Efficacy and Safety of Etanercept Biosimilars Compared With the Originator for Treatment of Juvenile Arthritis: A Prospective Observational Study

Objective Analysis of etanercept biosimilars in pediatric patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) in comparison with the etanercept originator in terms of efficacy and safety. Methods Patients diagnosed with JIA who started treatment with either the etanercept originator or a biosimilar af...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Franz Thiele, Ariane Klein, Anton Hospach, Daniel Windschall, Sonja Mrusek, J. Michael Ruehlmann, Gerd Horneff
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Wiley 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/1b438a336af34b0da53e55d8912c6ed0
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:1b438a336af34b0da53e55d8912c6ed0
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:1b438a336af34b0da53e55d8912c6ed02021-11-16T09:54:20ZEfficacy and Safety of Etanercept Biosimilars Compared With the Originator for Treatment of Juvenile Arthritis: A Prospective Observational Study2578-574510.1002/acr2.11325https://doaj.org/article/1b438a336af34b0da53e55d8912c6ed02021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11325https://doaj.org/toc/2578-5745Objective Analysis of etanercept biosimilars in pediatric patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) in comparison with the etanercept originator in terms of efficacy and safety. Methods Patients diagnosed with JIA who started treatment with either the etanercept originator or a biosimilar after January 1, 2017, were selected from the German BIKER registry (Biologics in Paediatric Rheumatology Registry). Furthermore, patients who started therapy with the originator and switched to a biosimilar during the course of therapy were identified. For both patient groups, disease activity and safety were examined and compared separately. Results After January 1, 2017, 348 patients started treatment with the etanercept originator (n = 293) or a biosimilar (n = 55). Another 57 patients switched to a biosimilar during the course of therapy. A significant decrease or a stable remission of disease activity was observed in both patient groups. The safety profiles were comparable, and frequencies and types of adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs were similar in patients starting therapy with the originator or a biosimilar. Only injection site reactions occurred slightly more frequently under biosimilar therapy, without having an impact on therapy adherence. In patients who switched therapy, the AE rate per 100 patient‐years was comparable before (26.4) and after (32.1) the switch. Conclusion In patients with JIA who require treatment with etanercept, the originator is still used much more frequently. However, our study highlights the equivalence of etanercept biosimilars for therapy for JIA. Increased use of these biosimilars in pediatric patients can therefore be recommended without hesitation.Franz ThieleAriane KleinAnton HospachDaniel WindschallSonja MrusekJ. Michael RuehlmannGerd HorneffWileyarticleDiseases of the musculoskeletal systemRC925-935ENACR Open Rheumatology, Vol 3, Iss 11, Pp 779-787 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Diseases of the musculoskeletal system
RC925-935
spellingShingle Diseases of the musculoskeletal system
RC925-935
Franz Thiele
Ariane Klein
Anton Hospach
Daniel Windschall
Sonja Mrusek
J. Michael Ruehlmann
Gerd Horneff
Efficacy and Safety of Etanercept Biosimilars Compared With the Originator for Treatment of Juvenile Arthritis: A Prospective Observational Study
description Objective Analysis of etanercept biosimilars in pediatric patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) in comparison with the etanercept originator in terms of efficacy and safety. Methods Patients diagnosed with JIA who started treatment with either the etanercept originator or a biosimilar after January 1, 2017, were selected from the German BIKER registry (Biologics in Paediatric Rheumatology Registry). Furthermore, patients who started therapy with the originator and switched to a biosimilar during the course of therapy were identified. For both patient groups, disease activity and safety were examined and compared separately. Results After January 1, 2017, 348 patients started treatment with the etanercept originator (n = 293) or a biosimilar (n = 55). Another 57 patients switched to a biosimilar during the course of therapy. A significant decrease or a stable remission of disease activity was observed in both patient groups. The safety profiles were comparable, and frequencies and types of adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs were similar in patients starting therapy with the originator or a biosimilar. Only injection site reactions occurred slightly more frequently under biosimilar therapy, without having an impact on therapy adherence. In patients who switched therapy, the AE rate per 100 patient‐years was comparable before (26.4) and after (32.1) the switch. Conclusion In patients with JIA who require treatment with etanercept, the originator is still used much more frequently. However, our study highlights the equivalence of etanercept biosimilars for therapy for JIA. Increased use of these biosimilars in pediatric patients can therefore be recommended without hesitation.
format article
author Franz Thiele
Ariane Klein
Anton Hospach
Daniel Windschall
Sonja Mrusek
J. Michael Ruehlmann
Gerd Horneff
author_facet Franz Thiele
Ariane Klein
Anton Hospach
Daniel Windschall
Sonja Mrusek
J. Michael Ruehlmann
Gerd Horneff
author_sort Franz Thiele
title Efficacy and Safety of Etanercept Biosimilars Compared With the Originator for Treatment of Juvenile Arthritis: A Prospective Observational Study
title_short Efficacy and Safety of Etanercept Biosimilars Compared With the Originator for Treatment of Juvenile Arthritis: A Prospective Observational Study
title_full Efficacy and Safety of Etanercept Biosimilars Compared With the Originator for Treatment of Juvenile Arthritis: A Prospective Observational Study
title_fullStr Efficacy and Safety of Etanercept Biosimilars Compared With the Originator for Treatment of Juvenile Arthritis: A Prospective Observational Study
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and Safety of Etanercept Biosimilars Compared With the Originator for Treatment of Juvenile Arthritis: A Prospective Observational Study
title_sort efficacy and safety of etanercept biosimilars compared with the originator for treatment of juvenile arthritis: a prospective observational study
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/1b438a336af34b0da53e55d8912c6ed0
work_keys_str_mv AT franzthiele efficacyandsafetyofetanerceptbiosimilarscomparedwiththeoriginatorfortreatmentofjuvenilearthritisaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT arianeklein efficacyandsafetyofetanerceptbiosimilarscomparedwiththeoriginatorfortreatmentofjuvenilearthritisaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT antonhospach efficacyandsafetyofetanerceptbiosimilarscomparedwiththeoriginatorfortreatmentofjuvenilearthritisaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT danielwindschall efficacyandsafetyofetanerceptbiosimilarscomparedwiththeoriginatorfortreatmentofjuvenilearthritisaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT sonjamrusek efficacyandsafetyofetanerceptbiosimilarscomparedwiththeoriginatorfortreatmentofjuvenilearthritisaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT jmichaelruehlmann efficacyandsafetyofetanerceptbiosimilarscomparedwiththeoriginatorfortreatmentofjuvenilearthritisaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT gerdhorneff efficacyandsafetyofetanerceptbiosimilarscomparedwiththeoriginatorfortreatmentofjuvenilearthritisaprospectiveobservationalstudy
_version_ 1718426590559338496