Self-Reported Social Media Use among Ophthalmology Residents

Objective To assess ophthalmology trainees' self-reported use of and attitudes toward social media. Methods An online survey was distributed by email to ophthalmology residency applicants of the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute between September 2016 and January 2020. Results O...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arjun Watane, Hasenin Al-khersan, Meghana Kalavar, Bilal Ahmed, Michael Venincasa, Jayanth Sridhar
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/1bf0c3d897d84c9f89a7f55a9c447a32
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:1bf0c3d897d84c9f89a7f55a9c447a32
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:1bf0c3d897d84c9f89a7f55a9c447a322021-12-02T00:16:55ZSelf-Reported Social Media Use among Ophthalmology Residents2475-475710.1055/s-0041-1736661https://doaj.org/article/1bf0c3d897d84c9f89a7f55a9c447a322021-07-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0041-1736661https://doaj.org/toc/2475-4757Objective To assess ophthalmology trainees' self-reported use of and attitudes toward social media. Methods An online survey was distributed by email to ophthalmology residency applicants of the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute between September 2016 and January 2020. Results Of the 1,688 email recipients, the survey was filled by 208 ophthalmology trainees (12.3%). Nearly all trainees reported using social media for personal purposes (92.3%), while less than half used social media for professional purposes (43.4%). There were mixed sentiments regarding the impact of social media on the patient–physician relationship, with the majority feeling that it challenges a physician's authority (55.2%) but also empowers the patient (57.5%) and encourages shared care (92.8%). Twenty-five percent of trainees had reviewed professional social media guidelines, and most rated the quality of medical information on social media as “poor” (60.9%). There were low rates of trainees looking up patients (13.8%), providing their account information to patients (1.5%), responding to patients' messages (2.6%), following patients' accounts (2.6%), and being followed by patients (2.6%). Conclusion The majority of ophthalmology trainees are active on social media. As these trainees enter practice, ophthalmology will likely see a rise in social media use. Training programs should consider a formal social media policy that is shared with all trainees as part of their education.Arjun WataneHasenin Al-khersanMeghana KalavarBilal AhmedMichael VenincasaJayanth SridharThieme Medical Publishers, Inc.articlesocial mediaophthalmologyresidencyOphthalmologyRE1-994ENJournal of Academic Ophthalmology, Vol 13, Iss 02, Pp e195-e199 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic social media
ophthalmology
residency
Ophthalmology
RE1-994
spellingShingle social media
ophthalmology
residency
Ophthalmology
RE1-994
Arjun Watane
Hasenin Al-khersan
Meghana Kalavar
Bilal Ahmed
Michael Venincasa
Jayanth Sridhar
Self-Reported Social Media Use among Ophthalmology Residents
description Objective To assess ophthalmology trainees' self-reported use of and attitudes toward social media. Methods An online survey was distributed by email to ophthalmology residency applicants of the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute between September 2016 and January 2020. Results Of the 1,688 email recipients, the survey was filled by 208 ophthalmology trainees (12.3%). Nearly all trainees reported using social media for personal purposes (92.3%), while less than half used social media for professional purposes (43.4%). There were mixed sentiments regarding the impact of social media on the patient–physician relationship, with the majority feeling that it challenges a physician's authority (55.2%) but also empowers the patient (57.5%) and encourages shared care (92.8%). Twenty-five percent of trainees had reviewed professional social media guidelines, and most rated the quality of medical information on social media as “poor” (60.9%). There were low rates of trainees looking up patients (13.8%), providing their account information to patients (1.5%), responding to patients' messages (2.6%), following patients' accounts (2.6%), and being followed by patients (2.6%). Conclusion The majority of ophthalmology trainees are active on social media. As these trainees enter practice, ophthalmology will likely see a rise in social media use. Training programs should consider a formal social media policy that is shared with all trainees as part of their education.
format article
author Arjun Watane
Hasenin Al-khersan
Meghana Kalavar
Bilal Ahmed
Michael Venincasa
Jayanth Sridhar
author_facet Arjun Watane
Hasenin Al-khersan
Meghana Kalavar
Bilal Ahmed
Michael Venincasa
Jayanth Sridhar
author_sort Arjun Watane
title Self-Reported Social Media Use among Ophthalmology Residents
title_short Self-Reported Social Media Use among Ophthalmology Residents
title_full Self-Reported Social Media Use among Ophthalmology Residents
title_fullStr Self-Reported Social Media Use among Ophthalmology Residents
title_full_unstemmed Self-Reported Social Media Use among Ophthalmology Residents
title_sort self-reported social media use among ophthalmology residents
publisher Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/1bf0c3d897d84c9f89a7f55a9c447a32
work_keys_str_mv AT arjunwatane selfreportedsocialmediauseamongophthalmologyresidents
AT haseninalkhersan selfreportedsocialmediauseamongophthalmologyresidents
AT meghanakalavar selfreportedsocialmediauseamongophthalmologyresidents
AT bilalahmed selfreportedsocialmediauseamongophthalmologyresidents
AT michaelvenincasa selfreportedsocialmediauseamongophthalmologyresidents
AT jayanthsridhar selfreportedsocialmediauseamongophthalmologyresidents
_version_ 1718403786828939264