Resting heart rate variability predicts safety learning and fear extinction in an interoceptive fear conditioning paradigm.

This study aimed to investigate whether interindividual differences in autonomic inhibitory control predict safety learning and fear extinction in an interoceptive fear conditioning paradigm. Data from a previously reported study (N = 40) were extended (N = 17) and re-analyzed to test whether health...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meike Pappens, Mathias Schroijen, Stefan Sütterlin, Elyn Smets, Omer Van den Bergh, Julian F Thayer, Ilse Van Diest
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/1ab5a6ef64ac498a8376dc399b9091a4
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:1ab5a6ef64ac498a8376dc399b9091a4
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:1ab5a6ef64ac498a8376dc399b9091a42021-11-25T06:02:11ZResting heart rate variability predicts safety learning and fear extinction in an interoceptive fear conditioning paradigm.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0105054https://doaj.org/article/1ab5a6ef64ac498a8376dc399b9091a42014-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/25181542/pdf/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203This study aimed to investigate whether interindividual differences in autonomic inhibitory control predict safety learning and fear extinction in an interoceptive fear conditioning paradigm. Data from a previously reported study (N = 40) were extended (N = 17) and re-analyzed to test whether healthy participants' resting heart rate variability (HRV) - a proxy of cardiac vagal tone - predicts learning performance. The conditioned stimulus (CS) was a slight sensation of breathlessness induced by a flow resistor, the unconditioned stimulus (US) was an aversive short-lasting suffocation experience induced by a complete occlusion of the breathing circuitry. During acquisition, the paired group received 6 paired CS-US presentations; the control group received 6 explicitly unpaired CS-US presentations. In the extinction phase, both groups were exposed to 6 CS-only presentations. Measures included startle blink EMG, skin conductance responses (SCR) and US-expectancy ratings. Resting HRV significantly predicted the startle blink EMG learning curves both during acquisition and extinction. In the unpaired group, higher levels of HRV at rest predicted safety learning to the CS during acquisition. In the paired group, higher levels of HRV were associated with better extinction. Our findings suggest that the strength or integrity of prefrontal inhibitory mechanisms involved in safety- and extinction learning can be indexed by HRV at rest.Meike PappensMathias SchroijenStefan SütterlinElyn SmetsOmer Van den BerghJulian F ThayerIlse Van DiestPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 9, Iss 9, p e105054 (2014)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Meike Pappens
Mathias Schroijen
Stefan Sütterlin
Elyn Smets
Omer Van den Bergh
Julian F Thayer
Ilse Van Diest
Resting heart rate variability predicts safety learning and fear extinction in an interoceptive fear conditioning paradigm.
description This study aimed to investigate whether interindividual differences in autonomic inhibitory control predict safety learning and fear extinction in an interoceptive fear conditioning paradigm. Data from a previously reported study (N = 40) were extended (N = 17) and re-analyzed to test whether healthy participants' resting heart rate variability (HRV) - a proxy of cardiac vagal tone - predicts learning performance. The conditioned stimulus (CS) was a slight sensation of breathlessness induced by a flow resistor, the unconditioned stimulus (US) was an aversive short-lasting suffocation experience induced by a complete occlusion of the breathing circuitry. During acquisition, the paired group received 6 paired CS-US presentations; the control group received 6 explicitly unpaired CS-US presentations. In the extinction phase, both groups were exposed to 6 CS-only presentations. Measures included startle blink EMG, skin conductance responses (SCR) and US-expectancy ratings. Resting HRV significantly predicted the startle blink EMG learning curves both during acquisition and extinction. In the unpaired group, higher levels of HRV at rest predicted safety learning to the CS during acquisition. In the paired group, higher levels of HRV were associated with better extinction. Our findings suggest that the strength or integrity of prefrontal inhibitory mechanisms involved in safety- and extinction learning can be indexed by HRV at rest.
format article
author Meike Pappens
Mathias Schroijen
Stefan Sütterlin
Elyn Smets
Omer Van den Bergh
Julian F Thayer
Ilse Van Diest
author_facet Meike Pappens
Mathias Schroijen
Stefan Sütterlin
Elyn Smets
Omer Van den Bergh
Julian F Thayer
Ilse Van Diest
author_sort Meike Pappens
title Resting heart rate variability predicts safety learning and fear extinction in an interoceptive fear conditioning paradigm.
title_short Resting heart rate variability predicts safety learning and fear extinction in an interoceptive fear conditioning paradigm.
title_full Resting heart rate variability predicts safety learning and fear extinction in an interoceptive fear conditioning paradigm.
title_fullStr Resting heart rate variability predicts safety learning and fear extinction in an interoceptive fear conditioning paradigm.
title_full_unstemmed Resting heart rate variability predicts safety learning and fear extinction in an interoceptive fear conditioning paradigm.
title_sort resting heart rate variability predicts safety learning and fear extinction in an interoceptive fear conditioning paradigm.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2014
url https://doaj.org/article/1ab5a6ef64ac498a8376dc399b9091a4
work_keys_str_mv AT meikepappens restingheartratevariabilitypredictssafetylearningandfearextinctioninaninteroceptivefearconditioningparadigm
AT mathiasschroijen restingheartratevariabilitypredictssafetylearningandfearextinctioninaninteroceptivefearconditioningparadigm
AT stefansutterlin restingheartratevariabilitypredictssafetylearningandfearextinctioninaninteroceptivefearconditioningparadigm
AT elynsmets restingheartratevariabilitypredictssafetylearningandfearextinctioninaninteroceptivefearconditioningparadigm
AT omervandenbergh restingheartratevariabilitypredictssafetylearningandfearextinctioninaninteroceptivefearconditioningparadigm
AT julianfthayer restingheartratevariabilitypredictssafetylearningandfearextinctioninaninteroceptivefearconditioningparadigm
AT ilsevandiest restingheartratevariabilitypredictssafetylearningandfearextinctioninaninteroceptivefearconditioningparadigm
_version_ 1718414265424019456