Cost-effectiveness of Single vs Double Debridement and Implant Retention for Acute Periprosthetic Joint Infections in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Markov Model

Background: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a common cause of revision total knee surgery. Although debridement and implant retention (DAIR) has lower success rates in the chronic setting, it is an accepted treatment of acute PJI, whether postoperatively or with late hematogenous seeding. Th...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Joseph K. Antonios, MD, Kevin J. Bozic, MD, MBA, Henry D. Clarke, MD, Mark J. Spangehl, MD, Joshua S. Bingham, MD, Adam J. Schwartz, MD, MBA
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/1bc091f7a9464aa49b4eaeebc5888077
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:1bc091f7a9464aa49b4eaeebc5888077
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:1bc091f7a9464aa49b4eaeebc58880772021-11-14T04:34:00ZCost-effectiveness of Single vs Double Debridement and Implant Retention for Acute Periprosthetic Joint Infections in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Markov Model2352-344110.1016/j.artd.2021.08.009https://doaj.org/article/1bc091f7a9464aa49b4eaeebc58880772021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344121001503https://doaj.org/toc/2352-3441Background: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a common cause of revision total knee surgery. Although debridement and implant retention (DAIR) has lower success rates in the chronic setting, it is an accepted treatment of acute PJI, whether postoperatively or with late hematogenous seeding. There are two broad DAIR strategies: single debridement and planned double debridement. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of single vs double DAIR for acute PJI in total knee arthroplasty. Methods: A decision tree using single or double DAIR as the treatment strategy for acute PJI was constructed. Quality-adjusted life years and costs associated with the two treatment arms were calculated. Treatment success rates, failure rates, and mortality rates were derived from the literature. Medical costs were derived from both the literature and Medicare data. A cost-effectiveness plane was constructed from multiple Monte Carlo trials. A sensitivity analysis identified parameters most influencing the optimal strategy decision. Results: Double DAIR was the optimal treatment strategy both in terms of the health utility state (82% of trials) and medical cost (97% of trials). Strategy tables demonstrated that as long as the success rate of double debridement is 10% or greater than the success rate of a single debridement, the two-stage protocol is cost-effective. Conclusions: A double DAIR protocol is more cost-effective than single DAIR from a societal perspective.Joseph K. Antonios, MDKevin J. Bozic, MD, MBAHenry D. Clarke, MDMark J. Spangehl, MDJoshua S. Bingham, MDAdam J. Schwartz, MD, MBAElsevierarticleTotal knee arthroplastyAcute periprosthetic joint infectionDebridement and implant retentionFailed total knee arthroplastyOrthopedic surgeryRD701-811ENArthroplasty Today, Vol 11, Iss , Pp 187-195 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Total knee arthroplasty
Acute periprosthetic joint infection
Debridement and implant retention
Failed total knee arthroplasty
Orthopedic surgery
RD701-811
spellingShingle Total knee arthroplasty
Acute periprosthetic joint infection
Debridement and implant retention
Failed total knee arthroplasty
Orthopedic surgery
RD701-811
Joseph K. Antonios, MD
Kevin J. Bozic, MD, MBA
Henry D. Clarke, MD
Mark J. Spangehl, MD
Joshua S. Bingham, MD
Adam J. Schwartz, MD, MBA
Cost-effectiveness of Single vs Double Debridement and Implant Retention for Acute Periprosthetic Joint Infections in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Markov Model
description Background: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a common cause of revision total knee surgery. Although debridement and implant retention (DAIR) has lower success rates in the chronic setting, it is an accepted treatment of acute PJI, whether postoperatively or with late hematogenous seeding. There are two broad DAIR strategies: single debridement and planned double debridement. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of single vs double DAIR for acute PJI in total knee arthroplasty. Methods: A decision tree using single or double DAIR as the treatment strategy for acute PJI was constructed. Quality-adjusted life years and costs associated with the two treatment arms were calculated. Treatment success rates, failure rates, and mortality rates were derived from the literature. Medical costs were derived from both the literature and Medicare data. A cost-effectiveness plane was constructed from multiple Monte Carlo trials. A sensitivity analysis identified parameters most influencing the optimal strategy decision. Results: Double DAIR was the optimal treatment strategy both in terms of the health utility state (82% of trials) and medical cost (97% of trials). Strategy tables demonstrated that as long as the success rate of double debridement is 10% or greater than the success rate of a single debridement, the two-stage protocol is cost-effective. Conclusions: A double DAIR protocol is more cost-effective than single DAIR from a societal perspective.
format article
author Joseph K. Antonios, MD
Kevin J. Bozic, MD, MBA
Henry D. Clarke, MD
Mark J. Spangehl, MD
Joshua S. Bingham, MD
Adam J. Schwartz, MD, MBA
author_facet Joseph K. Antonios, MD
Kevin J. Bozic, MD, MBA
Henry D. Clarke, MD
Mark J. Spangehl, MD
Joshua S. Bingham, MD
Adam J. Schwartz, MD, MBA
author_sort Joseph K. Antonios, MD
title Cost-effectiveness of Single vs Double Debridement and Implant Retention for Acute Periprosthetic Joint Infections in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Markov Model
title_short Cost-effectiveness of Single vs Double Debridement and Implant Retention for Acute Periprosthetic Joint Infections in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Markov Model
title_full Cost-effectiveness of Single vs Double Debridement and Implant Retention for Acute Periprosthetic Joint Infections in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Markov Model
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of Single vs Double Debridement and Implant Retention for Acute Periprosthetic Joint Infections in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Markov Model
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of Single vs Double Debridement and Implant Retention for Acute Periprosthetic Joint Infections in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Markov Model
title_sort cost-effectiveness of single vs double debridement and implant retention for acute periprosthetic joint infections in total knee arthroplasty: a markov model
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/1bc091f7a9464aa49b4eaeebc5888077
work_keys_str_mv AT josephkantoniosmd costeffectivenessofsinglevsdoubledebridementandimplantretentionforacuteperiprostheticjointinfectionsintotalkneearthroplastyamarkovmodel
AT kevinjbozicmdmba costeffectivenessofsinglevsdoubledebridementandimplantretentionforacuteperiprostheticjointinfectionsintotalkneearthroplastyamarkovmodel
AT henrydclarkemd costeffectivenessofsinglevsdoubledebridementandimplantretentionforacuteperiprostheticjointinfectionsintotalkneearthroplastyamarkovmodel
AT markjspangehlmd costeffectivenessofsinglevsdoubledebridementandimplantretentionforacuteperiprostheticjointinfectionsintotalkneearthroplastyamarkovmodel
AT joshuasbinghammd costeffectivenessofsinglevsdoubledebridementandimplantretentionforacuteperiprostheticjointinfectionsintotalkneearthroplastyamarkovmodel
AT adamjschwartzmdmba costeffectivenessofsinglevsdoubledebridementandimplantretentionforacuteperiprostheticjointinfectionsintotalkneearthroplastyamarkovmodel
_version_ 1718429942778167296