Comparative study of straight vs angled incision in 27-gauge vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane

Ryo Yomoda, Hiroki Sasaki, Jiro Kogo, Akira Shiono, Tatsuya Jujo, Reio Sekine, Naoto Tokuda, Yasushi Kitaoka, Hitoshi Takagi Department of Ophthalmology, St Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare straight and angled incis...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Yomoda R, Sasaki H, Kogo J, Shiono A, Jujo T, Sekine R, Tokuda N, Kitaoka Y, Takagi H
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:	27-gauge vitrectomy MIVS epiretinal membrane straight incision angled incision anterior segment OCT Ophthalmology RE1-994
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/1bc364ecd2034039b1f299d8f7687f1d
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:1bc364ecd2034039b1f299d8f7687f1d
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:1bc364ecd2034039b1f299d8f7687f1d2021-12-02T07:08:56ZComparative study of straight vs angled incision in 27-gauge vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane1177-5483https://doaj.org/article/1bc364ecd2034039b1f299d8f7687f1d2018-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/comparative-study-of-straight-vs-angled-incision-in-27-gauge-vitrectom-peer-reviewed-article-OPTHhttps://doaj.org/toc/1177-5483Ryo Yomoda, Hiroki Sasaki, Jiro Kogo, Akira Shiono, Tatsuya Jujo, Reio Sekine, Naoto Tokuda, Yasushi Kitaoka, Hitoshi Takagi Department of Ophthalmology, St Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare straight and angled incisions in 27-gauge microincision vitrectomy in patients with epiretinal membrane (ERM).Methods: Seventy-three eyes of 68 patients with ERM who underwent straight (35 eyes) or angled incision (38 eyes) for 27-gauge microincision vitrectomy were retrospectively evaluated.Results: No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in postoperative logarithm of minimal angle of resolution best-corrected visual acuity. The intraocular pressure and rate of hypotony 1 day postoperatively did not differ between the straight- and angled-incision groups (intraocular pressure: 11.5 vs 13.4 mmHg, respectively; rate of hypotony: 20% vs 8%, respectively). Surgical wound closing occurred by postoperative day 10 in both groups.Conclusion: A straight incision is as safe and useful in ERM vitrectomy as an angled one. Keywords: 27-gauge vitrectomy, MIVS, epiretinal membrane, straight incision, angled incision, anterior segment OCT Yomoda RSasaki HKogo JShiono AJujo TSekine RTokuda NKitaoka YTakagi HDove Medical Pressarticle27-gauge vitrectomyMIVSepiretinal membranestraight incisionangled incisionanterior segment OCTOphthalmologyRE1-994ENClinical Ophthalmology, Vol Volume 12, Pp 2409-2414 (2018)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	27-gauge vitrectomy MIVS epiretinal membrane straight incision angled incision anterior segment OCT Ophthalmology RE1-994
spellingShingle	27-gauge vitrectomy MIVS epiretinal membrane straight incision angled incision anterior segment OCT Ophthalmology RE1-994 Yomoda R Sasaki H Kogo J Shiono A Jujo T Sekine R Tokuda N Kitaoka Y Takagi H Comparative study of straight vs angled incision in 27-gauge vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane
description	Ryo Yomoda, Hiroki Sasaki, Jiro Kogo, Akira Shiono, Tatsuya Jujo, Reio Sekine, Naoto Tokuda, Yasushi Kitaoka, Hitoshi Takagi Department of Ophthalmology, St Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare straight and angled incisions in 27-gauge microincision vitrectomy in patients with epiretinal membrane (ERM).Methods: Seventy-three eyes of 68 patients with ERM who underwent straight (35 eyes) or angled incision (38 eyes) for 27-gauge microincision vitrectomy were retrospectively evaluated.Results: No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in postoperative logarithm of minimal angle of resolution best-corrected visual acuity. The intraocular pressure and rate of hypotony 1 day postoperatively did not differ between the straight- and angled-incision groups (intraocular pressure: 11.5 vs 13.4 mmHg, respectively; rate of hypotony: 20% vs 8%, respectively). Surgical wound closing occurred by postoperative day 10 in both groups.Conclusion: A straight incision is as safe and useful in ERM vitrectomy as an angled one. Keywords: 27-gauge vitrectomy, MIVS, epiretinal membrane, straight incision, angled incision, anterior segment OCT
format	article
author	Yomoda R Sasaki H Kogo J Shiono A Jujo T Sekine R Tokuda N Kitaoka Y Takagi H
author_facet	Yomoda R Sasaki H Kogo J Shiono A Jujo T Sekine R Tokuda N Kitaoka Y Takagi H
author_sort	Yomoda R
title	Comparative study of straight vs angled incision in 27-gauge vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane
title_short	Comparative study of straight vs angled incision in 27-gauge vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane
title_full	Comparative study of straight vs angled incision in 27-gauge vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane
title_fullStr	Comparative study of straight vs angled incision in 27-gauge vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane
title_full_unstemmed	Comparative study of straight vs angled incision in 27-gauge vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane
title_sort	comparative study of straight vs angled incision in 27-gauge vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane
publisher	Dove Medical Press
publishDate	2018
url	https://doaj.org/article/1bc364ecd2034039b1f299d8f7687f1d
work_keys_str_mv	AT yomodar comparativestudyofstraightvsangledincisionin27gaugevitrectomyforepiretinalmembrane AT sasakih comparativestudyofstraightvsangledincisionin27gaugevitrectomyforepiretinalmembrane AT kogoj comparativestudyofstraightvsangledincisionin27gaugevitrectomyforepiretinalmembrane AT shionoa comparativestudyofstraightvsangledincisionin27gaugevitrectomyforepiretinalmembrane AT jujot comparativestudyofstraightvsangledincisionin27gaugevitrectomyforepiretinalmembrane AT sekiner comparativestudyofstraightvsangledincisionin27gaugevitrectomyforepiretinalmembrane AT tokudan comparativestudyofstraightvsangledincisionin27gaugevitrectomyforepiretinalmembrane AT kitaokay comparativestudyofstraightvsangledincisionin27gaugevitrectomyforepiretinalmembrane AT takagih comparativestudyofstraightvsangledincisionin27gaugevitrectomyforepiretinalmembrane
_version_	1718399558429442048

Comparative study of straight vs angled incision in 27-gauge vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane

Ejemplares similares