Laboratory methods to decipher epigenetic signatures: a comparative review

Abstract Epigenetics refers to nucleotide sequence-independent events, and heritable changes, including DNA methylation and histone modification (as the two main processes), contributing to the phenotypic features of the cell. Both genetics and epigenetics contribute to determining the outcome of re...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Raheleh Halabian, Valizadeh Arshad, Ali Ahmadi, Pardis Saeedi, Sadegh Azimzadeh Jamalkandi, Mohammad Reza Alivand
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: BMC 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/1b4cf8f29a574343ac6f6dd38dae2d49
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:1b4cf8f29a574343ac6f6dd38dae2d49
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:1b4cf8f29a574343ac6f6dd38dae2d492021-11-14T12:10:12ZLaboratory methods to decipher epigenetic signatures: a comparative review10.1186/s11658-021-00290-91425-81531689-1392https://doaj.org/article/1b4cf8f29a574343ac6f6dd38dae2d492021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s11658-021-00290-9https://doaj.org/toc/1425-8153https://doaj.org/toc/1689-1392Abstract Epigenetics refers to nucleotide sequence-independent events, and heritable changes, including DNA methylation and histone modification (as the two main processes), contributing to the phenotypic features of the cell. Both genetics and epigenetics contribute to determining the outcome of regulatory gene expression systems. Indeed, the flexibility of epigenetic effects and stability of genetic coding lead to gene regulation complexity in response signals. Since some epigenetic changes are significant in abnormalities such as cancers and neurodegenerative diseases, the initial changes, dynamic and reversible properties, and diagnostic potential of epigenomic phenomena are subject to epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) for therapeutic aims. Based on recent studies, methodological developments are necessary to improve epigenetic research. As a result, several methods have been developed to explore epigenetic alterations at low, medium, and high scales, focusing on DNA methylation and histone modification detection. In this research field, bisulfite-, enzyme sensitivity- and antibody specificity-based techniques are used for DNA methylation, whereas histone modifications are gained based on antibody recognition. This review provides a mechanism-based understanding and comparative overview of the most common techniques for detecting the status of epigenetic effects, including DNA methylation and histone modifications, for applicable approaches from low- to high-throughput scales.Raheleh HalabianValizadeh ArshadAli AhmadiPardis SaeediSadegh Azimzadeh JamalkandiMohammad Reza AlivandBMCarticleEpigeneticsDNA methylationHistone modificationsTechniquesCytologyQH573-671ENCellular & Molecular Biology Letters, Vol 26, Iss 1, Pp 1-30 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Epigenetics
DNA methylation
Histone modifications
Techniques
Cytology
QH573-671
spellingShingle Epigenetics
DNA methylation
Histone modifications
Techniques
Cytology
QH573-671
Raheleh Halabian
Valizadeh Arshad
Ali Ahmadi
Pardis Saeedi
Sadegh Azimzadeh Jamalkandi
Mohammad Reza Alivand
Laboratory methods to decipher epigenetic signatures: a comparative review
description Abstract Epigenetics refers to nucleotide sequence-independent events, and heritable changes, including DNA methylation and histone modification (as the two main processes), contributing to the phenotypic features of the cell. Both genetics and epigenetics contribute to determining the outcome of regulatory gene expression systems. Indeed, the flexibility of epigenetic effects and stability of genetic coding lead to gene regulation complexity in response signals. Since some epigenetic changes are significant in abnormalities such as cancers and neurodegenerative diseases, the initial changes, dynamic and reversible properties, and diagnostic potential of epigenomic phenomena are subject to epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) for therapeutic aims. Based on recent studies, methodological developments are necessary to improve epigenetic research. As a result, several methods have been developed to explore epigenetic alterations at low, medium, and high scales, focusing on DNA methylation and histone modification detection. In this research field, bisulfite-, enzyme sensitivity- and antibody specificity-based techniques are used for DNA methylation, whereas histone modifications are gained based on antibody recognition. This review provides a mechanism-based understanding and comparative overview of the most common techniques for detecting the status of epigenetic effects, including DNA methylation and histone modifications, for applicable approaches from low- to high-throughput scales.
format article
author Raheleh Halabian
Valizadeh Arshad
Ali Ahmadi
Pardis Saeedi
Sadegh Azimzadeh Jamalkandi
Mohammad Reza Alivand
author_facet Raheleh Halabian
Valizadeh Arshad
Ali Ahmadi
Pardis Saeedi
Sadegh Azimzadeh Jamalkandi
Mohammad Reza Alivand
author_sort Raheleh Halabian
title Laboratory methods to decipher epigenetic signatures: a comparative review
title_short Laboratory methods to decipher epigenetic signatures: a comparative review
title_full Laboratory methods to decipher epigenetic signatures: a comparative review
title_fullStr Laboratory methods to decipher epigenetic signatures: a comparative review
title_full_unstemmed Laboratory methods to decipher epigenetic signatures: a comparative review
title_sort laboratory methods to decipher epigenetic signatures: a comparative review
publisher BMC
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/1b4cf8f29a574343ac6f6dd38dae2d49
work_keys_str_mv AT rahelehhalabian laboratorymethodstodecipherepigeneticsignaturesacomparativereview
AT valizadeharshad laboratorymethodstodecipherepigeneticsignaturesacomparativereview
AT aliahmadi laboratorymethodstodecipherepigeneticsignaturesacomparativereview
AT pardissaeedi laboratorymethodstodecipherepigeneticsignaturesacomparativereview
AT sadeghazimzadehjamalkandi laboratorymethodstodecipherepigeneticsignaturesacomparativereview
AT mohammadrezaalivand laboratorymethodstodecipherepigeneticsignaturesacomparativereview
_version_ 1718429392611311616