Aerobic exercise and aerobic fitness level do not modify motor learning

Abstract Motor learning may be enhanced when a single session of aerobic exercise is performed immediately before or after motor skill practice. Most research to date has focused on aerobically trained (AT) individuals, but it is unknown if aerobically untrained (AU) individuals would equally benefi...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Andrea Hung, Marc Roig, Jenna B. Gillen, Catherine M. Sabiston, Walter Swardfager, Joyce L. Chen
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:	Medicine R Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/1bb8e57d582c4e7aa07ee5c66ac9e787
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:1bb8e57d582c4e7aa07ee5c66ac9e787
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:1bb8e57d582c4e7aa07ee5c66ac9e7872021-12-02T15:53:00ZAerobic exercise and aerobic fitness level do not modify motor learning10.1038/s41598-021-84764-y2045-2322https://doaj.org/article/1bb8e57d582c4e7aa07ee5c66ac9e7872021-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84764-yhttps://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Motor learning may be enhanced when a single session of aerobic exercise is performed immediately before or after motor skill practice. Most research to date has focused on aerobically trained (AT) individuals, but it is unknown if aerobically untrained (AU) individuals would equally benefit. We aimed to: (a) replicate previous studies and determine the effect of rest (REST) versus exercise (EXE) on motor skill retention, and (b) explore the effect of aerobic fitness level (AU, AT), assessed by peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak), on motor skill retention after exercise. Forty-four participants (20–29 years) practiced a visuomotor tracking task (acquisition), immediately followed by 25-min of high-intensity cycling or rest. Twenty-four hours after acquisition, participants completed a motor skill retention test. REST and EXE groups significantly improved motor skill performance during acquisition [F(3.17, 133.22) = 269.13, P = 0.001], but had no group differences in motor skill retention across time. AU-exercise (VO2peak = 31.6 ± 4.2 ml kg−1 min−1) and AT-exercise (VO2peak = 51.5 ± 7.6 ml kg−1 min−1) groups significantly improved motor skill performance during acquisition [F(3.07, 61.44) = 155.95, P = 0.001], but had no group differences in motor skill retention across time. Therefore, exercise or aerobic fitness level did not modify motor skill retention.Andrea HungMarc RoigJenna B. GillenCatherine M. SabistonWalter SwardfagerJoyce L. ChenNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R Science Q
spellingShingle	Medicine R Science Q Andrea Hung Marc Roig Jenna B. Gillen Catherine M. Sabiston Walter Swardfager Joyce L. Chen Aerobic exercise and aerobic fitness level do not modify motor learning
description	Abstract Motor learning may be enhanced when a single session of aerobic exercise is performed immediately before or after motor skill practice. Most research to date has focused on aerobically trained (AT) individuals, but it is unknown if aerobically untrained (AU) individuals would equally benefit. We aimed to: (a) replicate previous studies and determine the effect of rest (REST) versus exercise (EXE) on motor skill retention, and (b) explore the effect of aerobic fitness level (AU, AT), assessed by peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak), on motor skill retention after exercise. Forty-four participants (20–29 years) practiced a visuomotor tracking task (acquisition), immediately followed by 25-min of high-intensity cycling or rest. Twenty-four hours after acquisition, participants completed a motor skill retention test. REST and EXE groups significantly improved motor skill performance during acquisition [F(3.17, 133.22) = 269.13, P = 0.001], but had no group differences in motor skill retention across time. AU-exercise (VO2peak = 31.6 ± 4.2 ml kg−1 min−1) and AT-exercise (VO2peak = 51.5 ± 7.6 ml kg−1 min−1) groups significantly improved motor skill performance during acquisition [F(3.07, 61.44) = 155.95, P = 0.001], but had no group differences in motor skill retention across time. Therefore, exercise or aerobic fitness level did not modify motor skill retention.
format	article
author	Andrea Hung Marc Roig Jenna B. Gillen Catherine M. Sabiston Walter Swardfager Joyce L. Chen
author_facet	Andrea Hung Marc Roig Jenna B. Gillen Catherine M. Sabiston Walter Swardfager Joyce L. Chen
author_sort	Andrea Hung
title	Aerobic exercise and aerobic fitness level do not modify motor learning
title_short	Aerobic exercise and aerobic fitness level do not modify motor learning
title_full	Aerobic exercise and aerobic fitness level do not modify motor learning
title_fullStr	Aerobic exercise and aerobic fitness level do not modify motor learning
title_full_unstemmed	Aerobic exercise and aerobic fitness level do not modify motor learning
title_sort	aerobic exercise and aerobic fitness level do not modify motor learning
publisher	Nature Portfolio
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/1bb8e57d582c4e7aa07ee5c66ac9e787
work_keys_str_mv	AT andreahung aerobicexerciseandaerobicfitnessleveldonotmodifymotorlearning AT marcroig aerobicexerciseandaerobicfitnessleveldonotmodifymotorlearning AT jennabgillen aerobicexerciseandaerobicfitnessleveldonotmodifymotorlearning AT catherinemsabiston aerobicexerciseandaerobicfitnessleveldonotmodifymotorlearning AT walterswardfager aerobicexerciseandaerobicfitnessleveldonotmodifymotorlearning AT joycelchen aerobicexerciseandaerobicfitnessleveldonotmodifymotorlearning
_version_	1718385497210880000

Aerobic exercise and aerobic fitness level do not modify motor learning

Ejemplares similares