The value of long-term citizen science data for monitoring koala populations

Abstract The active collection of wildlife sighting data by trained observers is expensive, restricted to small geographical areas and conducted infrequently. Reporting of wildlife sightings by members of the public provides an opportunity to collect wildlife data continuously over wider geographica...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ravi Bandara Dissanayake, Mark Stevenson, Rachel Allavena, Joerg Henning
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2019
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/1ae9cadecfc14ebd9de52b7cc0d206c7
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:1ae9cadecfc14ebd9de52b7cc0d206c7
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:1ae9cadecfc14ebd9de52b7cc0d206c72021-12-02T15:09:53ZThe value of long-term citizen science data for monitoring koala populations10.1038/s41598-019-46376-52045-2322https://doaj.org/article/1ae9cadecfc14ebd9de52b7cc0d206c72019-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46376-5https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract The active collection of wildlife sighting data by trained observers is expensive, restricted to small geographical areas and conducted infrequently. Reporting of wildlife sightings by members of the public provides an opportunity to collect wildlife data continuously over wider geographical areas, at lower cost. We used individual koala sightings reported by members of the public between 1997 and 2013 in South-East Queensland, Australia (n = 14,076 koala sightings) to describe spatial and temporal trends in koala presence, to estimate koala sighting density and to identify biases associated with sightings. Temporal trends in sightings mirrored the breeding season of koalas. Sightings were high in residential areas (63%), followed by agricultural (15%), and parkland (12%). The study area was divided into 57,780 one-square kilometer grid cells and grid cells with no sightings of koalas decreased over time (from 35% to 21%) indicative of a greater level of spatial overlap of koala home ranges and human activity areas over time. The density of reported koala sightings decreased as distance from primary and secondary roads increased, indicative of a higher search effort near roads. Our results show that koala sighting data can be used to refine koala distribution and population estimates derived from active surveying, on the condition that appropriate bias correction techniques are applied. Collecting koala absence and search effort information and conducting repeated searches for koalas in the same areas are useful approaches to improve the quality of sighting data in citizen science programs.Ravi Bandara DissanayakeMark StevensonRachel AllavenaJoerg HenningNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 9, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2019)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Ravi Bandara Dissanayake
Mark Stevenson
Rachel Allavena
Joerg Henning
The value of long-term citizen science data for monitoring koala populations
description Abstract The active collection of wildlife sighting data by trained observers is expensive, restricted to small geographical areas and conducted infrequently. Reporting of wildlife sightings by members of the public provides an opportunity to collect wildlife data continuously over wider geographical areas, at lower cost. We used individual koala sightings reported by members of the public between 1997 and 2013 in South-East Queensland, Australia (n = 14,076 koala sightings) to describe spatial and temporal trends in koala presence, to estimate koala sighting density and to identify biases associated with sightings. Temporal trends in sightings mirrored the breeding season of koalas. Sightings were high in residential areas (63%), followed by agricultural (15%), and parkland (12%). The study area was divided into 57,780 one-square kilometer grid cells and grid cells with no sightings of koalas decreased over time (from 35% to 21%) indicative of a greater level of spatial overlap of koala home ranges and human activity areas over time. The density of reported koala sightings decreased as distance from primary and secondary roads increased, indicative of a higher search effort near roads. Our results show that koala sighting data can be used to refine koala distribution and population estimates derived from active surveying, on the condition that appropriate bias correction techniques are applied. Collecting koala absence and search effort information and conducting repeated searches for koalas in the same areas are useful approaches to improve the quality of sighting data in citizen science programs.
format article
author Ravi Bandara Dissanayake
Mark Stevenson
Rachel Allavena
Joerg Henning
author_facet Ravi Bandara Dissanayake
Mark Stevenson
Rachel Allavena
Joerg Henning
author_sort Ravi Bandara Dissanayake
title The value of long-term citizen science data for monitoring koala populations
title_short The value of long-term citizen science data for monitoring koala populations
title_full The value of long-term citizen science data for monitoring koala populations
title_fullStr The value of long-term citizen science data for monitoring koala populations
title_full_unstemmed The value of long-term citizen science data for monitoring koala populations
title_sort value of long-term citizen science data for monitoring koala populations
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2019
url https://doaj.org/article/1ae9cadecfc14ebd9de52b7cc0d206c7
work_keys_str_mv AT ravibandaradissanayake thevalueoflongtermcitizensciencedataformonitoringkoalapopulations
AT markstevenson thevalueoflongtermcitizensciencedataformonitoringkoalapopulations
AT rachelallavena thevalueoflongtermcitizensciencedataformonitoringkoalapopulations
AT joerghenning thevalueoflongtermcitizensciencedataformonitoringkoalapopulations
AT ravibandaradissanayake valueoflongtermcitizensciencedataformonitoringkoalapopulations
AT markstevenson valueoflongtermcitizensciencedataformonitoringkoalapopulations
AT rachelallavena valueoflongtermcitizensciencedataformonitoringkoalapopulations
AT joerghenning valueoflongtermcitizensciencedataformonitoringkoalapopulations
_version_ 1718387737443172352