COVID 19 scoping: A systemic review and meta-analysis

Introduction: The world has faced the pandemic of COVID-19 in the march of 2020 and still it continues to effect in 2021. Hence, in the present study we aim to evaluate the gulps in the research so that certain recommendations can be made for the future research. We conducted a scoping review of the...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harisha Dewan, Mohammed Nishan, Shan Sainudeen, Sanskriti, Kunal Jha, Ashish Mahobia, Rahul V C Tiwari
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/1a87838fad3c403da946390d0482a99b
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:1a87838fad3c403da946390d0482a99b
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:1a87838fad3c403da946390d0482a99b2021-11-19T12:15:51ZCOVID 19 scoping: A systemic review and meta-analysis0975-740610.4103/jpbs.jpbs_387_21https://doaj.org/article/1a87838fad3c403da946390d0482a99b2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2021;volume=13;issue=6;spage=938;epage=942;aulast=Dewanhttps://doaj.org/toc/0975-7406Introduction: The world has faced the pandemic of COVID-19 in the march of 2020 and still it continues to effect in 2021. Hence, in the present study we aim to evaluate the gulps in the research so that certain recommendations can be made for the future research. We conducted a scoping review of the COVID meta-analysis. Materials and Methods: Online data was collected from the search engines of EBSCO, PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus. The searched terms were COVID-19, CORONA, SARS-CoV-2, clinical features, Wuhan, etc. The study articles were collected that from January 2020 to February 2021. Based on the PRISMA guidelines, the meta-analysis was performed. Results: In the present study, we finalized 316 articles. On February 2020, the first article was published. We observed a spike in the meta-analysis later on. Most of the meta-analysis were issued in the virology and infection magazines. As expected, the majority studies were from Wuhan. The other countries that published the meta-analysis were the USA, the UK, and Italy. The studies included in each meta-analysis were nearly 25 and the subjects were approximately 16 thousand. However, we noticed a poor quality in majority of these meta-analysis and <10% of all the meta-analysis showed higher confidence. Conclusion: A poor quality of the meta-analysis has predominated the data and very few are of high quality. All the journal editors and the reviewing team should verify and thoroughly organize the protocol so that only high quality meta-analysis are encouraged.Harisha DewanMohammed NishanShan SainudeenSanskritiKunal JhaAshish MahobiaRahul V C TiwariWolters Kluwer Medknow Publicationsarticlecovid-19scopesystemic review and meta-analysisPharmacy and materia medicaRS1-441Analytical chemistryQD71-142ENJournal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences, Vol 13, Iss 6, Pp 938-942 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic covid-19
scope
systemic review and meta-analysis
Pharmacy and materia medica
RS1-441
Analytical chemistry
QD71-142
spellingShingle covid-19
scope
systemic review and meta-analysis
Pharmacy and materia medica
RS1-441
Analytical chemistry
QD71-142
Harisha Dewan
Mohammed Nishan
Shan Sainudeen
Sanskriti
Kunal Jha
Ashish Mahobia
Rahul V C Tiwari
COVID 19 scoping: A systemic review and meta-analysis
description Introduction: The world has faced the pandemic of COVID-19 in the march of 2020 and still it continues to effect in 2021. Hence, in the present study we aim to evaluate the gulps in the research so that certain recommendations can be made for the future research. We conducted a scoping review of the COVID meta-analysis. Materials and Methods: Online data was collected from the search engines of EBSCO, PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus. The searched terms were COVID-19, CORONA, SARS-CoV-2, clinical features, Wuhan, etc. The study articles were collected that from January 2020 to February 2021. Based on the PRISMA guidelines, the meta-analysis was performed. Results: In the present study, we finalized 316 articles. On February 2020, the first article was published. We observed a spike in the meta-analysis later on. Most of the meta-analysis were issued in the virology and infection magazines. As expected, the majority studies were from Wuhan. The other countries that published the meta-analysis were the USA, the UK, and Italy. The studies included in each meta-analysis were nearly 25 and the subjects were approximately 16 thousand. However, we noticed a poor quality in majority of these meta-analysis and <10% of all the meta-analysis showed higher confidence. Conclusion: A poor quality of the meta-analysis has predominated the data and very few are of high quality. All the journal editors and the reviewing team should verify and thoroughly organize the protocol so that only high quality meta-analysis are encouraged.
format article
author Harisha Dewan
Mohammed Nishan
Shan Sainudeen
Sanskriti
Kunal Jha
Ashish Mahobia
Rahul V C Tiwari
author_facet Harisha Dewan
Mohammed Nishan
Shan Sainudeen
Sanskriti
Kunal Jha
Ashish Mahobia
Rahul V C Tiwari
author_sort Harisha Dewan
title COVID 19 scoping: A systemic review and meta-analysis
title_short COVID 19 scoping: A systemic review and meta-analysis
title_full COVID 19 scoping: A systemic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr COVID 19 scoping: A systemic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed COVID 19 scoping: A systemic review and meta-analysis
title_sort covid 19 scoping: a systemic review and meta-analysis
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/1a87838fad3c403da946390d0482a99b
work_keys_str_mv AT harishadewan covid19scopingasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mohammednishan covid19scopingasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shansainudeen covid19scopingasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sanskriti covid19scopingasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kunaljha covid19scopingasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ashishmahobia covid19scopingasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT rahulvctiwari covid19scopingasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis
_version_ 1718420116693057536