Statistical learning of target selection and distractor suppression shape attentional priority according to different timeframes

Abstract Recent findings suggest that attentional and oculomotor control is heavily affected by past experience, giving rise to selection and suppression history effects, so that target selection is facilitated if they appear at frequently attended locations, and distractor filtering is facilitated...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Valeria Di Caro, Chiara Della Libera
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/1b5dc24073684369a283ae51db22bad4
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:1b5dc24073684369a283ae51db22bad4
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:1b5dc24073684369a283ae51db22bad42021-12-02T14:34:03ZStatistical learning of target selection and distractor suppression shape attentional priority according to different timeframes10.1038/s41598-021-93335-02045-2322https://doaj.org/article/1b5dc24073684369a283ae51db22bad42021-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93335-0https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Recent findings suggest that attentional and oculomotor control is heavily affected by past experience, giving rise to selection and suppression history effects, so that target selection is facilitated if they appear at frequently attended locations, and distractor filtering is facilitated at frequently ignored locations. While selection history effects once instantiated seem to be long-lasting, whether suppression history is similarly durable is still debated. We assessed the permanence of these effects in a unique experimental setting investigating eye-movements, where the locations associated with statistical unbalances were exclusively linked with either target selection or distractor suppression. Experiment 1 and 2 explored the survival of suppression history in the long and in the short term, respectively, revealing that its lingering traces are relatively short lived. Experiment 3 showed that in the very same experimental context, selection history effects were long lasting. These results seem to suggest that different mechanisms support the learning-induced plasticity triggered by selection and suppression history. Specifically, while selection history may depend on lasting changes within stored representations of the visual space, suppression history effects hinge instead on a functional plasticity which is transient in nature, and involves spatial representations which are constantly updated and adaptively sustain ongoing oculomotor control.Valeria Di CaroChiara Della LiberaNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-14 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Valeria Di Caro
Chiara Della Libera
Statistical learning of target selection and distractor suppression shape attentional priority according to different timeframes
description Abstract Recent findings suggest that attentional and oculomotor control is heavily affected by past experience, giving rise to selection and suppression history effects, so that target selection is facilitated if they appear at frequently attended locations, and distractor filtering is facilitated at frequently ignored locations. While selection history effects once instantiated seem to be long-lasting, whether suppression history is similarly durable is still debated. We assessed the permanence of these effects in a unique experimental setting investigating eye-movements, where the locations associated with statistical unbalances were exclusively linked with either target selection or distractor suppression. Experiment 1 and 2 explored the survival of suppression history in the long and in the short term, respectively, revealing that its lingering traces are relatively short lived. Experiment 3 showed that in the very same experimental context, selection history effects were long lasting. These results seem to suggest that different mechanisms support the learning-induced plasticity triggered by selection and suppression history. Specifically, while selection history may depend on lasting changes within stored representations of the visual space, suppression history effects hinge instead on a functional plasticity which is transient in nature, and involves spatial representations which are constantly updated and adaptively sustain ongoing oculomotor control.
format article
author Valeria Di Caro
Chiara Della Libera
author_facet Valeria Di Caro
Chiara Della Libera
author_sort Valeria Di Caro
title Statistical learning of target selection and distractor suppression shape attentional priority according to different timeframes
title_short Statistical learning of target selection and distractor suppression shape attentional priority according to different timeframes
title_full Statistical learning of target selection and distractor suppression shape attentional priority according to different timeframes
title_fullStr Statistical learning of target selection and distractor suppression shape attentional priority according to different timeframes
title_full_unstemmed Statistical learning of target selection and distractor suppression shape attentional priority according to different timeframes
title_sort statistical learning of target selection and distractor suppression shape attentional priority according to different timeframes
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/1b5dc24073684369a283ae51db22bad4
work_keys_str_mv AT valeriadicaro statisticallearningoftargetselectionanddistractorsuppressionshapeattentionalpriorityaccordingtodifferenttimeframes
AT chiaradellalibera statisticallearningoftargetselectionanddistractorsuppressionshapeattentionalpriorityaccordingtodifferenttimeframes
_version_ 1718391116068290560