COVID 19 scoping: A systemic review and meta-analysis
Introduction: The world has faced the pandemic of COVID-19 in the march of 2020 and still it continues to effect in 2021. Hence, in the present study we aim to evaluate the gulps in the research so that certain recommendations can be made for the future research. We conducted a scoping review of the...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/1a87838fad3c403da946390d0482a99b |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:1a87838fad3c403da946390d0482a99b |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:1a87838fad3c403da946390d0482a99b2021-11-19T12:15:51ZCOVID 19 scoping: A systemic review and meta-analysis0975-740610.4103/jpbs.jpbs_387_21https://doaj.org/article/1a87838fad3c403da946390d0482a99b2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2021;volume=13;issue=6;spage=938;epage=942;aulast=Dewanhttps://doaj.org/toc/0975-7406Introduction: The world has faced the pandemic of COVID-19 in the march of 2020 and still it continues to effect in 2021. Hence, in the present study we aim to evaluate the gulps in the research so that certain recommendations can be made for the future research. We conducted a scoping review of the COVID meta-analysis. Materials and Methods: Online data was collected from the search engines of EBSCO, PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus. The searched terms were COVID-19, CORONA, SARS-CoV-2, clinical features, Wuhan, etc. The study articles were collected that from January 2020 to February 2021. Based on the PRISMA guidelines, the meta-analysis was performed. Results: In the present study, we finalized 316 articles. On February 2020, the first article was published. We observed a spike in the meta-analysis later on. Most of the meta-analysis were issued in the virology and infection magazines. As expected, the majority studies were from Wuhan. The other countries that published the meta-analysis were the USA, the UK, and Italy. The studies included in each meta-analysis were nearly 25 and the subjects were approximately 16 thousand. However, we noticed a poor quality in majority of these meta-analysis and <10% of all the meta-analysis showed higher confidence. Conclusion: A poor quality of the meta-analysis has predominated the data and very few are of high quality. All the journal editors and the reviewing team should verify and thoroughly organize the protocol so that only high quality meta-analysis are encouraged.Harisha DewanMohammed NishanShan SainudeenSanskritiKunal JhaAshish MahobiaRahul V C TiwariWolters Kluwer Medknow Publicationsarticlecovid-19scopesystemic review and meta-analysisPharmacy and materia medicaRS1-441Analytical chemistryQD71-142ENJournal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences, Vol 13, Iss 6, Pp 938-942 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
covid-19 scope systemic review and meta-analysis Pharmacy and materia medica RS1-441 Analytical chemistry QD71-142 |
spellingShingle |
covid-19 scope systemic review and meta-analysis Pharmacy and materia medica RS1-441 Analytical chemistry QD71-142 Harisha Dewan Mohammed Nishan Shan Sainudeen Sanskriti Kunal Jha Ashish Mahobia Rahul V C Tiwari COVID 19 scoping: A systemic review and meta-analysis |
description |
Introduction: The world has faced the pandemic of COVID-19 in the march of 2020 and still it continues to effect in 2021. Hence, in the present study we aim to evaluate the gulps in the research so that certain recommendations can be made for the future research. We conducted a scoping review of the COVID meta-analysis. Materials and Methods: Online data was collected from the search engines of EBSCO, PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus. The searched terms were COVID-19, CORONA, SARS-CoV-2, clinical features, Wuhan, etc. The study articles were collected that from January 2020 to February 2021. Based on the PRISMA guidelines, the meta-analysis was performed. Results: In the present study, we finalized 316 articles. On February 2020, the first article was published. We observed a spike in the meta-analysis later on. Most of the meta-analysis were issued in the virology and infection magazines. As expected, the majority studies were from Wuhan. The other countries that published the meta-analysis were the USA, the UK, and Italy. The studies included in each meta-analysis were nearly 25 and the subjects were approximately 16 thousand. However, we noticed a poor quality in majority of these meta-analysis and <10% of all the meta-analysis showed higher confidence. Conclusion: A poor quality of the meta-analysis has predominated the data and very few are of high quality. All the journal editors and the reviewing team should verify and thoroughly organize the protocol so that only high quality meta-analysis are encouraged. |
format |
article |
author |
Harisha Dewan Mohammed Nishan Shan Sainudeen Sanskriti Kunal Jha Ashish Mahobia Rahul V C Tiwari |
author_facet |
Harisha Dewan Mohammed Nishan Shan Sainudeen Sanskriti Kunal Jha Ashish Mahobia Rahul V C Tiwari |
author_sort |
Harisha Dewan |
title |
COVID 19 scoping: A systemic review and meta-analysis |
title_short |
COVID 19 scoping: A systemic review and meta-analysis |
title_full |
COVID 19 scoping: A systemic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr |
COVID 19 scoping: A systemic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
COVID 19 scoping: A systemic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort |
covid 19 scoping: a systemic review and meta-analysis |
publisher |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/1a87838fad3c403da946390d0482a99b |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT harishadewan covid19scopingasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mohammednishan covid19scopingasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis AT shansainudeen covid19scopingasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis AT sanskriti covid19scopingasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kunaljha covid19scopingasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ashishmahobia covid19scopingasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis AT rahulvctiwari covid19scopingasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis |
_version_ |
1718420116693057536 |