Patient-Reported Questionnaires to Identify Adverse Drug Reactions: A Systematic Review

Background: This systematic review aims to summarise available patient-reported questionnaires to detect adverse drug reactions (ADRs) that can be utilised by healthcare professionals in clinical practice and to summarise the psychometric properties (validity, reliability, and responsiveness) of the...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Renly Lim, Lisa Kalisch Ellett, Elizabeth E. Roughead, Phaik Yeong Cheah, Nashwa Masnoon
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	MDPI AG 2021
Materias:	adverse drug reactions adverse events medication safety patient safety questionnaire side-effects Medicine R
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/1bcf54d292cc43e49457d70d2ebd0ccc
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:1bcf54d292cc43e49457d70d2ebd0ccc
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:1bcf54d292cc43e49457d70d2ebd0ccc2021-11-25T17:49:09ZPatient-Reported Questionnaires to Identify Adverse Drug Reactions: A Systematic Review10.3390/ijerph1822118771660-46011661-7827https://doaj.org/article/1bcf54d292cc43e49457d70d2ebd0ccc2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/22/11877https://doaj.org/toc/1661-7827https://doaj.org/toc/1660-4601Background: This systematic review aims to summarise available patient-reported questionnaires to detect adverse drug reactions (ADRs) that can be utilised by healthcare professionals in clinical practice and to summarise the psychometric properties (validity, reliability, and responsiveness) of the questionnaires. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted using Medline, Pubmed, Embase, and Emcare databases to screen for articles published between January 2000 and July 2020. Data items regarding validity, reliability, and responsiveness were extracted independently by two authors. The methodological quality was assessed using the COSMIN (Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments) checklist. Results: A total of 1563 unique article titles were identified after removing duplicates. Following shortlisting of relevant articles, 19 patient-reported ADR questionnaires were identified. Questionnaires most commonly focused on mental health medications (42.1%, <i>n</i> = 8), followed by general questionnaires applicable to any medication (21.1%, <i>n</i> = 4). Many questionnaires did not report assessing the validity and reliability of the measurement tool. For example, only 11 questionnaires (58%) mentioned assessing content validity, in addition to criterion or construct testing. Conclusion: This systematic review summarised the available patient-reported questionnaires that can be used in research and clinical practice to identify ADRs. Results of this systematic review highlight the need for more robust validity and reliability testing when developing patient-reported ADR questionnaires.Renly LimLisa Kalisch EllettElizabeth E. RougheadPhaik Yeong CheahNashwa MasnoonMDPI AGarticleadverse drug reactionsadverse eventsmedication safetypatient safetyquestionnaireside-effectsMedicineRENInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol 18, Iss 11877, p 11877 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	adverse drug reactions adverse events medication safety patient safety questionnaire side-effects Medicine R
spellingShingle	adverse drug reactions adverse events medication safety patient safety questionnaire side-effects Medicine R Renly Lim Lisa Kalisch Ellett Elizabeth E. Roughead Phaik Yeong Cheah Nashwa Masnoon Patient-Reported Questionnaires to Identify Adverse Drug Reactions: A Systematic Review
description	Background: This systematic review aims to summarise available patient-reported questionnaires to detect adverse drug reactions (ADRs) that can be utilised by healthcare professionals in clinical practice and to summarise the psychometric properties (validity, reliability, and responsiveness) of the questionnaires. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted using Medline, Pubmed, Embase, and Emcare databases to screen for articles published between January 2000 and July 2020. Data items regarding validity, reliability, and responsiveness were extracted independently by two authors. The methodological quality was assessed using the COSMIN (Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments) checklist. Results: A total of 1563 unique article titles were identified after removing duplicates. Following shortlisting of relevant articles, 19 patient-reported ADR questionnaires were identified. Questionnaires most commonly focused on mental health medications (42.1%, <i>n</i> = 8), followed by general questionnaires applicable to any medication (21.1%, <i>n</i> = 4). Many questionnaires did not report assessing the validity and reliability of the measurement tool. For example, only 11 questionnaires (58%) mentioned assessing content validity, in addition to criterion or construct testing. Conclusion: This systematic review summarised the available patient-reported questionnaires that can be used in research and clinical practice to identify ADRs. Results of this systematic review highlight the need for more robust validity and reliability testing when developing patient-reported ADR questionnaires.
format	article
author	Renly Lim Lisa Kalisch Ellett Elizabeth E. Roughead Phaik Yeong Cheah Nashwa Masnoon
author_facet	Renly Lim Lisa Kalisch Ellett Elizabeth E. Roughead Phaik Yeong Cheah Nashwa Masnoon
author_sort	Renly Lim
title	Patient-Reported Questionnaires to Identify Adverse Drug Reactions: A Systematic Review
title_short	Patient-Reported Questionnaires to Identify Adverse Drug Reactions: A Systematic Review
title_full	Patient-Reported Questionnaires to Identify Adverse Drug Reactions: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr	Patient-Reported Questionnaires to Identify Adverse Drug Reactions: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed	Patient-Reported Questionnaires to Identify Adverse Drug Reactions: A Systematic Review
title_sort	patient-reported questionnaires to identify adverse drug reactions: a systematic review
publisher	MDPI AG
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/1bcf54d292cc43e49457d70d2ebd0ccc
work_keys_str_mv	AT renlylim patientreportedquestionnairestoidentifyadversedrugreactionsasystematicreview AT lisakalischellett patientreportedquestionnairestoidentifyadversedrugreactionsasystematicreview AT elizabetheroughead patientreportedquestionnairestoidentifyadversedrugreactionsasystematicreview AT phaikyeongcheah patientreportedquestionnairestoidentifyadversedrugreactionsasystematicreview AT nashwamasnoon patientreportedquestionnairestoidentifyadversedrugreactionsasystematicreview
_version_	1718411970799992832

Patient-Reported Questionnaires to Identify Adverse Drug Reactions: A Systematic Review

Ejemplares similares