doaj.org/toc/2391-6737 The aim of the paper is to identify a specific type of cognitive conduct, which can be called magical-mythical perception and thinking. It is based on a relevant habitus and its principle is indistinctness (blending, blurring), where differences between diverse phenomena, memory images and notions disappear in perception and imagination, as well as between denotation and connotation. Such an indistinctness can have considerable impact on social memories. The author identifies in such a cognitive conduct the possible key to the following questions: How is it possible that we can perfectly adopt different representations of the past and internalize them as our past? How can we reconcile different representations of the past and how is it possible that diverse representations of the past merge in one social memory? Such amalgamations of various forms of representations and diverse scales of objectification can be clarified by means of the theory of magic and by means of Roland Barthes´ theory of myth. The main proposition of the paper is to identify, for the first, the unconscious structure (a habitus formed in the historical process), which defines a manner of experiencing the world, speaking about the world and making choices in that world. For the second, the criteria a person uses to select and evaluate narratives about the past. Jan KajfoszKsiegarnia Akademicka Publishingarticlesocial memorypostmemorypsychological essentialismcognitive blendingconnotationLawKPolitical scienceJENPLPoliteja, Vol 12, Iss 3 (35) (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN PL
topic	social memory postmemory psychological essentialism cognitive blending connotation Law K Political science J
spellingShingle	social memory postmemory psychological essentialism cognitive blending connotation Law K Political science J Jan Kajfosz Obraz przeszłości w percepcji magiczno-mitycznej, czyli pamięć w działaniu
description	The aim of the paper is to identify a specific type of cognitive conduct, which can be called magical-mythical perception and thinking. It is based on a relevant habitus and its principle is indistinctness (blending, blurring), where differences between diverse phenomena, memory images and notions disappear in perception and imagination, as well as between denotation and connotation. Such an indistinctness can have considerable impact on social memories. The author identifies in such a cognitive conduct the possible key to the following questions: How is it possible that we can perfectly adopt different representations of the past and internalize them as our past? How can we reconcile different representations of the past and how is it possible that diverse representations of the past merge in one social memory? Such amalgamations of various forms of representations and diverse scales of objectification can be clarified by means of the theory of magic and by means of Roland Barthes´ theory of myth. The main proposition of the paper is to identify, for the first, the unconscious structure (a habitus formed in the historical process), which defines a manner of experiencing the world, speaking about the world and making choices in that world. For the second, the criteria a person uses to select and evaluate narratives about the past.
format	article
author	Jan Kajfosz
author_facet	Jan Kajfosz
author_sort	Jan Kajfosz
title	Obraz przeszłości w percepcji magiczno-mitycznej, czyli pamięć w działaniu
title_short	Obraz przeszłości w percepcji magiczno-mitycznej, czyli pamięć w działaniu
title_full	Obraz przeszłości w percepcji magiczno-mitycznej, czyli pamięć w działaniu
title_fullStr	Obraz przeszłości w percepcji magiczno-mitycznej, czyli pamięć w działaniu
title_full_unstemmed	Obraz przeszłości w percepcji magiczno-mitycznej, czyli pamięć w działaniu
title_sort	obraz przeszłości w percepcji magiczno-mitycznej, czyli pamięć w działaniu
publisher	Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/19fbe6a90b0b44619cefead989065825
work_keys_str_mv	AT jankajfosz obrazprzeszłosciwpercepcjimagicznomitycznejczylipamiecwdziałaniu
_version_	1718408726300327936

Obraz przeszłości w percepcji magiczno-mitycznej, czyli pamięć w działaniu

Ejemplares similares