Comparison of BISAP score with Ranson’s score in predicting severe acute pancreatitis
Objectives: To compare BISAP score with Ranson’s scoring in predicting severity of acute pancreatitis Methods: Extensive demographic, radiographic, and laboratory data from consecutive patients with AP admitted to our institution was collected between March 2014 to March 2015. Ranson’s and BISAP s...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Society of Surgeons of Nepal
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/1a5ff3d5a7964025a00b3c73a443a09b |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:1a5ff3d5a7964025a00b3c73a443a09b |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:1a5ff3d5a7964025a00b3c73a443a09b2021-12-05T19:16:34ZComparison of BISAP score with Ranson’s score in predicting severe acute pancreatitis10.3126/jssn.v18i3.153061815-39842392-4772https://doaj.org/article/1a5ff3d5a7964025a00b3c73a443a09b2016-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.nepjol.info/index.php/JSSN/article/view/15306https://doaj.org/toc/1815-3984https://doaj.org/toc/2392-4772 Objectives: To compare BISAP score with Ranson’s scoring in predicting severity of acute pancreatitis Methods: Extensive demographic, radiographic, and laboratory data from consecutive patients with AP admitted to our institution was collected between March 2014 to March 2015. Ranson’s and BISAP score was calculated. Severity of pancreatitis was defined according to Atlanta classification. Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV of both the scoring system was calculated and compared. Results: A total of 42 patients with diagnosis of acute pancreatitis were included during the study period. 21(50%) were male and 21(50%) were female. Mean age is 49.52 ± 17.37.Most common etiology was biliary (45%) followed by alcohol (31%). 20 (48%) patients were categorized as severe pancreatitis according to Atlanta classification. 21 (50%) patients had a Ranson’s score of ≥3 and 19 (45.24%) patients had a BISAP score of ≥3. Both Ranson’s and BISAP scoring system was statistically significant in determining SAP ( p-value = 0.002). Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of Ranson’s and BISAP score was calculated to be 75%, 72.72%, 71.43%, 76.19% and 70%, 77.27%, 73.68%, 73.91%. respectively. The AUC for SAP by Ranson’s score is 0.7386 ; 95%CI (0.602 - 0.874) and BISAP score is 0.7364 ; 95% CI ( 0.599 - 0.872). Conclusions: Both Ranson’s and BISAP scoring system is similar in predicting SAP. However BISAP has the advantage due to its simplicity. D KarkiT TamangD MaharjanP ThapaS ShresthaSociety of Surgeons of NepalarticleAcute PancreatitisSeverityBISAPRanson’s scoreSurgeryRD1-811ENJournal of Society of Surgeons of Nepal, Vol 18, Iss 3 (2016) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Acute Pancreatitis Severity BISAP Ranson’s score Surgery RD1-811 |
spellingShingle |
Acute Pancreatitis Severity BISAP Ranson’s score Surgery RD1-811 D Karki T Tamang D Maharjan P Thapa S Shrestha Comparison of BISAP score with Ranson’s score in predicting severe acute pancreatitis |
description |
Objectives: To compare BISAP score with Ranson’s scoring in predicting severity of acute pancreatitis
Methods: Extensive demographic, radiographic, and laboratory data from consecutive patients with AP admitted to our institution was collected between March 2014 to March 2015. Ranson’s and BISAP score was calculated. Severity of pancreatitis was defined according to Atlanta classification. Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV of both the scoring system was calculated and compared.
Results: A total of 42 patients with diagnosis of acute pancreatitis were included during the study period. 21(50%) were male and 21(50%) were female. Mean age is 49.52 ± 17.37.Most common etiology was biliary (45%) followed by alcohol (31%). 20 (48%) patients were categorized as severe pancreatitis according to Atlanta classification. 21 (50%) patients had a Ranson’s score of ≥3 and 19 (45.24%) patients had a BISAP score of ≥3. Both Ranson’s and BISAP scoring system was statistically significant in determining SAP ( p-value = 0.002). Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of Ranson’s and BISAP score was calculated to be 75%, 72.72%, 71.43%, 76.19% and 70%, 77.27%, 73.68%, 73.91%. respectively. The AUC for SAP by Ranson’s score is 0.7386 ; 95%CI (0.602 - 0.874) and BISAP score is 0.7364 ; 95% CI ( 0.599 - 0.872).
Conclusions: Both Ranson’s and BISAP scoring system is similar in predicting SAP. However BISAP has the advantage due to its simplicity.
|
format |
article |
author |
D Karki T Tamang D Maharjan P Thapa S Shrestha |
author_facet |
D Karki T Tamang D Maharjan P Thapa S Shrestha |
author_sort |
D Karki |
title |
Comparison of BISAP score with Ranson’s score in predicting severe acute pancreatitis |
title_short |
Comparison of BISAP score with Ranson’s score in predicting severe acute pancreatitis |
title_full |
Comparison of BISAP score with Ranson’s score in predicting severe acute pancreatitis |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of BISAP score with Ranson’s score in predicting severe acute pancreatitis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of BISAP score with Ranson’s score in predicting severe acute pancreatitis |
title_sort |
comparison of bisap score with ranson’s score in predicting severe acute pancreatitis |
publisher |
Society of Surgeons of Nepal |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/1a5ff3d5a7964025a00b3c73a443a09b |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT dkarki comparisonofbisapscorewithransonsscoreinpredictingsevereacutepancreatitis AT ttamang comparisonofbisapscorewithransonsscoreinpredictingsevereacutepancreatitis AT dmaharjan comparisonofbisapscorewithransonsscoreinpredictingsevereacutepancreatitis AT pthapa comparisonofbisapscorewithransonsscoreinpredictingsevereacutepancreatitis AT sshrestha comparisonofbisapscorewithransonsscoreinpredictingsevereacutepancreatitis |
_version_ |
1718371048529854464 |