Financing cultural heritage

Financial policy is very important for the development of cultural heritage. Without an efficient funding system, there is no successful preservation of cultural heritage. Effective financing depends not only on the legislative policy, but also on all participants in this field, starting from the so...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Pušara Aleksandra B.
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
SR
Publicado: Institute of Serbian Culture Priština, Leposavić 2021
Materias:
D
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/1a0bb5501bea4dfdb72d14f743596226
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:1a0bb5501bea4dfdb72d14f743596226
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:1a0bb5501bea4dfdb72d14f7435962262021-12-05T18:02:10ZFinancing cultural heritage0353-90082683-579710.5937/bastina31-32774https://doaj.org/article/1a0bb5501bea4dfdb72d14f7435962262021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0353-9008/2021/0353-90082154479P.pdfhttps://doaj.org/toc/0353-9008https://doaj.org/toc/2683-5797Financial policy is very important for the development of cultural heritage. Without an efficient funding system, there is no successful preservation of cultural heritage. Effective financing depends not only on the legislative policy, but also on all participants in this field, starting from the social understanding of heritage to its knowledge by potential investors. In recent years, there has been an increase in the need to preserve cultural heritage, and thus an increase in the demand for financial resources for its preservation. The reasons are, obviously, in a larger number of facilities that require renovation, expansion of works and procedures aimed at their conservation and preservation, and the decreasing volume of public finances allocated for these purposes. Cultural heritage is a public good and that is why its preservation is difficult to imagine without investing public funds. Public funding of cultural heritage has multiple positive effects for the state. The immediate effect is, of course, the preserved and restored cultural heritage, and the indirect ones are wider. These are new jobs, support for traditional crafts, development of tourism and the local economy, improvement of infrastructure and living environment. Public financing of cultural heritage must not be seen as a burden, but as an investment that will return many times over. Of course, it is necessary to focus on donors, project financing, funds from various European programs and organizations, in order to provide as much diverse financing of cultural heritage as possible in the future. The paper gives an overview of the ways of financing cultural heritage in three European countries: Germany and the Netherlands.Pušara Aleksandra B.Institute of Serbian Culture Priština, Leposavićarticlecultural heritagecultural policyfinancing of cultural heritagecohesion policyHistory (General) and history of EuropeDSocial sciences (General)H1-99ENSRBaština, Vol 2021, Iss 54, Pp 479-491 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
SR
topic cultural heritage
cultural policy
financing of cultural heritage
cohesion policy
History (General) and history of Europe
D
Social sciences (General)
H1-99
spellingShingle cultural heritage
cultural policy
financing of cultural heritage
cohesion policy
History (General) and history of Europe
D
Social sciences (General)
H1-99
Pušara Aleksandra B.
Financing cultural heritage
description Financial policy is very important for the development of cultural heritage. Without an efficient funding system, there is no successful preservation of cultural heritage. Effective financing depends not only on the legislative policy, but also on all participants in this field, starting from the social understanding of heritage to its knowledge by potential investors. In recent years, there has been an increase in the need to preserve cultural heritage, and thus an increase in the demand for financial resources for its preservation. The reasons are, obviously, in a larger number of facilities that require renovation, expansion of works and procedures aimed at their conservation and preservation, and the decreasing volume of public finances allocated for these purposes. Cultural heritage is a public good and that is why its preservation is difficult to imagine without investing public funds. Public funding of cultural heritage has multiple positive effects for the state. The immediate effect is, of course, the preserved and restored cultural heritage, and the indirect ones are wider. These are new jobs, support for traditional crafts, development of tourism and the local economy, improvement of infrastructure and living environment. Public financing of cultural heritage must not be seen as a burden, but as an investment that will return many times over. Of course, it is necessary to focus on donors, project financing, funds from various European programs and organizations, in order to provide as much diverse financing of cultural heritage as possible in the future. The paper gives an overview of the ways of financing cultural heritage in three European countries: Germany and the Netherlands.
format article
author Pušara Aleksandra B.
author_facet Pušara Aleksandra B.
author_sort Pušara Aleksandra B.
title Financing cultural heritage
title_short Financing cultural heritage
title_full Financing cultural heritage
title_fullStr Financing cultural heritage
title_full_unstemmed Financing cultural heritage
title_sort financing cultural heritage
publisher Institute of Serbian Culture Priština, Leposavić
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/1a0bb5501bea4dfdb72d14f743596226
work_keys_str_mv AT pusaraaleksandrab financingculturalheritage
_version_ 1718371224888803328