Smoking Cessation Apps: A Systematic Review of Format, Outcomes, and Features

Smoking cessation interventions are effective, but they are not easily accessible for all treatment-seeking smokers. Mobile health (mHealth) apps have been used in recent years to overcome some of these limitations. Smoking cessation apps can be used in combination with a face-to-face intervention (...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: María Barroso-Hurtado, Daniel Suárez-Castro, Carmela Martínez-Vispo, Elisardo Becoña, Ana López-Durán
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/1a0f6c8e3ea843318d25b25e539fb643
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:1a0f6c8e3ea843318d25b25e539fb643
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:1a0f6c8e3ea843318d25b25e539fb6432021-11-11T16:45:37ZSmoking Cessation Apps: A Systematic Review of Format, Outcomes, and Features10.3390/ijerph1821116641660-46011661-7827https://doaj.org/article/1a0f6c8e3ea843318d25b25e539fb6432021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/21/11664https://doaj.org/toc/1661-7827https://doaj.org/toc/1660-4601Smoking cessation interventions are effective, but they are not easily accessible for all treatment-seeking smokers. Mobile health (mHealth) apps have been used in recent years to overcome some of these limitations. Smoking cessation apps can be used in combination with a face-to-face intervention (FFSC-Apps), or alone as general apps (GSC-Apps). The aims of this review were (1) to examine the effects of FFSC-Apps and GSC-Apps on abstinence, tobacco use, and relapse rates; and (2) to describe their features. A systematic review was conducted following the internationally Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Of the total 6016 studies screened, 24 were included, of which nine used GSC-Apps and 15 FFSC-Apps. Eight studies reported significant differences between conditions in smoking cessation outcomes, with three of them being in favor of the use of apps, and two between different point-assessments. Concerning Apps features, most GSC-Apps included self-tracking and setting a quit plan, whereas most of the FFSC-Apps included self-tracking and carbon monoxide (CO) measures. Smartphone apps for smoking cessation could be promising tools. However, more research with an adequate methodological quality is needed to determine its effect. Nevertheless, smartphone apps’ high availability and attractiveness represent a great opportunity to reach large populations.María Barroso-HurtadoDaniel Suárez-CastroCarmela Martínez-VispoElisardo BecoñaAna López-DuránMDPI AGarticlesmoking cessationmHealthsmartphonemobile phonedigital healthsystematic reviewMedicineRENInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol 18, Iss 11664, p 11664 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic smoking cessation
mHealth
smartphone
mobile phone
digital health
systematic review
Medicine
R
spellingShingle smoking cessation
mHealth
smartphone
mobile phone
digital health
systematic review
Medicine
R
María Barroso-Hurtado
Daniel Suárez-Castro
Carmela Martínez-Vispo
Elisardo Becoña
Ana López-Durán
Smoking Cessation Apps: A Systematic Review of Format, Outcomes, and Features
description Smoking cessation interventions are effective, but they are not easily accessible for all treatment-seeking smokers. Mobile health (mHealth) apps have been used in recent years to overcome some of these limitations. Smoking cessation apps can be used in combination with a face-to-face intervention (FFSC-Apps), or alone as general apps (GSC-Apps). The aims of this review were (1) to examine the effects of FFSC-Apps and GSC-Apps on abstinence, tobacco use, and relapse rates; and (2) to describe their features. A systematic review was conducted following the internationally Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Of the total 6016 studies screened, 24 were included, of which nine used GSC-Apps and 15 FFSC-Apps. Eight studies reported significant differences between conditions in smoking cessation outcomes, with three of them being in favor of the use of apps, and two between different point-assessments. Concerning Apps features, most GSC-Apps included self-tracking and setting a quit plan, whereas most of the FFSC-Apps included self-tracking and carbon monoxide (CO) measures. Smartphone apps for smoking cessation could be promising tools. However, more research with an adequate methodological quality is needed to determine its effect. Nevertheless, smartphone apps’ high availability and attractiveness represent a great opportunity to reach large populations.
format article
author María Barroso-Hurtado
Daniel Suárez-Castro
Carmela Martínez-Vispo
Elisardo Becoña
Ana López-Durán
author_facet María Barroso-Hurtado
Daniel Suárez-Castro
Carmela Martínez-Vispo
Elisardo Becoña
Ana López-Durán
author_sort María Barroso-Hurtado
title Smoking Cessation Apps: A Systematic Review of Format, Outcomes, and Features
title_short Smoking Cessation Apps: A Systematic Review of Format, Outcomes, and Features
title_full Smoking Cessation Apps: A Systematic Review of Format, Outcomes, and Features
title_fullStr Smoking Cessation Apps: A Systematic Review of Format, Outcomes, and Features
title_full_unstemmed Smoking Cessation Apps: A Systematic Review of Format, Outcomes, and Features
title_sort smoking cessation apps: a systematic review of format, outcomes, and features
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/1a0f6c8e3ea843318d25b25e539fb643
work_keys_str_mv AT mariabarrosohurtado smokingcessationappsasystematicreviewofformatoutcomesandfeatures
AT danielsuarezcastro smokingcessationappsasystematicreviewofformatoutcomesandfeatures
AT carmelamartinezvispo smokingcessationappsasystematicreviewofformatoutcomesandfeatures
AT elisardobecona smokingcessationappsasystematicreviewofformatoutcomesandfeatures
AT analopezduran smokingcessationappsasystematicreviewofformatoutcomesandfeatures
_version_ 1718432224005586944