Microbial Functional Capacity Is Preserved Within Engineered Soil Formulations Used In Mine Site Restoration

Abstract Mining of mineral resources produces substantial volumes of crushed rock based wastes that are characterised by poor physical structure and hydrology, unstable geochemistry and potentially toxic chemical conditions. Recycling of these substrates is desirable and can be achieved by blending...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deepak Kumaresan, Adam T Cross, Benjamin Moreira-Grez, Khalil Kariman, Paul Nevill, Jason Stevens, Richard J N Allcock, Anthony G O’Donnell, Kingsley W Dixon, Andrew S Whiteley
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2017
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/1a099952c39f4fdeae96f1d57671b9be
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:1a099952c39f4fdeae96f1d57671b9be
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:1a099952c39f4fdeae96f1d57671b9be2021-12-02T16:06:05ZMicrobial Functional Capacity Is Preserved Within Engineered Soil Formulations Used In Mine Site Restoration10.1038/s41598-017-00650-62045-2322https://doaj.org/article/1a099952c39f4fdeae96f1d57671b9be2017-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00650-6https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Mining of mineral resources produces substantial volumes of crushed rock based wastes that are characterised by poor physical structure and hydrology, unstable geochemistry and potentially toxic chemical conditions. Recycling of these substrates is desirable and can be achieved by blending waste with native soil to form a ‘novel substrate’ which may be used in future landscape restoration. However, these post-mining substrate based ‘soils’ are likely to contain significant abiotic constraints for both plant and microbial growth. Effective use of these novel substrates for ecosystem restoration will depend on the efficacy of stored topsoil as a potential microbial inoculum as well as the subsequent generation of key microbial soil functions originally apparent in local pristine sites. Here, using both marker gene and shotgun metagenome sequencing, we show that topsoil storage and the blending of soil and waste substrates to form planting substrates gives rise to variable bacterial and archaeal phylogenetic composition but a high degree of metabolic conservation at the community metagenome level. Our data indicates that whilst low phylogenetic conservation is apparent across substrate blends we observe high functional redundancy in relation to key soil microbial pathways, allowing the potential for functional recovery of key belowground pathways under targeted management.Deepak KumaresanAdam T CrossBenjamin Moreira-GrezKhalil KarimanPaul NevillJason StevensRichard J N AllcockAnthony G O’DonnellKingsley W DixonAndrew S WhiteleyNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Deepak Kumaresan
Adam T Cross
Benjamin Moreira-Grez
Khalil Kariman
Paul Nevill
Jason Stevens
Richard J N Allcock
Anthony G O’Donnell
Kingsley W Dixon
Andrew S Whiteley
Microbial Functional Capacity Is Preserved Within Engineered Soil Formulations Used In Mine Site Restoration
description Abstract Mining of mineral resources produces substantial volumes of crushed rock based wastes that are characterised by poor physical structure and hydrology, unstable geochemistry and potentially toxic chemical conditions. Recycling of these substrates is desirable and can be achieved by blending waste with native soil to form a ‘novel substrate’ which may be used in future landscape restoration. However, these post-mining substrate based ‘soils’ are likely to contain significant abiotic constraints for both plant and microbial growth. Effective use of these novel substrates for ecosystem restoration will depend on the efficacy of stored topsoil as a potential microbial inoculum as well as the subsequent generation of key microbial soil functions originally apparent in local pristine sites. Here, using both marker gene and shotgun metagenome sequencing, we show that topsoil storage and the blending of soil and waste substrates to form planting substrates gives rise to variable bacterial and archaeal phylogenetic composition but a high degree of metabolic conservation at the community metagenome level. Our data indicates that whilst low phylogenetic conservation is apparent across substrate blends we observe high functional redundancy in relation to key soil microbial pathways, allowing the potential for functional recovery of key belowground pathways under targeted management.
format article
author Deepak Kumaresan
Adam T Cross
Benjamin Moreira-Grez
Khalil Kariman
Paul Nevill
Jason Stevens
Richard J N Allcock
Anthony G O’Donnell
Kingsley W Dixon
Andrew S Whiteley
author_facet Deepak Kumaresan
Adam T Cross
Benjamin Moreira-Grez
Khalil Kariman
Paul Nevill
Jason Stevens
Richard J N Allcock
Anthony G O’Donnell
Kingsley W Dixon
Andrew S Whiteley
author_sort Deepak Kumaresan
title Microbial Functional Capacity Is Preserved Within Engineered Soil Formulations Used In Mine Site Restoration
title_short Microbial Functional Capacity Is Preserved Within Engineered Soil Formulations Used In Mine Site Restoration
title_full Microbial Functional Capacity Is Preserved Within Engineered Soil Formulations Used In Mine Site Restoration
title_fullStr Microbial Functional Capacity Is Preserved Within Engineered Soil Formulations Used In Mine Site Restoration
title_full_unstemmed Microbial Functional Capacity Is Preserved Within Engineered Soil Formulations Used In Mine Site Restoration
title_sort microbial functional capacity is preserved within engineered soil formulations used in mine site restoration
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/1a099952c39f4fdeae96f1d57671b9be
work_keys_str_mv AT deepakkumaresan microbialfunctionalcapacityispreservedwithinengineeredsoilformulationsusedinminesiterestoration
AT adamtcross microbialfunctionalcapacityispreservedwithinengineeredsoilformulationsusedinminesiterestoration
AT benjaminmoreiragrez microbialfunctionalcapacityispreservedwithinengineeredsoilformulationsusedinminesiterestoration
AT khalilkariman microbialfunctionalcapacityispreservedwithinengineeredsoilformulationsusedinminesiterestoration
AT paulnevill microbialfunctionalcapacityispreservedwithinengineeredsoilformulationsusedinminesiterestoration
AT jasonstevens microbialfunctionalcapacityispreservedwithinengineeredsoilformulationsusedinminesiterestoration
AT richardjnallcock microbialfunctionalcapacityispreservedwithinengineeredsoilformulationsusedinminesiterestoration
AT anthonygodonnell microbialfunctionalcapacityispreservedwithinengineeredsoilformulationsusedinminesiterestoration
AT kingsleywdixon microbialfunctionalcapacityispreservedwithinengineeredsoilformulationsusedinminesiterestoration
AT andrewswhiteley microbialfunctionalcapacityispreservedwithinengineeredsoilformulationsusedinminesiterestoration
_version_ 1718385073138434048