Comparison of BISAP score with Ranson’s score in predicting severe acute pancreatitis

Objectives: To compare BISAP score with Ranson’s scoring in predicting severity of acute pancreatitis Methods: Extensive demographic, radiographic, and laboratory data from consecutive patients with AP admitted to our institution was collected between March 2014 to March 2015. Ranson’s and BISAP s...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: D Karki, T Tamang, D Maharjan, P Thapa, S Shrestha
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Society of Surgeons of Nepal 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/1a5ff3d5a7964025a00b3c73a443a09b
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:1a5ff3d5a7964025a00b3c73a443a09b
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:1a5ff3d5a7964025a00b3c73a443a09b2021-12-05T19:16:34ZComparison of BISAP score with Ranson’s score in predicting severe acute pancreatitis10.3126/jssn.v18i3.153061815-39842392-4772https://doaj.org/article/1a5ff3d5a7964025a00b3c73a443a09b2016-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.nepjol.info/index.php/JSSN/article/view/15306https://doaj.org/toc/1815-3984https://doaj.org/toc/2392-4772 Objectives: To compare BISAP score with Ranson’s scoring in predicting severity of acute pancreatitis Methods: Extensive demographic, radiographic, and laboratory data from consecutive patients with AP admitted to our institution was collected between March 2014 to March 2015. Ranson’s and BISAP score was calculated. Severity of pancreatitis was defined according to Atlanta classification. Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV of both the scoring system was calculated and compared. Results: A total of 42 patients with diagnosis of acute pancreatitis were included during the study period. 21(50%) were male and 21(50%) were female. Mean age is 49.52 ± 17.37.Most common etiology was biliary (45%) followed by alcohol (31%). 20 (48%) patients were categorized as severe pancreatitis according to Atlanta classification. 21 (50%) patients had a Ranson’s score of ≥3 and 19 (45.24%) patients had a BISAP score of ≥3. Both Ranson’s and BISAP scoring system was statistically significant in determining SAP ( p-value = 0.002). Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of Ranson’s and BISAP score was calculated to be 75%, 72.72%, 71.43%, 76.19% and 70%, 77.27%, 73.68%, 73.91%. respectively. The AUC for SAP by Ranson’s score is 0.7386 ; 95%CI (0.602 - 0.874) and BISAP score is 0.7364 ; 95% CI ( 0.599 - 0.872). Conclusions: Both Ranson’s and BISAP scoring system is similar in predicting SAP. However BISAP has the advantage due to its simplicity. D KarkiT TamangD MaharjanP ThapaS ShresthaSociety of Surgeons of NepalarticleAcute PancreatitisSeverityBISAPRanson’s scoreSurgeryRD1-811ENJournal of Society of Surgeons of Nepal, Vol 18, Iss 3 (2016)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Acute Pancreatitis
Severity
BISAP
Ranson’s score
Surgery
RD1-811
spellingShingle Acute Pancreatitis
Severity
BISAP
Ranson’s score
Surgery
RD1-811
D Karki
T Tamang
D Maharjan
P Thapa
S Shrestha
Comparison of BISAP score with Ranson’s score in predicting severe acute pancreatitis
description Objectives: To compare BISAP score with Ranson’s scoring in predicting severity of acute pancreatitis Methods: Extensive demographic, radiographic, and laboratory data from consecutive patients with AP admitted to our institution was collected between March 2014 to March 2015. Ranson’s and BISAP score was calculated. Severity of pancreatitis was defined according to Atlanta classification. Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV of both the scoring system was calculated and compared. Results: A total of 42 patients with diagnosis of acute pancreatitis were included during the study period. 21(50%) were male and 21(50%) were female. Mean age is 49.52 ± 17.37.Most common etiology was biliary (45%) followed by alcohol (31%). 20 (48%) patients were categorized as severe pancreatitis according to Atlanta classification. 21 (50%) patients had a Ranson’s score of ≥3 and 19 (45.24%) patients had a BISAP score of ≥3. Both Ranson’s and BISAP scoring system was statistically significant in determining SAP ( p-value = 0.002). Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of Ranson’s and BISAP score was calculated to be 75%, 72.72%, 71.43%, 76.19% and 70%, 77.27%, 73.68%, 73.91%. respectively. The AUC for SAP by Ranson’s score is 0.7386 ; 95%CI (0.602 - 0.874) and BISAP score is 0.7364 ; 95% CI ( 0.599 - 0.872). Conclusions: Both Ranson’s and BISAP scoring system is similar in predicting SAP. However BISAP has the advantage due to its simplicity.
format article
author D Karki
T Tamang
D Maharjan
P Thapa
S Shrestha
author_facet D Karki
T Tamang
D Maharjan
P Thapa
S Shrestha
author_sort D Karki
title Comparison of BISAP score with Ranson’s score in predicting severe acute pancreatitis
title_short Comparison of BISAP score with Ranson’s score in predicting severe acute pancreatitis
title_full Comparison of BISAP score with Ranson’s score in predicting severe acute pancreatitis
title_fullStr Comparison of BISAP score with Ranson’s score in predicting severe acute pancreatitis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of BISAP score with Ranson’s score in predicting severe acute pancreatitis
title_sort comparison of bisap score with ranson’s score in predicting severe acute pancreatitis
publisher Society of Surgeons of Nepal
publishDate 2016
url https://doaj.org/article/1a5ff3d5a7964025a00b3c73a443a09b
work_keys_str_mv AT dkarki comparisonofbisapscorewithransonsscoreinpredictingsevereacutepancreatitis
AT ttamang comparisonofbisapscorewithransonsscoreinpredictingsevereacutepancreatitis
AT dmaharjan comparisonofbisapscorewithransonsscoreinpredictingsevereacutepancreatitis
AT pthapa comparisonofbisapscorewithransonsscoreinpredictingsevereacutepancreatitis
AT sshrestha comparisonofbisapscorewithransonsscoreinpredictingsevereacutepancreatitis
_version_ 1718371048529854464