What drives sound symbolism? Different acoustic cues underlie sound-size and sound-shape mappings

Abstract Sound symbolism refers to the non-arbitrary mappings that exist between phonetic properties of speech sounds and their meaning. Despite there being an extensive literature on the topic, the acoustic features and psychological mechanisms that give rise to sound symbolism are not, as yet, alt...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klemens Knoeferle, Jixing Li, Emanuela Maggioni, Charles Spence
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2017
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/1a32da2362b74d9ebfe2665c140b1245
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:1a32da2362b74d9ebfe2665c140b1245
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:1a32da2362b74d9ebfe2665c140b12452021-12-02T16:08:09ZWhat drives sound symbolism? Different acoustic cues underlie sound-size and sound-shape mappings10.1038/s41598-017-05965-y2045-2322https://doaj.org/article/1a32da2362b74d9ebfe2665c140b12452017-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05965-yhttps://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Sound symbolism refers to the non-arbitrary mappings that exist between phonetic properties of speech sounds and their meaning. Despite there being an extensive literature on the topic, the acoustic features and psychological mechanisms that give rise to sound symbolism are not, as yet, altogether clear. The present study was designed to investigate whether different sets of acoustic cues predict size and shape symbolism, respectively. In two experiments, participants judged whether a given consonant-vowel speech sound was large or small, round or angular, using a size or shape scale. Visual size judgments were predicted by vowel formant F1 in combination with F2, and by vowel duration. Visual shape judgments were, however, predicted by formants F2 and F3. Size and shape symbolism were thus not induced by a common mechanism, but rather were distinctly affected by acoustic properties of speech sounds. These findings portray sound symbolism as a process that is not based merely on broad categorical contrasts, such as round/unround and front/back vowels. Rather, individuals seem to base their sound-symbolic judgments on specific sets of acoustic cues, extracted from speech sounds, which vary across judgment dimensions.Klemens KnoeferleJixing LiEmanuela MaggioniCharles SpenceNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Klemens Knoeferle
Jixing Li
Emanuela Maggioni
Charles Spence
What drives sound symbolism? Different acoustic cues underlie sound-size and sound-shape mappings
description Abstract Sound symbolism refers to the non-arbitrary mappings that exist between phonetic properties of speech sounds and their meaning. Despite there being an extensive literature on the topic, the acoustic features and psychological mechanisms that give rise to sound symbolism are not, as yet, altogether clear. The present study was designed to investigate whether different sets of acoustic cues predict size and shape symbolism, respectively. In two experiments, participants judged whether a given consonant-vowel speech sound was large or small, round or angular, using a size or shape scale. Visual size judgments were predicted by vowel formant F1 in combination with F2, and by vowel duration. Visual shape judgments were, however, predicted by formants F2 and F3. Size and shape symbolism were thus not induced by a common mechanism, but rather were distinctly affected by acoustic properties of speech sounds. These findings portray sound symbolism as a process that is not based merely on broad categorical contrasts, such as round/unround and front/back vowels. Rather, individuals seem to base their sound-symbolic judgments on specific sets of acoustic cues, extracted from speech sounds, which vary across judgment dimensions.
format article
author Klemens Knoeferle
Jixing Li
Emanuela Maggioni
Charles Spence
author_facet Klemens Knoeferle
Jixing Li
Emanuela Maggioni
Charles Spence
author_sort Klemens Knoeferle
title What drives sound symbolism? Different acoustic cues underlie sound-size and sound-shape mappings
title_short What drives sound symbolism? Different acoustic cues underlie sound-size and sound-shape mappings
title_full What drives sound symbolism? Different acoustic cues underlie sound-size and sound-shape mappings
title_fullStr What drives sound symbolism? Different acoustic cues underlie sound-size and sound-shape mappings
title_full_unstemmed What drives sound symbolism? Different acoustic cues underlie sound-size and sound-shape mappings
title_sort what drives sound symbolism? different acoustic cues underlie sound-size and sound-shape mappings
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/1a32da2362b74d9ebfe2665c140b1245
work_keys_str_mv AT klemensknoeferle whatdrivessoundsymbolismdifferentacousticcuesunderliesoundsizeandsoundshapemappings
AT jixingli whatdrivessoundsymbolismdifferentacousticcuesunderliesoundsizeandsoundshapemappings
AT emanuelamaggioni whatdrivessoundsymbolismdifferentacousticcuesunderliesoundsizeandsoundshapemappings
AT charlesspence whatdrivessoundsymbolismdifferentacousticcuesunderliesoundsizeandsoundshapemappings
_version_ 1718384580004675584